I’ve watched it, and I have enough background in IT to understand the packet captures and the argument being made. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the work that was done to analyze and verify the contents and that the representation shown is true and correct. In other words, I’ll stipulate that everything presented is 100% accurate.
Here’s the problem: What is the legal mechanism by which this is going to have any effect? The constitution defines the powers of the Supreme Court just as it delegates the running of elections to the States. Under what constitutional basis would the Supreme Court ever agree to hear whatever Mike Lindell wants them to hear? There is a process by which SCOTUS decides which cases it will hear and they reject certori all the time.
While the case that China was behind the cyber crimes that changed the election (God knows they had plenty of motivation, Trump was crushing them) - the case may be compelling as hell but there is no way that I can see that SCOTUS would ever hear it, and there is no constitutional mechanism to do anything about it even if it was “9-0”.
Quo Warranto
I am no lawyer, however I have a question.
Suppose the Supreme Court ruled that there really was no election due to its total corruption and illegality.
Would that mean Trump is still president?
The Constitution does not outline what to do in a case like this because for some reason they never envisioned it. The Constitution outlined the ordinary; death, assassination, etc.
In my opinion, since they did not consider outright fraud and corruption, neither did they rule on what to do.
In other words, make it up as you go and the hell with the hindmost.
My own thoughts are that the founding fathers never considered that we would be so spineless as to tolerate what is happening today. Tar and feathers and a ride on the rail out of town would have been expected, enforced with a large collection of our 2nd amendment equipment.
“There is no constitutional mechanism to do anything about it even if it was “9-0”.”
Good points. Thank you. Yes, the Supreme Court has the power to looks at the facts from the 2020 Election. However, there is a power superior to the Supreme Court which is a mixture of solidarity (suffering people) and the Lord (Who hears their cries.)
There is a constitutional remedy to any and every tyrannical assault on our country. The only question is whether American citizens have to find themselves in gulags before they realize they should have exercised that option.
I can't tell if Mike Lindell is a fraud, or just a nice guy being duped by people taking advantage of him and feeding him nonsense he doesn't understand.
OK, you say you have an IT background, how do you think they were able to capture packets on election night in multiple states, with thousands of voting locations? Unless the guy is an NSA defector, it didn't happen. It's probably some smart hacker, with a bunch of fake data, selling Mike what he wants to hear.
UNFORTUNATELY YOUR ANALYSIS IS DEAD ON. THERE IS NO WAY TO COMPEL SCOTUS TO HEAR THE CASE, AND EVEN IF THEY DO RULE 9-O THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONALLY PRESCRIBED METHOD FOR REMEDY.
HOWEVER, WHERE THERE IS A WILL THERE IS A WAY.
OUR ENTIRE MILITARY HAS TAKEN AN OATH TO PROTECT AND DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION FROM ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, AND IF THESE ATTACKS AGAINST THE VERY FABRIC OF OUR NATION DOESN’T QUALIFY AS ENEMY ATTACKS, NOTHING EVER HAS, OR WILL EVER. PEARL HARBOR, AND 9/11 ARE NOTHING AS COMPARED TO THIS ATTACK.
AND, MAY G-D FORBID, THE SECOND AMENDMENT, YET PROVIDES A WAY, HORRIBLE AS IT MAY BE, IF WE THE PEOPLE, REFUSE TO BE ENSLAVED, AND HAVE OUR COUNTRY LITERALLY STOLEN FROM US BY A COORDINATED ATTACK BY ENEMIES BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
WE THE PEOPLE, UNDER G-D, ARE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
WE ARE THE RIGHT, WE ARE THE TRUTH, WE ARE THE FINAL AUTHORITY, AND WE WILL PREVAIL, SO HELP US, G-D.
HAVE NO DOUBT OF THAT.
NONE.
“...the case may be compelling as hell but there is no way that I can see that SCOTUS would ever hear it, and there is no constitutional mechanism to do anything about it even if it was “9-0”.”
None of our institutions can ignore public opinion.
We like to think our justice system is blind, but it is not. It heeds public opinion. Even the press will buckle under if there is enough public pressure.
Believe me, if a solid majority of people are convinced there was election fraud, and are sufficiently outraged by it - anything can happen.
If public opinion turns our way, the Democrats would be hung out to dry - by the SC, by the FBI - by the deep state - even the fake news will want to be on the side of public opinion.
ALL we need is public opinion squarely on our side and the rest of the dominos will fall.
They won't even look at the evidence. They'll just say, "this case is moot", and dismiss it.
Legal mechanisms?
Yours is an excellent point, but I think I understand that most people do not seriously expect some Trump installation to happen. This evidence however is crucial to the reform efforts, whatever needs done to prevent this from ever happening again! Let’s please not discourage anything however there is little harm in people’s dreaming and we might just make something unexpected happen.
Confident and prayerful, God grant the right.
Freegards bigbob!
Legal mechanisms?
Yours is an excellent point, but I think I understand that most people do not seriously expect some Trump installation to happen. This evidence however is crucial to the reform efforts, whatever needs done to prevent this from ever happening again! Let’s please not discourage anything however there is little harm in people’s dreaming and we might just make something unexpected happen.
Confident and prayerful, God grant the right.
Freegards bigbob!