Mike Lindell Presents: Absolutely 9-0

FrankSpeech.com ^ | 03 June, 2021 | Mike Lindell

[Robert DeLong]

Looks like the case may be able to be made. They have the pcaps (packet captures) of the election in real time.

It's like having a video of a bank robbery.

[Robert DeLong]

Agreed

[bagster]

Accepting the premise, that Trump had it all on election day, how do you reconcile the ineffective methods in overturning the fake election results in a timely manner?

This is the easiest way to answer. I'm going from this:

Nov 12, 2020 10:20:17 PM EST

(third to last post by you know who)

Shall we play a game?
[N]othing [C]an [S]top [W]hat [I]s [C]oming NCSWIC
https://www.cisa.gov/safecom/NCSWIC
Who stepped down today [forced]?
https://www.cisa.gov/bryan-s-ware
More coming?
Why is this relevant?
How do you 'show' the public the truth?
How do you 'safeguard' US elections post-POTUS?
How do you 'remove' foreign interference and corruption and install US-owned voter ID law(s) and other safeguards?
It had to be this way.
Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light.

____________________________

There is no possible way that Trump and team weren't completely ready for the election fraud. After all, word around the campfire is that 'patriots' interfered with satellites to disrupt the theft in 2016.

(click the links)

Of course they viewed and captured all the necessary data that travelled over the internet and/or satellites back and forth from Italy, Germany, and likely other parts unknown.

When Trump slyly says, 'We caught them' he ain't whistlin' Dixie.

How do you take the necessary action when State Legislators, Congress, and the court system fail to do their duty?

First, you show the people the consequences. Then, as that certain someone also said; Then you lay out the incontrovertible evidence.

The military is the only way. And the people must support that.

So, you probly think that's all a bunch of tin hat hogwash. Most people do. But are you personally fired up enough to support the military enforcing the Constitution? I am. What some see as an impossibility I see as likely.

And does Trump seem like he knows something we don't?

I think he does.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

Oh, p.s.

Trump could have accomplished this better when he had power and effectively called in the R senators and Pence to show them the goods.

70% or more of Republican Senators (and House) are derps and never supported Trump to begin with. They wanted him gone. He turned over too many apple carts. Pence was in on the scam, he's a derp. So that was never an option.

The end.

[BDParrish]

Legal mechanisms?
Yours is an excellent point, but I think I understand that most people do not seriously expect some Trump installation to happen. This evidence however is crucial to the reform efforts, whatever needs done to prevent this from ever happening again! Let’s please not discourage anything however there is little harm in people’s dreaming and we might just make something unexpected happen.

Confident and prayerful, God grant the right.
Freegards bigbob!

[BDParrish]

Legal mechanisms?
Yours is an excellent point, but I think I understand that most people do not seriously expect some Trump installation to happen. This evidence however is crucial to the reform efforts, whatever needs done to prevent this from ever happening again! Let’s please not discourage anything however there is little harm in people’s dreaming and we might just make something unexpected happen.

Confident and prayerful, God grant the right.
Freegards bigbob!

[bagster]

Well thank you bagster! I take it you also are getting tired of the fake conservatives pissing all over FR threads?

I was tired of it four years ago.

Eeyore Shleprock know-it-alls irritate me.

[bagster]

Essentially “we have our ‘top’ people working on this” sort of ‘schtick. Lindell believes the data helps lead to a 9-0 slam dunk in SCOTUS... but the public does not merit seeing the data to test his claims... because they... just can’t.

Stop crying, shill, just cause you're not 'in the loop'.

Yet.

[bagster]

Unfortunately he’s still running the con. Just like you.

You can thank us later. In the meantime, pipe down.

Patriots are working.

[katykelly]

Bfl

[Lurker]

“You can thank us later.”

We’ve already thanked you for the advice to:

Trust Sessions
Trust Barr
Trust Durham

So we are all out of thanks. Until we see some results, anyway.

Which, given your track record, will be precisely never.

Now go help your mom with dinner.

L

[bagster]

Now go help your mom with dinner.

Can't.

Me and YOUR mom are stepping out tonight.

[Lurker]

Figured you for a necrophiliac right from the start.

(Big word. Go look it up.)

L

[bagster]

(Big word. Go look it up.)

I'm too stupit. I'll just ask your mom over dinner and drinks.

[Lurker]

“I’m too stupit.”

Nice of you to come out and say it.

So where’s that Durham Report your Lead Con Artist was coming out months ago?

L

[Dr. Franklin]

. SCOTUS refused to act when confronted with violations of the Constitution through usurping the powers of the state legislature. What makes you think they will act now?

I hope that the court makes a distinction between a political decision to certify an imperfect election, and a judicial determination that fraud and foreign interference changed the election result. Again, Giuliani and company limited their claims to not certifying an election not conducted according to statute. The issue this time will be fraud. Hopefully, that makes the difference.

[Dr. Franklin]

Good grief.

He's your dog, Charlie Brown!

[MayflowerMadam]

I have to admit that I never followed anything “Q”, so can’t relate.

[bagster]

So where’s that Durham Report your Lead Con Artist was coming out months ago?

What am I, Durham?

You ask the dumbest questions. Were you raised by wolves?

[bagster]

p.s.

“I’m too stupit.”

Nice of you to come out and say it.

Q predicted that would be your comeback.

We have your playbook.

[bagster]

I have to admit that I never followed anything “Q”, so can’t relate.

It was more of a rhetorical question to make a point.

: )

[Lurker]

“Q predicted that would be your comeback.”

Prove it, loser.

L