Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's 'artificial sun' nuclear fusion reactor sets a new world record after running at 216MILLION°F for 100 seconds - as the nation inches closer to its goal of 'limitless clean power'
The Daily Mail uK ^ | 03 Jun 2021 | Sam Tonkin

Posted on 06/03/2021 12:20:13 AM PDT by blueplum

China's nuclear fusion reactor set new world record by running at 216million°F It also achieved a peak temperature more than ten times hotter than the sun Scientists hope the 'artificial sun' will unlock a powerful green energy source Next aim to run at a consistent temperature for a week rather than 100 seconds

...The machine, China's largest and most advanced nuclear fusion experimental research device, uses a powerful magnetic field to fuse hot plasma.

It is designed to replicate the nuclear fusion process that occurs naturally in the sun and stars to provide almost infinite clean energy....

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: artificialsun; china; nuclear; tech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
what could possibly go wrong?
1 posted on 06/03/2021 12:20:13 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueplum

They should try cold fusion instead! much easier!


2 posted on 06/03/2021 12:24:35 AM PDT by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
1. I assume this was doin in a vacuum so the question is how do you extract the energy?

2. How large was this reaction? Usually in this type of experiments we are talking very small amounts, nanograms or less.

3 posted on 06/03/2021 12:26:58 AM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Riefenstahl and Goebbels would be proud of news like this.

CC


4 posted on 06/03/2021 12:27:04 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

216 million degrees? F or C?

Either way, not nearly as hot as Melania Trump.


5 posted on 06/03/2021 12:28:09 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

News from the most trustworthy government in the history of the world! China is going to save us all! Hail our slave masters in China! /s


6 posted on 06/03/2021 12:29:24 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

And Sleepy 46 stops the drilling.


7 posted on 06/03/2021 12:31:07 AM PDT by Veggie Todd (Religion. It's like a History class. Without the facts. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
So they are saying a nuclear fission reactor will resolve the search for 'limitless clean power'? Not solar or wind? Fancy that.
8 posted on 06/03/2021 12:32:46 AM PDT by Robwin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
It also needs a certain density before you can break even . They might get it to work but practical power from fusion seems to be one of those things that is perpetually always 20 years away.

At least Gravity waves have finally been detected. It used to have the same reputation.

9 posted on 06/03/2021 12:39:28 AM PDT by Nateman (If the Left Is not screaming , you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

From the folks who brought you Covid.


10 posted on 06/03/2021 12:42:08 AM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL
1. I assume this was doin in a vacuum so the question is how do you extract the energy? 2. How large was this reaction? Usually in this type of experiments we are talking very small amounts, nanograms or less.

The fusion took place in a near vacuum. But to a physicist, vacuums are relative. To a physicist, it isn't important whether the fusion took place at 1 Pascal, or 1 micro-Pascal. To a physicist, it isn't important whether it would - in practical terms - be easy or difficult to actually harvest that energy. He is elated that he succeeded in attaining controlled fusion. That is all that matters to him.

Yes, I suppose that only nanograms of matter were actually fused - though that would still yield / release a considerable amount of energy (which might even - if practically harvestable - be approx. equal to the amount needed to run the set-up, meaning that it would then be self-sustaining).

Regards,

11 posted on 06/03/2021 12:44:03 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robwin
So they are saying a nuclear fission reactor will resolve the search for 'limitless clean power'? Not solar or wind? Fancy that.

The article is about fusion, not fission.

Fusion, like what powers the Sun.

Regards,

12 posted on 06/03/2021 12:45:54 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

That’s almost as hot as Algore said the earth is.


13 posted on 06/03/2021 12:49:59 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Caveat Emperor: Comitii asinorum atque rhinocerorum delendi sunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Oh great, the world’s worst environmental polluter fooling around with technology that creates solar heat on the earth. What could possibly go wrong?


14 posted on 06/03/2021 12:52:16 AM PDT by Peter ODonnell (Pray for health, economic recovery, and justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Maybe they’ll screw up fry themselves.
100%


15 posted on 06/03/2021 1:08:08 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Yes, but can it be used to illuminate a lightbulb? How about 2 lightbulbs?


16 posted on 06/03/2021 1:08:26 AM PDT by jroehl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robwin

Fusion (hydrogen to helium) not fusion (splitting thorium, uranium, or plutonium).


17 posted on 06/03/2021 1:14:40 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
From the article:

Taylor Wilson found widespread fame when he built his own nuclear reactor aged 14 in 2008.

The machine was capable of smashing atoms in a plasma core at over 500 million degrees Fahrenheit—40 times hotter than the core of the sun—in his parents' garage..

and:

Before the successes of these geniuses was David Hahn, known as the 'Radioactive Boy Scout’.

He built a nuclear reactor in his potting shed and shut down a neighbourhood of 40,000 in 1996..

18 posted on 06/03/2021 1:19:11 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Let’s see if they get massive solar flares like the Nic Cage flick “Knowing.”


19 posted on 06/03/2021 2:24:47 AM PDT by Browns Ultra Fan (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Good one. Don’t forget Fauci.


20 posted on 06/03/2021 2:25:42 AM PDT by Browns Ultra Fan (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson