Skip to comments.
Scientist find a loophole in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
Live Science ^
| 05/15/2021
| Ben Turner
Posted on 05/16/2021 9:35:06 AM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
1
posted on
05/16/2021 9:35:06 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
05/16/2021 9:35:38 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
How can they be certain about this?
3
posted on
05/16/2021 9:38:19 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
To: BenLurkin
Is there really ANY there there anywhere?
4
posted on
05/16/2021 9:41:16 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(.)
To: BenLurkin
So, they’re banging on drums for science.
Ask Professor Buddy Rich for his thoughts.
5
posted on
05/16/2021 9:41:27 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
To: BenLurkin
The scientists in the first experiment... placed tiny drums, each around 10 micrometers long, on a crystal chip, before supercooling them to near absolute zero. Quantum bongos.
6
posted on
05/16/2021 9:41:36 AM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
To: Flick Lives
The Quantum Bongos.
Great name for an amusement park band.
7
posted on
05/16/2021 9:44:19 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
This is actually pretty neat. We’re stepping closer to a sort of Star Trek “subspace communication”; instantaneous communication between two locations no matter how far apart.
8
posted on
05/16/2021 9:44:26 AM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
To: BenLurkin
This doesn’t invalidate Heisenberg. You still aren’t observing the original particle to get it’s data.
It’s just a fudging the data.
To: Flick Lives
I was thinking of Stargate Destiny and the freaky spirit possession stones.
10
posted on
05/16/2021 9:45:25 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
To: Flick Lives
To: BenLurkin
No, it’s not a “way around” Heisenberg uncertainty.....Why? Because they are entangled in QS, there IS no “position” of the other drum you measured, it is in fact, in quantum state - all positions at once.
The reason they think it works is exactly because they didn’t measure the other drum. If you don’t “look” it is not synchronized with the first. If you look, it will be. You cannot assume it sync’d when you are not looking....double slit experiment all over again!
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: BenLurkin
“Scientist find a loophole in Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle”
Are they ‘sure’ about this?
14
posted on
05/16/2021 9:54:19 AM PDT
by
BobL
(I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
To: BenLurkin
From the Life Science web site:
“Will Science Someday Rule Out the Possibility of God?”
God Someday will Rule Out the Possibility of Science being correct about Him!
There, fixed it
15
posted on
05/16/2021 9:56:14 AM PDT
by
antidemoncrat
(somRead more at: https://economicti)
To: BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
I was always a bit uncertain about this.
17
posted on
05/16/2021 10:00:33 AM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Non-binary transnormativity is a construct of intersectionality. Leftist gobbledegook stinks.)
To: Conan the Librarian
> This doesn’t invalidate Heisenberg. You still aren’t observing the original particle to get it’s data. <
That was my first thought as well. They just made their “particle” really big. So maybe if a particle is big enough, you can measure it’s position without appearing to change its velocity.
But, hey. I got my degree from Faber College. So what do I know?
18
posted on
05/16/2021 10:01:05 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: BenLurkin
all at speeds faster than the speed of light Here's what caught my eye - how is this possible?
19
posted on
05/16/2021 10:06:26 AM PDT
by
Hardastarboard
(Don't wish your enemy ill; plan it.)
To: BenLurkin
20
posted on
05/16/2021 10:06:49 AM PDT
by
sonova
(That's what I always say sometimes.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson