Posted on 05/15/2021 12:37:08 AM PDT by SecAmndmt
(...) To use an old cliché, “the cat is out of the bag.”
For perhaps the first time since the COVID Plandemic started at the beginning of 2020, Americans who get most of their information solely through the corporate media, which is heavily funded by Big Pharma, got a dose of reality on just what exactly has been going on for the past 16 months or so, thanks to Tucker Carlson, and his 45-minute interview with Dr. Peter McCullough last week on his “Tucker Carlson Today” show on Fox News.
Dr. Peter McCullough is well-known to most Health Impact News readers, as we have featured his testimony before the Texas Senate as well as the U.S. Congress in previous articles. See:
CENSORED: Dr. Peter McCullough, MD testifies How Successful Home Treatments for COVID Make Experimental Vaccines Unnecessary (...)
(Excerpt) Read more at healthimpactnews.com ...
JayGalt wrote: “Cases are dropping due to the natural history of viruses. Worse in fall/winter, disappear in late spring.”
That implies the need to ensure the population is vaccinated prior to fall/winter.
you cannot get EUA for a vaccine if there are approved therapies
alstewartfan wrote: “The early efficacy of ivermectin and HCQ has been proven to my satisfaction. I have gotten the disease and the vaccine, BTW. Politics and low cost are the reasons that the feds have been fighting off-label prescriptions.”
“Politics and low cost” are part of the unsubstantiated anti-vaxxer propaganda.
“Still yet no statistical evidence the “vaccines” have accomplished anything meaningful.”
Israel is fully vaccinated and are reporting about 25 cases a day, versus up to 10,000 per day at the beginning of this year. Maybe other factors are involved, but that’s a pretty dramatic reduction in my book.
...and no, I’m not pro-vacc, or anti-vacc. It’s a personal choice and there are good reasons to go either way. For example, if you’re 25 years old and want to have kids, I’d say stay clear of the vaccines, at least until more is know about them (at which point the virus will likely be gone anyway). If you’re 94 years old, I might recommend differently.
As I recall, President Trump was the only one who was talking about treatment. Orange man bad, so the discussion was forbidden should people learn there is an inexpensive treatment to prevent serious illness and death, i.e. that President Trump was right (yet again).
I don’t believe that these therapies would have completely crushed the Wuhan flu. “Politics and low cost” were charges made long before the vaccine was made available. I have yet to hear one rational answer why most people cannot take these meds prophylactically or during early stages of the disease.
If you want to get vaccinated by all means do so. Do not presume to decide for anyone else.
Influenza kills thousands every year yet the vaccines cover the yearly mix poorly and most people do not vaccinate.
I survived COVID in Feb 2020 with no more inconvenience that a moderate flu. In 60 years I have had the flu 1-2x before, I think avoiding the flu shot has strengthened my natural immunity.
I trust nothing we are told about COVID and believe that the Nation has been subjected to mass experimentation, to what end we will not know for a long time.
The politics is clearly coming from the side of people pushing the vaccinations. It is very sad that people would strip choice from Americans, deny freedom of information to make decisions and subject children & young adults to an experimental agent with little or no benefit to themselves as individuals.
I received my 2nd Moderna shot on March 26. I’ve had 2 negative Covid tests. No side effects at all from the Moderna (?). No Covid symptoms at all. However, a couple of weeks ago I developed large red splotches on my toes that aren’t sore or itchy. Has anyone else had this condition develop? I searched online for “red splotches on toes” and was shocked to see the first results came back as “Covid Toe” (I’m not joking), so it must be fairly common?
“As of right now (May 2021, 14-15 months) there is no Mayo Clinic or Harvard Medical School protocol for multi-drug treatment of Covid out-patients.”
Doctors are actually being told, “Don’t treat Covid” even if they’re in the hospital, only until they need oxygen.
Maybe these s/e’s are the reason that so many CDC and NIH employees have refused the shots!
Makes you wonder how the human race survived without doctors, vaccines, and the government to watch out for us.
Here’s the video:
~~~~~~~
Thank you for posting that link to the Dr Peter McCullough/Tucker Carlson interview, Auntie M.
Fantastic interview, by Carlson.
Reviews the WORLDWIDE ‘group think’ in shutting down ANY talk of using the PROVEN HCQ and/or Ivermectin treatments and the zealous push for these experimental shots.
(In fact, docs in Queensland, Australia, per law, can be jailed 6 mos for even prescribing these known, successful treatments, per Dr McC.)
As well as how forcing these shots onto the general public is in direct conflict with the Nuremberg Code. (They review this code....for those who are NOT familiar with this important piece of history.)
How pregnant women and the CV infected were EXCLUDED from any trials.
And, much more.
A long (45 mins) interview that covers a LOT of ground/important info.
One note I found interesting.....Tucker asks Dr Mc, at least a couple of times, why this is happening (this full-force push, for these experimental shots, over safe, effective treatments) and, Dr Mc claims to not know. Is he ignorant, or simply avoiding the answer to that question?
We know (Dr Zelenko told us, early on) that these ‘vaccines’ would have had to gone through FULL trials, had there been any safe, effective treatments available as alternatives.
Paid Gubmit troll!
Thanks, downloading now because google/youtube will probably remove it.
Good clinical trials take time and lots of money. They were never meant to be used in real time to fight disease. I agree that's frustrating when the news is reporting so many deaths due to this disease.
An example of this (if you look at the references that accompany Dr. McCullough's paper) was a study to look at HCQ was terminated due to poor recruitment (reference #6 Clinical Trials link to NCT04358068).
The best US study reported to date that found a benefit is Dr. McCullough's reference #23 this study Arshad et el Henry Ford HCQ study.
But in this study still 13.5% died from COVID-19 who received HCQ alone; compared to 18.1% HCQ + azithromycin and 26.4% with standard care. This may seem promising until you read the editorial comment that indicates the pool of standard care patients was much smaller than the treatment groups and likely represented a proportion of patients who were either sicker or had more chronic illnesses that put them at risk or were DNR status etc. The editorial about the issues with the study can be found here: Editorial discussing strengths and weakness of Henry Ford study
The post exposure prophylaxis studies have been disappointing as well: Post exposure trial of HCQ.
In this trial you have about a 14% chance of coming down with COVID-19 when exposed to a household member or are a healthcare work exposed without protection. There was no statistical difference found between those who received HCQ post exposure and those who did not.
Now you could say that zinc wasn't used in these trials. But Dr. McCullough's algorithm does not use zinc either. The point of this is that HCQ is a weak therapy at best and does nothing but expose you to its side effects at worst.
While I would agree there is a component of prejudice against the use of repurposed drugs. If HCQ were the antiviral proponents believe it to be, we would have seen better numbers across all trials.
As an example of how clinical trials are slow to evolve and be published. The Ivermectin study done at Broward Health between April and May 2020. Did not get published online until Oct 13, 2020 and then made the print Journal Chest in Jan 2021. Broward Health Ivermectin Study.
This found a 13.3% mortality for ivermectin vs 24.5% mortality in controls on multivariate analysis (15.0 vs 25.2% on single variate analysis) . This however was a small study with 173 patients treated with ivermectin vs 107 without.
We are still waiting for higher powered trials on ivermectin. Yes I know there are some South American studies but I prefer US based studies. As for Ivermectin availability the ED doctor was more than happy to provide me with a prescription for Ivermectin when I came down with COVID-19 in February. I ended up getting the Eli Lily monoclonal antibody treatment which a couple of weeks later was deemed ineffective and changed to a dual monoclonal antibody treatment. So even the big drug companies are up against the same clinical trial issues as HCQ and Ivermectin.
Good idea.
Was thinking the same thing.
“So even the big drug companies are up against the same clinical trial issues as HCQ and Ivermectin.”
Really? NOT! The drug companies have no motivation to do either! Legal immunity in the first instance, and obscene embarrassment if CQ, HCQ, Ivermectin, etc., prove to be as or more effective than what they are doing/producing now. There is no way we will get the correct answers for either from big pharma.
alstewartfan wrote: “I don’t believe that these therapies would have completely crushed the Wuhan flu. “Politics and low cost” were charges made long before the vaccine was made available. I have yet to hear one rational answer why most people cannot take these meds prophylactically or during early stages of the disease.”
I don’t know why not. HCL is reasonably safe. When I was in Korea in the 70s, every table in the mess hall had a quart bottle of HCL right next to the salt and pepper. We were under orders to take a certain number of pills a week. I do not remember anyone falling dead after taking HCL. That said, I do not know if it is effective but it it safe for most people. Most of the adverse publicity of HCL was from a media out to prove DJT an idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.