Posted on 05/04/2021 8:54:48 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
In the new study, the researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.
The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells (which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2. This binding disrupted ACE2’s molecular signaling to mitochondria (organelles that generate energy for cells), causing the mitochondria to become damaged and fragmented.
Previous studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.
(Excerpt) Read more at salk.edu ...
It’s always something.
I don’t know this to be the case, but its certainly possible and it should be investigated and/or disclosed.
What if we the taxpayers funded this frankenvirus at the Wuhan lab through Fauci? The same Fauci who has shut down much of the nation and cost us trillions?
Isn’t at least worth some curiosity on the part of journalists?
Ooops! Sorry.
Please, somebody tell me -
If the covid “vaccine” trigger antibodies via growing covid spike proteins on your healthy cells, then, according to this article, how is that not a bad thing also???
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells: Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/
It is generally thought that the sole function of viral membrane fusion proteins is to allow the viruses to bind to the host cells for the purpose of viral entry into the cells, so that the genetic materials can be released and the viral replication and amplification can take place. However, recent observations suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can by itself trigger cell signaling that can lead to various biological processes. It is reasonable to assume that such events, in some cases, result in the pathogenesis of certain diseases.
Our laboratory only tested the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in lung vascular cells and those implicated in the development of PAH. However, this protein may also affect the cells of systemic and coronary vasculatures, eliciting other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease, systemic hypertension, and stroke.
In addition to cardiovascular cells, other cells that express ACE2 have the potential to be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which may cause adverse pathological events. Thus, it is important to consider the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced by the new COVID-19 vaccines triggers cell signaling events that promote PAH, other cardiovascular complications, and/or complications in other tissues/organs in certain individuals (Figure 3).
We will need to monitor carefully the long-term consequences of COVID-19 vaccines that introduce the spike protein into the human body. Furthermore, while human data on the possible long-term consequences of spike protein-based COVID-19 vaccines will not be available soon, it is imperative that appropriate experimental animal models are employed as soon as possible to ensure that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein does not elicit any signs of the pathogenesis of PAH or any other chronic pathological conditions.
Thanks for that link.
From the link....
(Conclusion)
...These vaccines should benefit elderly people with underlying conditions if they do not exhibit any acute adverse events. However, we need to consider their long-term consequences carefully, especially when they are administered to otherwise healthy individuals as well as young adults and children. In addition to evaluating data that will become available from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals as well as those who received the spike protein-based vaccines, further investigations of the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in human cells and appropriate animal models are warranted.....
Benefit the elderly IF they do not exhibit any acute adverse events????
What if they do? Then, it’s too late.
Need to consider longterm consequences carefully??? Especially when it comes to otherwise healthy individuals and children??
Gee.....really? Too bad these shots are being administered BEFORE any longterm consequences have been ‘carefully considered’.
Unreal. They admit they have no longterm studies (human, or animal) on these experitmental shots.
“damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own”
That doesn’t sound good if you got one of the jabs that rewires your cells to pump out the spike protein...
You immediately saw the connection. Yes, you are right.
From the article: “the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease”.
Then this from CDC: “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions for our cells to make a harmless piece of what is called the ‘spike protein.’ “
So the vaccine generates little harmful proteins that cause disease.
Any wonder why the folks are skeptical of anything the medical establishment and the politicians do?
Please, somebody tell me -
If the covid “vaccine” trigger antibodies via growing covid spike proteins on your healthy cells, then, according to this article, how is that not a bad thing also???
Similar question asked, here....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3956216/posts?page=10#10
Bottom of page 67.
8.3.5.1.Exposure During Pregnancy
An EDP occurs if:
~~ A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
~~~~~ A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Explainer: Pregnant women were excluded from Phase 1 of the trial and were required to take contraception.
Kinda makes it sound like Pfizer’s jab can spread something by inhalation or skin contact. Odd
There are many other concerning things in the report/plan.
A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Freaky as heck. 😱
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33051876/
Here, we show that SARS-CoV-2-infected cells express the Spike protein (S) at their surface and fuse with ACE2-positive neighboring cells. Expression of S without any other viral proteins triggers syncytia formation.
= = = = = = =
Hmmm, what happens with an mRNA jab which tells cells to start expressing spike proteins? Luck of the draw as to which cells take in the lipid coating or adenovirus?
btt
2023 for completion of 3rd clinical trial would mean the public are uninformed, misguided, deceived, guinea pigs.
With the vaccines you get them in lower concentrations and in limited amounts. With a viral infection, exponentially / massively more, of course.
But I would suspect that is what may be causing the blood clots. COVID19 infections are known to cause bad blood clots and what comes with them, including fatalities.
J&J and AZ vaccines use DNA to enter the nucleus of the cells which then encode the mRNA to send into the cell's cytoplasm to instruct the ribosomes to make the spike proteins. mRNA dissolves after this, but as long as the cell remains alive, the DNA in the nucleus can continue encode more and more of the mRNA. I would image that is why it is only 1 dose and the concentration and quantity of the proteins are higher since the mRNA can continually be produced while the cell remains alives, vs. Pfizer or Moderna where the mRNA, along with its instructions to make the spike protein, simply disappear without being reproduced, and if the spike proteins are the cause of the blood clots, why the instances of clots are not as common with the Pfizer / Moderna vaccines.
So that's the tradeoff - minimal, lower concentrations of the proteins with vaccines or massive concentrations of them with a full blown infection. In addition, with the vaccines, they would not be numerous, small compact crowns of them, either.
Well I don’t want my cells artificially rewired!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.