Posted on 04/29/2021 12:03:23 PM PDT by Fitzy_888
(EXCERPT: Frequently asked questions.)
VACCINE RELATED
If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?
If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.
Another attempt to get ride of private employment. The v”vaccine” manufacturers are immune from lawsuits, but the employers who mandate vaccines are not.
Not what I expected.
Am I reading this that if you have an adverse reaction and it’s recorded, it could be used in a workers compensation claim?
WOW!!@ The Drug Companies receive Blanket Immunity and the Employers acting on Guidance and Dictates by the State are held LIABLE! Un frikkin believable!
Curious if anyone who is getting these vaccines has to sign any paperwork? Any vaccines I’ve received in the past required signing an informed consent form. I understand that there’s no informed consent with the COVID vaccine, which tells me that you’re basically a guinea pig. Is my understanding skewed?
Can you sue the company?
OSHA shouldn’t exist. Thank Nixon.
Just a note, the question directly below this one states that if it’s RECOMMENDED, they’re not required to record adverse reactions.
Recordkeeping mandates are only in effect for employers who REQUIRE vaccination.
But this also stops the government from mandated vaccinations as they will be liable.
Unfortunately, when something is Recommended by the State, it means it is mandatory and you face severe consequences in the form of monetary penalties and fines if you don’t follow their “recommendations”, this also goes for Employers, except there is no Penalty other than being FIRED!
Recommended means Mandatory
“Am I reading this that if you have an adverse reaction and it’s recorded, it could be used in a workers compensation claim?”
OSHA and workers’ comp are two distinct and separate functions. I’m not sure about it being a workers’ comp issue (that would probably have to be settled in court), but OSHA making it recordable does not automatically make it compensable under workers’ comp.
BTT
I take this to mean that an employer can be held liable for an adverse reaction -IF- the employer REQUIRES the vaccine as a condition of employment.
So if you get the vaccine and die - same as dying while on the job.
It would also be interesting to know .... if an employee requests an ADA reasonable accomodation to NOT get the vaccine. Say the emplyee is known to be alergy senstive.
What would happen in this case. I would also imagine that any adverse reaction would be also liable???
I’m just referencing the link for this thread. OSHA’s specific guidance is that adverse reactions to vaccines administered as a mandatory part of employment must be recorded whereas adverse reactions to vaccines taken voluntarily are not. It’s in the article for this thread. Feel free to peruse.
If you're an employer and you've managed to keep your business afloat for the last year by having your staff work at home, you'd be a damned fool to ever let them come back to the workplace.
In addition to all the cost savings, just think of all the bullsh!t you don't have to worry about anymore if your employees never enter your place of work. No more OSHA claims, no more sexual harassment lawsuits, no more employees leaving early to pick up a sick kid at school, a drastic reduction of sick days, etc.
If this keeps employers from mandating Covid “jabs”, that is a very good thing.
Curious if anyone who is getting these vaccines has to sign any paperwork? Any vaccines I’ve received in the past required signing an informed consent form. I understand that there’s no informed consent with the COVID vaccine, which tells me that you’re basically a guinea pig. Is my understanding skewed?
~~~~~~~~~
That sounds right.
The linked document is a research paper stating that informed consent content (e.g., risks of vaccine documented) was ‘sufficiently obscured’ from vaccine trial participants last year that informed consent could not have occurred, and advises any future patients be cautioned about the risks of ADE, adn still, nothing.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Since the vaccines are not FDA approved or licensed, but instead are only Emergency Use Authorized and are experiments - no consent form.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.