Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unusual Material Features Spontaneous Superconducting Currents – Why It Superconducts at All Is Completely Unknown
https://scitechdaily.com ^ | MARCH 16, 2021 | By MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL PHYSICS OF SOLIDS

Posted on 03/16/2021 11:11:29 AM PDT by Red Badger

Superconductivity is a complete loss of electrical resistance. Superconductors are not merely very good metals: it is a fundamentally different electronic state. In normal metals, electrons move individually, and they collide with defects and vibrations in the lattice. In superconductors, electrons are bound together by an attractive force, which allows them to move together in a correlated way and avoid defects.

In a very small number of known superconductors, the onset of superconductivity causes spontaneous electrical currents to flow. These currents are very different from those in a normal metal wire: they are built into the ground state of the superconductor, and so they cannot be switched off. For example, in a sheet of a superconducting material, currents might appear that flow around the edge, as shown in the figure.

This is a very rare form of superconductivity, and it always indicates that the attractive interaction is something unusual. Sr2RuO4 is one famous material where this type of superconductivity is thought to occur. Although the transition temperature is low – Sr2RuO4 superconducts only below 1.5 Kelvin – the reason why it superconducts at all is completely unknown. To explain the superconductivity in this material has become a major test of physicists’ understanding of superconductivity in general. Theoretically, it is very difficult to obtain spontaneous currents in Sr2RuO4 from standard models of superconductivity, and so if they are confirmed then a new model for superconductivity – an attractive force that is not seen in other materials – might be required.

Left: schematic of superconductivity-induced spontaneous electrical currents in Sr2RuO4. Right: crystal structure of Sr2RuO4. Credit: © MPI CPfS

----------------------------------------------------------------

The way that these electrical currents are detected is subtle. Subatomic particles known as muons are implanted into the sample. The spin of each muon then precesses in whatever magnetic field exists at the muon stopping site. In effect, the muons act as sensitive detectors of magnetic field, that can be placed inside the sample. From such muon implantation experiments it has been found that spontaneous magnetic fields appear when Sr2RuO4 becomes superconducting, which shows that there are spontaneous electrical currents.

However, because the signal is subtle, researchers have questioned whether it is in fact real. The onset of superconductivity is a major change in the electronic properties of a material, and maybe this subtle additional signal appeared because the measurement apparatus was not properly tuned.

In this work, researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, the Technical University of Dresden, and the Paul Scherrer Institute (Switzerland) have shown that when uniaxial pressure is applied to Sr2RuO4, the spontaneous currents onset at a lower temperature than the superconductivity. In other words, the transition splits into two: first superconductivity, then spontaneous currents. This splitting has not been clearly demonstrated in any other material, and it is important because it shows definitively that the second transition is real. The spontaneous currents must be explained scientifically, not as a consequence of imperfect measurement. This may require a major re-write of our understanding of superconductivity.

Reference: “Split superconducting and time-reversal symmetry-breaking transitions in Sr2RuO4 under stress” by Vadim Grinenko, Shreenanda Ghosh, Rajib Sarkar, Jean-Christophe Orain, Artem Nikitin, Matthias Elender, Debarchan Das, Zurab Guguchia, Felix Brückner, Mark E. Barber, Joonbum Park, Naoki Kikugawa, Dmitry A. Sokolov, Jake S. Bobowski, Takuto Miyoshi, Yoshiteru Maeno, Andrew P. Mackenzie, Hubertus Luetkens, Clifford W. Hicks and Hans-Henning Klauss, 4 March 2021, Nature Physics. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-021-01182-7


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: cooperpairs; sr2ruo4; stringtheory; superconductivity; symmetrybreaking; timereversal

1 posted on 03/16/2021 11:11:29 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What did I do with that Ruthenium? I thought I left it next to the Strontium.


2 posted on 03/16/2021 11:17:48 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

I love how they’re able to see all of this at work, but I’m curious how it’ll apply practically considering the unnaturally low temperature required? Or maybe they’re doing it as a possible space-based function?


3 posted on 03/16/2021 11:21:18 AM PDT by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The little square with arrows on it does nothing to explain even what they think they are talking about.


4 posted on 03/16/2021 11:21:48 AM PDT by webheart (COVID was not worth the economic misery that it took to keep me from getting it for 7 months..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Black metals matter


5 posted on 03/16/2021 11:25:08 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

6 posted on 03/16/2021 11:27:54 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Maybe it’s next to the Ginsbergium,..................


7 posted on 03/16/2021 11:28:44 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not once does the article mention the name of the material: Strontium ruthenate. Why?


8 posted on 03/16/2021 11:28:48 AM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Somebody would try and corner the market in it?.................


9 posted on 03/16/2021 11:29:55 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What is the strength of the ‘base state’ spontaneous current?

Could it just be the traversal through the planet or sun’s magnetic field that induces it?

SOMETHING has to be inducing it.


10 posted on 03/16/2021 11:36:54 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Cosmic rays or spontaneous nuclear degeneration?...............


11 posted on 03/16/2021 11:38:42 AM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Probably in the same column as Rubegoldbergium.


12 posted on 03/16/2021 11:56:46 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Every metal on earth is traversing through the solar and planetary magnetic fields at approximately the same rate as a sample of this stuff, so if it’s simply induction from those fields, we’d expect to see the same thing in every metal, varying probably based on how conductive they are.


13 posted on 03/16/2021 11:59:19 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

That was the Rubidium.


14 posted on 03/16/2021 11:59:20 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Caveat Emperor: Comitii asinorum atque rhinocerorum delendi sunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...

Superconductivity Ping
Commercial Photography
· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·
(if you're wondering why Bardeen looks familiar, he also shared the Nobel for invention of the transistor)

15 posted on 03/16/2021 12:14:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Superconductors exclude outside magnetic fields. This is why they hover over a conductor. Some fellow ever made a Mobius strip race track and filmed a superconductor racing on it. It is on YouTube somewhere.


16 posted on 03/16/2021 12:29:01 PM PDT by Nateman (Keep Liberty Alive! Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Superconductivity is a complete loss of electrical resistance.”

Impossible, but can be close using liquid helium.


17 posted on 03/16/2021 1:41:45 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi
<>"Not once does the article mention the name of the material: Strontium ruthenate. Why?"<>

That would be 'acting White'.

18 posted on 03/16/2021 4:36:55 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (The Mob rises; the Monarchy trembles; the blade sings its lone song...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
<>"SOMETHING has to be inducing it."<>

Who's on their phone, Dammit?

19 posted on 03/16/2021 4:40:20 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (The Mob rises; the Monarchy trembles; the blade sings its lone song...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson