Posted on 03/03/2021 3:03:40 AM PST by SecAmndmt
(...)
A front-page article appeared in the FranceSoir newspaper about findings on the Nakim website regarding what some experts are calling “the high mortality caused by the vaccine.”
The paper interviews Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit’s Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ about their research and data analysis.
They claim that Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.”
Dr Hervé Seligmann works at the Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. He is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality. He has a B. Sc. In Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written over 100 scientific publications.
(...)
(Excerpt) Read more at healthimpactnews.com ...
MayflowerMadam wrote: “I guess I did miss the results of “extensive testing”. “Extensive” would include LONG-TERM effects, which could not have been done within the trial period.”
If there was a single confirmed instance of the vaccine causing a death, the anti-vaxxer cult would have started at least 20 threads on that instance. I’ve seen none, have you?
When will these vaccines be removed from experimental use status and be given full clearance along with liability to the manufacturers for their product? Vaccines are labeled experimental for a reason.
“the anti-vaxxer cult would have started at least 20 threads”
I doubt if there are many anti-vaxxer cultists on FR; maybe a few. Implying that those of us who regularly get vaccines for flu, shingles, pneumonia, are anti-vaxxers is just weird and disingenuous.
There is a test for Covid specific T Cells. Costs about $150. Adaptive Biotechnologies. https://www.t-detect.com/
Maybe given your knowledge you can comment on the test. AB is a credible company. $150 for a test including the on site blood draw seems like something very different than what you are describing.
I don't have time to break that test down today or tomorrow, but I will look at it. Thanks for the tip. It's been a while since I was doing T cell work.
Just tried the link... looks like it’s already been pulled.
love it how the biggest problem is misrepresentation of the fact...there is a tendency to take our beliefs and look for articles that support your biases.
Bookmark
“love it how the biggest problem is misrepresentation of the fact...there is a tendency to take our beliefs and look for articles that support your biases.”
It is the biggest problem we have among like-minded and like-thinking folks. Some folks we largely agree with will offer opinions they have received only because the opinion fits some general narrative of belief we have, whether that opinion is factually based or not. Then our enemies get ammunition against us by pointing to the false “evidence” those opinions used in their argument.
As I pointed out, I am not in the vaccine promoting majority, but I can see a wrongly evidenced anti-vaccine opinion, and say so.
Astra Zeneca (sp?) is:
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/067/533/096/original/9fea7346e08a9256.mp4
MM is correct in her statement.
A decision was made in March or April of 2020 that we would need a vaccine before 2025 or 2026. Thus, President Trump created Operation Warp Speed.
I supported that decision then, and I support it now.
Sometimes you don't get to know all the answers. In medicine, this happens frequently.
We are living in a "culture of safety", which explains why children are not going to school, among other social dysfunctions.
I was vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine on 12/16/20 and 1/7/21, I'm glad I was, and I will have no regrets if it turns out to have been a miscalculation.
As always, "your mileage may vary"
Most horrible, stupid analogy ever.
I would change what you wrote to everyone needs to be allowed without coersion to make their own decisions.
That’s the other vaccine I was looking at. And from what I hear it’s the only one that doesn’t use cells from murdered babies.
Isn’t Novavax also a mRNA type vaccination?
Oh trust me, I’m in no hurry to get it, and truth to tell, I think I already had the crud way back in Feb of last year before anyone knew what it was. But I’m also keeping my options open.
That is bullshit. If they are around high risk people, one could assume those people are vaccinated! I am asking why a healthy low risk person would get it.
no, novavax is not another mrna vaccine.
they put a bunch of the virus’ external spikes (just the spikes, no viral genetics)... together and (with an adjuvant to stimulate your immune response, which one I am endeavoring to find out since all they publish is that it is their “proprietary one”
anyway,
what the use is the spikes from the virus exterior and not the virus/genetics itself
your body then reacts to those spikes (creates antibodies to the Corona virus)
so this novavax sounds very much like a normal kind of vaccination (where, say, killed or stunned=out viruses are used to provoke your body’s immune response).... and it does not appear to make use of or hijack your body’s cells to manufacture corona viruses
so anyway it sounds promising and I am continuing to try to find out more details but it sure does sound better, imho, than the first two vaccines that are in use right now
Agree! Amazing the willingness and eagerness to take this vaccine for something that is 99.8% survivable.
We have a better chance of dying in a car crash than this “virus”.
“Just tried the link... looks like it’s already been pulled.”
I just tried it and it still works
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.