It took an expert mathematician to come up with that?
You and I already came up with that on our own.
No they didn’t. It is election fraud.
Can you link to the OAN video at a site where it runs?
No chit! 😤
I guess an overall vote dump for Biteme of 4 million votes between 0300 hrs to 0400 hrs (in 7 swing states) the next day would give anyone pause.
5.56mm
We know but apparently we the people don’t have standing.
He’ll be marked as a Trump supporter and labeled as a terrorist.
There is a concept in physics and mathematics, which is used to get the outcome desired, regardless of the computations involved. It is called the “Finagle Constant”, which magically and automatically converts the wrong findings into the “correct” outcome being sought.
This “Finagle Constant” may be either negative or positive, and it changes from application to application, rarely transferable from one set of circumstances to another. It is also known as the Variable Constant, and may be modified by the “Bougerre Factor” as needed, or even the “Diddle Coefficient”.
But it is never, ever “wrong”.
A record of data is useful. It indicates that you have been busy.
To study a subject, first understand it thoroughly.
In case of doubt, make it sound convincing.
Draw your curves then plot your data.
Do not believe in luck. Rely on it.
Always leave room when writing a report to add an explanation if it doesn’t work (the rule of the-way-out).
Too little, too late.
well I’m glad to see all these mathmeticians ( this makes about the 4th one at least), that understand what the peasant understands without even picking up a pencil - the election was stolen.
And if the Brookings Institute has their way, all elections will be stolen from now on
Brookings Institute Election Scorecard:
https://www.brookings.edu/research/voting-by-mail-in-a-pandemic-a-state-by-state-scorecard/
Bearing in mind this is THE Brookings Institute, the question remains, who created this scorecard on what authority and how many states are dutifully complying with this scorecard?
Has any court actually looked at the evidence of fraud?
I believe the DNC/ANTIFA led mayhem at the US capitol on the 6th had one purpose - to cut short the challenges and prevent the presentation of evidence; evidence that would have forced traitor Pence to grant the states time to sort out the electors.
My basketball analogy:
Suppose your favorite basketball team, wearing red uniforms, has led more or less the whole gave and is ahead of the team wearing blue uniforms by a score of 65-50 with 5 minutes left to play, not yet a blowout, but a fairly comfortable lead. At this point the the fans, i.e., the observers, are kicked out of the arena and the rest of the game is observed only by “officials”, but there is a live data feed of the score to the outside as it changes.
The data feed shows that the team in blue is scoring at at will in the last few minutes of the game. The game ends on a 25-5 run for the blue team to make the final score 75-70. The blue team’s 25-5 run means it scored 83% of the remaining points scored in the game. But a few instant replay videos leak out that show, 100%, without any doubt, that errors were made by the “officials”. Also, the data feed of the score shows that some points by the red team are actually counted on the scoreboard as points for the blue team. It’s 100% known that this happened, but it’s hard to tell exactly how many points were changed like this. The data feed also shows that the score for the red team actually went backwards at times, and also shows fractional points being scored at times.
Then, as the season goes on, the same things happen again and again: the 15 point lead with 5 minutes to play, the fans being kicked out, errors proven by leaked instant replay video, the fantastic events, the points changing from the red team to the blue team, yet the “officials” say the blue team came back and won again, and again, and again. And this happens FIVE GAMES IN A ROW!!!
Most of the press claim to be neutral, but it’s an open secret that they are foam-at-the-mouth blue team fans, say there is “no evidence” of anything wrong and refuse to investigate. They are Fraud Deniers.
I am shocked to hear this, shocked I say.