Posted on 01/27/2021 7:09:54 AM PST by McQ444
Former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) has issued a warning to America, declaring that ex-CIA Director John Brennan, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), and the oligarchs in Big Tech are "domestic enemies." In a new video message on Tuesday, Gabbard warned that Brennan, Schiff, and Silicon Valley pose an even greater threat to American liberty than the rioters who stormed the Capitol earlier this month.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
“During the Democratic debates, she is the one that concerned me the most.”
In hindsight, we wish she had been nominated. If they were going to steal the election anyway, (and they were), a president Gabbard would be something I could live with.
I don’t agree with a lot of her policy stands, but I think she cares about America, and I respect her. Heck, I’d rather see her as president than many of the “Republicans”.
What if, her and Trump team up. It’s funny, that she probably has much more support from Trump supporters now, than from Democrats.
This is a bigger issue than just the traditional Republican/Democrat Conservative/Liberal thing.
Regardless of where you are politically, these things should horrify you.
Before getting too enamored, ask yourself this : Did she vote to impeach Trump without cause? Did she do it once? TWICE?,
Can’t figure her out, maybe she’s auditioning for a media job to make millions.
Consider the State she represented.
She is not the object of their false accusations and projections. I will give her some credit for at least standing up, but she is testing so-called moderate Democrats to see how they are responding to the outrageous attacks on Americans by the Left.
I do not like Alex Jones but he put together a nice montage of the Left projecting their own flaws, Brennan, Couric, etc. They all sound like the old USSR! The subtitles during Psaki’s presser are on target:
https://theresistance.video/watch?id=600cb07242993508da58bc9a
Evil always accuses others of what Evil is guilty of doing, “domestic terrorism”.
Like, uh, duuuuh.
We could literally see a Democrat primary in 2024 of her vs the ho.
—
and the winner vs Ivanka in the general. But the Dem will still win; they are NOT giving up absolute power any time soon - not willingly and certainly not in any election.
That is where I get the idea that she may be the “liberal populist” in the next election.
Frankly, I found myself liking a lot of what she was saying during the election compared to the other democrats. She seemed to be the most reasonable and sincere - which is scary to us consrvatives because, well, she’s a supporter of the Democrat platform and has come out in support of things that are poison to conservatives.
So my concern is that she could be a solid contender in the eyes of the middle - and even some republicans.
I couldn’t imagine ANY Republican congressman or Senator having the BALLS to call Brennan a domestic enemy, which he is.
So kudos to her, and I respect Gabbard for this, and her criticism of the deep state. She will get a large audience, without a doubt.
Congress is a domestic enemy. That finding presents a conundrum, similar to the one presented when the government is in a state of revolution against the people and against the constitution.
twice
Tulsi Gabbard backed Bernie in 2016.
Abolish Capital Punishment
End cash bail reform
End Minimum Sentences
End Private Prisons
Mandate paper ballots
Bring back Glass-Steagall
Raise the federal minimum wage to $15/hour
Supports broad paid family and medical leave plans
College should be free
Expand or fix existing student debt-relief programs
Eliminate the Electoral College
Close existing nuclear power plants.
Ban assault weapons.
Favors universal gun background checks.
Limit third trimester abortions.
Rethink healthcare.
Supports negotiating for Medicare, international reference pricing for drugs and promoting generics.
Supports Medicare for all but would accept Medicare for some.
Supports citizenship for Dreamers.
Pay for infrastructure by ending wars.
Slash defense spending.
Bring our troops home.
Legalize Marijuana.
Eliminate tax breaks for offshoring.
I copied this but it’s not word for word.
https://www.politico.com/2020-election/candidates-views-on-the-issues/tulsi-gabbard/
That is my theory, also.
The state didn’t matter. Virtually the whole damn Demonrat House caucus votes between 90-100% leftist, regardless of where they came from. She didn’t run for another term because she ran afoul of the corrupt and evil HI Demonrat party establishment, but unless when they release the voting stats from 2020 that she dramatically moved to the right, her record didn’t deviate from most any other member of that party up until then.
On December 8, 2016, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists Act
https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/video-rep-tulsi-gabbard-introduces-legislation-stop-arming-terrorists
Follow the links in the article.
VIDEO: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Legislation to Stop Arming Terrorists
December 8, 2016
Press Release
Washington, DC—Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists Act today. The legislation would prohibit the U.S. government from using American taxpayer dollars to provide funding, weapons, training, and intelligence support to groups like the Levant Front, Fursan al Ha and other allies of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, al-Qaeda and ISIS, or to countries who are providing direct or indirect support to those same groups.
The legislation is cosponsored by Reps. Peter Welch (D-VT-AL), Barbara Lee (D-CA-13), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA-48), and Thomas Massie (R-KY-04), and supported by the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) and the U.S. Peace Council.
Video of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s speech on the House floor is available here
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said, “Under U.S. law it is illegal for any American to provide money or assistance to al-Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups. If you or I gave money, weapons or support to al-Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail. Yet the U.S. government has been violating this law for years, quietly supporting allies and partners of al-Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government.[i]
“The CIA has also been funneling weapons and money through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and others who provide direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. This support has allowed al-Qaeda and their fellow terrorist organizations to establish strongholds throughout Syria, including in Aleppo.
“A New York Times article confirmed that ‘rebel groups’ supported by the U.S. ‘have entered into battlefield alliances with the affiliate of al-Qaeda in Syria, formerly known as al Nusra.’ This alliance has rendered the phrase ‘moderate rebels’ meaningless. Reports confirm that ‘every armed anti-Assad organization unit in those provinces [of Idlib and Aleppo] is engaged in a military structure controlled by [al-Qaeda’s] Nusra militants.’
“A recent Wall Street Journal article reported that many rebel groups are ‘doubling down on their alliance’ with al Nusra. Some rebel groups are renewing their alliance, while others, like Nour al-Din al-Zinki, a former CIA-backed group and one of the largest factions in Aleppo are joining for the first time. “The Syria Conquest Front—formerly known as the al-Qaeda-linked Nusra Front—is deeply intermingled with armed opposition groups of all stripes across Syria’s battlefields.”
“The CIA has long been supporting a group called Fursan al Haqq, providing them with salaries, weapons and support, including surface to air missiles. This group is cooperating with and fighting alongside an al-Qaeda affiliated group trying to overthrow the Syrian government. The Levant Front is another so-called moderate umbrella group of Syrian opposition fighters. Over the past year, the United States has been working with Turkey to give this group intelligence support and other forms of military assistance. This group has joined forces with al-Qaeda’s offshoot group in Syria.
“This madness must end. We must stop arming terrorists. The Government must end this hypocrisy and abide by the same laws that apply to its’ citizens.
“That is why I’ve introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists bill—legislation based on congressional action during the Iran-Contra affair to stop the CIA’s illegal arming of rebels in Nicaragua. It will prohibit any Federal agency from using taxpayer dollars to provide weapons, cash, intelligence, or any support to al-Qaeda, ISIS and other terrorist groups, and it will prohibit the government from funneling money and weapons through other countries who are directly or indirectly supporting terrorists,” concluded Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.
Why are you on their side Tulsi?
What the hell is she still doing in the Democrat Party?
If she keeps this up, she’s going to lose her committee seats...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.