That's how facial recognition works, it charts the deviance in polygon data points of facial features.
Not the same face.
Posted on 01/20/2021 8:06:57 AM PST by ransomnote
Good to hear! Hang tough, the both of you!
Nitecap
His sign up date was Oct. 2019—no coinky dinky I’m sure. Starve him/her/it.
Yes it was the speech in the afternoon of the 6th, where PDJT said for people to go home.
I do not think there are that many truly evil people in the world, but there are a lot of gullible people and people who do not really pay enough attention to things until things really impact them.
The whole mask thing shows that. The numbers of people who did not put 2 and 2 together when it came to Covid cropping up right after impeachment failed show just how easily people can be fooled.
This is one reason why I am not bullish on the idea that Trump has overwhelming popularity so much as very enthusiastic support from a certain percentage of people who voted for him compared to a Romney or McCain who did not have enthusiastic support from but a smidgling of the people who voted for them and mainly had people vote for them because they understood Obama’s policies to be harmful.
When it comes to Trump, for many people who sensed something is very wrong with the current zeitgeist, as it were, they found their man, finally. They found a man to get behind, and they got behind him hard. Hence why Trump got such large crowds.
But many others are still asleep and only voted for Trump because they understand Biden’s policies are the typical bad liberal policies you get from a demonrat. Most of Biden’s voters voted against Trump because of Orange Man Bad Syndrome.
However, I do think a handful of the Biden voters awakened in the past couple months and a handful more have this week and will do so in the near future as they hear about what Biden’s people are up to.
Many people just don’t pay attention and don’t know things they should know. I recall the story of this woman who voted for Buttigeg in the Iowa caucus and then found out less than a half hour after doing so he was homosexual and wanted to change her vote.
Biden’s hardcore enthusiastic supporters are probably only a tenth the size of Trump’s. Most of his support is soft and his voters, whatever their true number, really only voted against Trump and not for Biden and so are not all that committed to Biden.
The awakening process is going to take differing amounts of time and differing facets of information to be revealed in order to get started in different people.
The soft Trump voters— those who voted not for Trump so much as against Demonrats—will awaken more quickly because they already “get” some things.
Ironically, I think that when some Democrats finally do awaken, they will be some of the best MAGA people because converts often are the most committed, fervent supporters in a righteous cause.
Go to the 25 minute mark of this episode of M3thods where they discuss a Twitter post about a guy who voted for Biden and got flack for it from his friend or co-worker and the response to him from another friend he complained to about this. (I think I have this right).
The Biden voter is not really awakened yet, but the response from the other guy was a good wake up call to him.
https://rumble.com/vd5dgp-m3thods-to-madness-w-412anon-and-bradcgz-ep.-067.html
I seriously think its pretty hard to beat tracking, and as I am not a danger, I don’t bother with that. I use ddgo because of the quality of the return data.
Ie, the SRA search is scrubbed of all references that are harmful to the illuminati, whereas in the ddgo return, its at the top of the page.
If you are channeling Sherlock Holmes, don’t use a slab of slate as a magnifying glass.
Oh yes, was in DC around forty years ago and it was an amazing place although the way I hear it described now it sounds like it's gone downhill at a rapid pace.
I went back and forth on the photo. Look at Bill’s shoes in the one where Hills looks short. He’s standing on aslope, his feet are pointing out and down and he is above her.
So you’ve got that.
On the other hand, that doesn’t look like Hillary to me. The brow area, eyebrows and head position don’t look right.
Bill’s feet sure got a lot bigger in the left photo and and I’m not convinced that looks like Bill either.
Damn masks.
Funny they should try a push like saying ECW *IS* Q. Q mentioned ECW at least twice so when he was moved into DSoD I thought the pieces were moving right into place. But I never thought he WAS Q or had any reason to think so.
That page cannot be found on White House site.
The masked “Bill” on the left has really long feet.
Great report, thanks!
That's how facial recognition works, it charts the deviance in polygon data points of facial features.
Not the same face.
https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/22/22244413/amazon-union-vote-decision-appeal-alabama-us-labor-board
Amazon tries to delay warehouse union vote in Alabama
The company is pushing for the election to happen in person
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am not saying the majority of Americans are pure hearted saints but most believe in God and want good over evil and believe in morality even if they are not perfect.
“maybe her double?”
Well, when I first say the picture I thought he was posing with Jill Biden, but when I looked closer the eyes were wrong.
In 2016 It was debated that she had a double since she was heading for her Medivac Van and she got the Vapors and they had to drag her inside. 2 hours later she (or the double) was walking around and posing in front of Chelsa’s apartment.
Thinking a double was possible then, but what need for one now?
Spinal compression?
https://www.spine-health.com/video/spinal-compression-fracture-video
https://www.berkeleywellness.com/self-care/preventive-care/article/why-you-shrink-you-age
“Estimates vary, but on average people lose ¼ to ½ inch every decade after age 40 or 50, with losses increasing in later years, and women generally losing more than men. Research from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, for example, found that women lost an average of 2 inches between the ages of 30 and 70 (and just over 3 inches by age 80). Men lost a little more than 1 inch by age 70 (and 2 inches by 80). But averages hide wide variability: Some people lose an inch or more in a single decade, some shrink only after age 60 or 70, and a few don’t shrink at all.”
So...maybe 2 1/2 inches going from heels to flats? 3 Inches loss in spinal column. So.. pretty close to 6 inches?
Might account for it. What do you think?
Yup. “China Dave”.
And that is the working plan. Or so it seems...
((hugs))
~ lyby
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.