Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/05/2021 5:22:28 AM PST by AggregateThreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AggregateThreat

Can’t have the peasantry able to protect themselves from the armed agents of the state who we send to enforce whatever petty edicts and unjust taxes we choose to impose upon them, now can we?

Sic Semper Tyrannis.


2 posted on 01/05/2021 5:26:21 AM PST by SharpenedEdge (Stockpile. Prepare. Arm. Train. A Storm is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

If the police are allowed to have it, the citizens should be allowed


3 posted on 01/05/2021 5:29:57 AM PST by Reno89519 (Buy American, Hire American! End All Worker Visa Programs. Replace Visa Workers w/ American Worker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

What about the owner of the local Quicky Mart.....He no longer can be protected?

Damn liberal Marxist New Yorkers!


4 posted on 01/05/2021 5:36:39 AM PST by nevergore (I have a terrible rash on my covfefe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

Conclusive proof that gun control has nothing to do with protecting the public, but leaving the public defenseless.

Maybe we should call them “gun violence prevention chest masks.”


5 posted on 01/05/2021 5:36:43 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

Slowly but surely the communists are making their move.


7 posted on 01/05/2021 5:38:29 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

Unconstitutional for sure.


9 posted on 01/05/2021 5:47:13 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

This is a clear violation of the Second Amendment. As the Supreme Court noted in Heller, the dictionary definition of “arms” at the time of ratification was “weapons for offence, and armour for defence.”

If further proof is needed that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear armour, I seem to recall, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, that several cities hosted militia units armed and equipped in the manner of Napoleonic heavy cavalry (hussars, cuirassiers, and the like). These units were manned by wealthy citizens who almost certainly provided their own armor. Might be a fun research project to confirm this.

Given that the 2nd Amendment applies, I don’t see how this law meets any level of scrutiny. What legitimate government interest is served here?


12 posted on 01/05/2021 5:56:07 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

I’ll believe that we can turn around our regression to third world status when progressives fear coming out of their hovels.


13 posted on 01/05/2021 6:02:41 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

More Gubbermint overreach. Up theirs! If I wrote what I really think, I’d be banned from FR!


14 posted on 01/05/2021 6:03:05 AM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

More absurdity.

Imagine, how horrifying it is to use defensive protection.


15 posted on 01/05/2021 6:08:02 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs. I )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat
Time to raid some manufacturers and grab their shipping records?

I saw an episode of Adam-12, recently. A guy took a couple of shots at Reed and Malloy. They had to call in and get body armor. What was brought looked like a dental hygienists lead x-day apron, complete with groin flap. Had to laugh.

16 posted on 01/05/2021 6:15:29 AM PST by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

Meanwhile, Cuomo is closing three prisons...


18 posted on 01/05/2021 6:22:52 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

IOW, they want people to have NO ability to protect themselves at all.

Just like England.

Let the criminals run rampant and sacrifice the citizenry.

Just who do the dems think are going to produce all the goods they will still demand so they can continue to live in the manner to which they are accustomed?


20 posted on 01/05/2021 6:46:07 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

Does that include police and private security?


21 posted on 01/05/2021 6:48:15 AM PST by nonliberal (Caput gerat lupinum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

They want to make sure they can kill us when the time comes.


22 posted on 01/05/2021 6:56:29 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

Who, exactly, will enforce that?

They must be identifiable and locatable if push came to shove.


25 posted on 01/05/2021 7:15:22 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (400,000,000 Guns. 8,000,000,000 Rounds of Ammo per YEAR. I like our odds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AggregateThreat

So Bullet Proof Backpacks for kids/Adults will be illegal?


26 posted on 01/05/2021 7:53:21 AM PST by Garvin (The spread of communism anywhere, threatens freedom everywhere. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson