Posted on 12/22/2020 8:07:35 PM PST by djf
There ya go!
not necessarily, thats a flawed assumption
fauci fedgov deliberately gave false info to hospitals and such to run many more cycles than they should have,
then came out a way later and said anything over 25 cycles isn’t reliable
after they told them to run 30,35,40 cycles to generate massive false positive cases
The PCR test looks for these fragments and then replicates them up to level that gives a positive test result.
Pretty sure that many of these tests are generic corona virus and not Covid-19 specific. This is a bummer because the common cold is a corona virus. Interestingly, we have not heard much about the perennial cold season, but we do see a lot of very mild covid -19 cases with cold like symptoms. :-)
.
Bkmk
You are presuming Fauci or anyone at the time knew any better. That is debatable.
Thank you. Excellent research.
“The WHO test kits should find a positive result in all humans.”
Thus, every positive test result for Covid19 is suspicious and not trustworthy.
Thankfully, Covid19 can be treated by common medications without a prescription.
no
pcr tests are not new
it was well-known 25 cycles or more and the results are not reliable
they did itmon purpose to grossly overinflate the “positive” cases
“We are all positive! :”
Good. Im tired of wearing those stupid masks.
It’s such a powerhouse website that the “About Us” page is completely blank. The author “Derek Coons” doesn’t have any information about himself. There’s nothing on the web about him. He’s had ten posts in four months at his site.
The team is “Derek Coons” and “Derek Tech.”
His web site is anonymized and there is no information about the domain at “whois.”
I rather doubt Coons is a microbiologist or virologist qualified to write such a story.
Beside, if you set CT=95, your car tires will test positive for COVID.
This is one of the most worthless posts this year.
LOL
But what does this mean for those who are found Negative by a WHO test kit?
Have we finally created a method that is able to detect those visitors from non-human precincts beyond the Earth?
Finally, we will be able to detect the aliens walking among us. I’m betting most democrats will test negative.
Which specific sequence? Different countries use different target sequences. And they always use 2 different ones. Both must be positive for a positive test.
I can’t count how many times I’ve posted what I thought was a semi-witty quip, only to see my post land right beneath one from another FReeper who had exactly the same idea. OK, this one was pretty obvious, but I’ll just stipulate that we’re both geniuses.
I was tested negative on 12/18/2020. I’m pretty sure I was born in Sacramento.
I have had two negative tests, so we are most certainly not all positive. I know of a few other people that tested negative, including my parents who live in an assisted living facility (Dad is in memory care). They have been exposed to workers and other residents that tested positive and were symptomatic and there have been a few deaths at the facility as well, so they have both been tested several times (Dad and Mom are up to at least 5 now) and have never had a positive result come back.
The PCR test when run beyond 25 cycles is a joke, I’ll agree on that. They need to be culturing samples as well.
Walking Dead, we are all infected!
How can a Bombshell article be 4 months old?
In order to get a false positive or a false negative result om a PCR there has to be a “gold standard” method for comparison. There isnt one because you cannot properly define what a “case” is in the first place.
The man who invented the test says it will find anything that it is assigned to find.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.