SCOTUS REJECTS Texas Lawsuit! Here’s Why THIS IS NOT OVER BY A LONGSHOT!!!

youtube ^ | 12/12/2020 | Dr. Steve Turley

[Signalman]

SCOTUS REJECTS Texas Lawsuit! Here’s Why THIS IS NOT OVER BY A LONGSHOT!!! (Substantive part of video begins at 3:45.)

Giuliani's Team has filed suits in the 4 states (WI, MI, PA and GA)where Trump DOES HAVE STANDING since he was directly affected by the fraud.

Because of these case and additional cases filed by Sean Parnell, the Dominion case and others, Turley believes there is a solid chance that the President of the Senate, Mike Pence, will not certify the electors, who vote on December 14th. As a result, a fully contested election will get thrown to the House of Representatives where the state delegates will elect Trump. There are 30 Republican state delegations and 20 Democrat.

[FreeReign]

Dr. Steve is a sunshine pumper.

I could use a little sunshine right now.

[FreeReign]

Turley is on solid ground. I think this is the case we have been waiting for. The Texas case may have just been a distraction to get to this case.

The Sekulows were saying that the Texas case was "the one".

[jmclemore]

I think his EO is the final and best option. Any remedy at this point means they are coming for conservatives, Christians and Trump supporters - US.

they are coming whether they win or lose....

[Georgia Girl 2]

Sorry folks Mike Pence is a total establishment guy. He would never do anything outside the normal bounds.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Are you just stupid? The Oathkeepers have vowed to never accept this fraud election.

[spacejunkie2001]

Praise God and let it be so!

[scrabblehack]

That requires both Houses, not Pence.

If the legislatures would appoint electors, Trump might catch up with Tilden.

[Balding_Eagle]

The Texas case would have been an empty victory at best.

Winning the right to have the state legislators appoint the Electors would have resulted in a boatload of turncoat Republicans exposed.

Biden would have gotten all the Electors.

[mbj]

+1

LOL

[poconopundit]

Thanks for posting this. Steve Turley is great. A lot of pessimists occupy Free Republic these days.

Turley has the right perspective. It’s not over by a long shot.

[Finalapproach29er]

“When the Earth totters it is I who keep steady its pillars”

[mbj]

OK, “backlash” here -

So if one State breaks its own laws/constitution and manages to injure another State and/or its citizens rights, who has standing and who should the injured party appeal to in terms of law?

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm

[Diana in Wisconsin]

AMEN!

[timestax]

The Supreme Sham.

[timestax]

The Supreme Farce !

[jmclemore]

So if one State breaks its own laws/constitution and manages to injure another State and/or its citizens rights, who has standing and who should the injured party appeal to in terms of law?

Your question has 2 parts

1. So if one State breaks its own laws/constitution, who has standing and who should the injured party appeal to in terms of law?
In this case (election laws) the state legislature is the injured. It is for them to assert their authority and sue the other branches of their state government when the Governor and State Supreme courts oversteps their authority violating the constitutional power of the legislature. In this case, the legislature has a legitimate case, with standing, that it could bring to the SCOTUS. But until they do - It's like a bad marriage where the abused spouse remains silent even though the children(residents) are suffering. Mind you those residents have the life altering decision to vote with their feet or remain and just accept - irrelevancy.

2. So if one State breaks its own laws/constitution and manages to injure another State and/or its citizens rights,
While I certainly agree the violation of state laws (in atleast 4 states) has denied my the national outcome I desired. But what I nor the state of Kansas can claim is that the election fraud of those 4 states interfered with the election process of Kansas and my ability to vote. Because of that, I am completely right to be enraged by their conduct but their conduct had not direct connection to me or my ballot. The Idea that the election outcome being less than what I desired does not grant me "injured status".

The area where I am legitimately injured, in this election, is when there is Domestic, Foreign and Digital (AI) interference in the election's entire network where data transmission lines were used to hack, manipulate (attack) and transmit fraudulent election data to defraud the entire US population.

We have missed a very important opportunity to fix this. Every state has been effected by the voting machines, software, vendors and foreign actors who had access to servers that counted our votes.

Which brings me back to the President's EO
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election

That is way I pray that when Trump, Rudy, Sidney and others claim the entire election was fraudulent and accessed by foreign countries, that they also have the (Bannon Qu0ote:) Receipts.

[faucetman]

Three minutes of listening to this guy’s fake, irritating, sing-songy voice and he still hadn’t even started to get to the point.

Never again for this guy.

[unlearner]

“Pence came down with a severe case of Laryngitis on the morning of November 4th.”

Wrong!

Pence on 12/10/2020: “The fight is on!... I stand with President Donald Trump... fighting every day for integrity in our elections... we’re going to keep fighting to counting until every legal vote is counted, and we’re going to keep fighting until every illegal vote is thrown out, and we will never stop fighting to make Ameirca great again!”

https://youtu.be/l32hijhD0uw

[unlearner]

“Only Congress does and that would require both chambers agreeing to do so. All VP Pence does is preside over the counting of the votes and announces the results.”

That interpretation of the law is not settled. It is agreed that if both the House and Senate decide to count a disputed vote, it is to be counted. Some argue that if either the House or Senate reject the vote, the President of the Senate (Pence) casts the deciding vote.