Posted on 12/01/2020 4:18:39 PM PST by MHGinTN
I wonder, if the election outcome in any state or several combined reaches the Supreme Court, what remedy would best suit that Court?
The Court issues a rejection or a remedy. If the Court chooses to seek a remedy, the following is a suggestion of what remedy would disenfranchise the least voters who are on record as legitimate, not in question via mail-in ballots.
Late in the evening of 11/3 early morning of 11/4 a command from 'someone' came to the powers overseeing the counting in Milwaukee, Detroit, Philly and Pittsburgh, Atlanta, and Maricopa County, Arizona and a few other cities. That command was to stop counting and send away the counting observers watching the counting. That was coordinated, not coincidence.
When lawfully appointed observers / monitors were no longer present to lawfully observe counting, the several cities restarted counting massive numbers of 'mail-in' ballots.
There are several legitimate issues with these massive ballot dumps, beyond the forced exclusion of lawful monitoring. ALL of the ballots counted during the illicit counting are suspect since illicit means were used to hide the counting of these suspect ballots.
As a reasonable remedy, the Supreme Court could point to that moment of coordinated stoppage until lawful observers were prevented from watching subsequent counting, as the point beyond which no ballots can be included in the lawfully received votes at the various precincts. Disqualifying all ballots counted after that stoppage and ejection of any legitimate observers is the remedy the Court can use to legitimize the election results.
The status of ALL candidates for down ballot positions and the top of the ticket presidential position would be remedied with the least amount of actual voters disenfranchised. Such a remedy might make a run off in Georgia unnecessary and might even bring a good man from Michigan into the United States Senate.
I wonder where all the election positions stood when the stop counting command was issued?
“ If the democraps steal this I am out.”
I’m already out.
You can see this train wreck coming from miles away.
And there’s no magic “trap” or wild solution coming.
You just keep believing the lying media ... but stop spewing their lies here, we have better references at FR.
There are sworn affidavits that contradict your media lies. Rudy shared one at the presser done in Gettysburg. Go watch the video of that meeting with PA senators, if you qactually want the truth.
I figured you did, but the thought of San Fran Nancy acting as president is absolutely frightening.
They’re ALL nuts, LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.