Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Video] We Urgently Must Disempower the Supreme Court — Interview with Samuel Moyn [Radical Leftism]
youtube ^ | 29 Sep 2020 | Weekends with Ana and Nandos

Posted on 10/01/2020 4:36:30 PM PDT by blueplum

Video interview of Yale Law Professor of Jurisprudence Samuel Moyn on how the left should think about the Supreme Court and how to disempower it.

Moyn discusses Supreme Court packing and suggests using the threat of packing as a way to coerce SCOTUS rulings. He also posits ways to disempower and control a conservative Supreme Court, such as 'modest packing' and then mandating a SCOTUS supermajority for every ruling. Which Biden could be pushed, and would be expected, to enact under a Biden administration (as part of 'reimagining' government).


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: behindthescenes; communism; leftwing; marxism; mobrule; politics; scotus; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
While we're being distracted by broken windows, the foundations of our government are being plotted against. As comfortable as this professor is discussing the neutering of SCOTUS, I'm sure it's not an original idea.

And now we know.

1 posted on 10/01/2020 4:36:30 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Sammy Boi needs to become familiar with Rule 308...


2 posted on 10/01/2020 4:37:54 PM PDT by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Exactly. IMHO, the Republic really isn't ever going to be safe until Moyne and his ilk take the dirt nap.

If these scum or their predecessors had been imprisoned and hanged for treason during the Vietnam War we wouldn't be in this situation now.

3 posted on 10/01/2020 4:39:59 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

How about pass Constitutional laws?


4 posted on 10/01/2020 4:40:01 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '20. Now, more than ever! (61, I didn't take into account Mittens.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

That’s for sure.

“The day ain’t over yet”.


5 posted on 10/01/2020 4:55:00 PM PDT by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

and then everything else goes with it ,just what they want


6 posted on 10/01/2020 5:02:45 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Samuel Moyn is a moron spouting every fantasy scenario the progs are dreaming up.

Most of that crap will result is total chaos which will open the door for the President to invoke the Insurrection Act.

.


7 posted on 10/01/2020 5:06:07 PM PDT by TLI (ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

I am going to dumb down the Supreme Court nominating process. The party in control is going to nominate someone they feel will support what they believe in. From far left to far right. It’s why being president counts. No doubt Biden would go with an opposite pick. It’s not rocket science.


8 posted on 10/01/2020 5:20:55 PM PDT by leaning conservative (snow coming, school cancelled, yayyyyyyyyy!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Ha! The colonial British used to have rule 303. 308 is progress.


9 posted on 10/01/2020 5:21:14 PM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ( Deplorable, and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

“If these scum or their predecessors had been imprisoned and hanged for treason during the Vietnam War we wouldn’t be in this situation now.”

It’s never too late.


10 posted on 10/01/2020 5:26:07 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care! Guilting you is how they control you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
how the left should think about the Supreme Court and how to disempower it.

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic. For decades the Supreme Court has made rulings to favor the left that they could never get through legislatively. For example, even California residents had voted that marriage should be between one man and one woman, but the court decided that perversion is OK.

11 posted on 10/01/2020 5:29:05 PM PDT by libertylover (Election 2020: Make America Great Again or Burn it to the Ground. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

That pesky Constitution keeps getting in the way.


12 posted on 10/01/2020 5:29:29 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (Religion. It's like a History class. Without the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

It’s easier to pass unconstitutional ones and pack the court and get anything you want.


13 posted on 10/01/2020 5:30:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Where do you find the word "except" in the 2nd Amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Dems are fine with the court, but only if it always rules the way they want it.

Dems are fine with laws, but only if they are the laws they want.

Libs are fine with many things but only when they rubber stamp whatever libs want


14 posted on 10/01/2020 5:42:11 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

And if you want to get to the root of it....

Libs just cannot abide or handle being told NO.

We have to handle it when they win.

But they dont when we win. Look at the results.


15 posted on 10/01/2020 5:43:46 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Progressives have always seen the Supreme Court as a center of government power, as useful in being able to change the rules to the way they want them.

This concept is over 100 years old in the United States.


16 posted on 10/01/2020 5:55:51 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

So let’s see,,

They want to

Get rid of President
Get rid of Electoral College
Get rid of Judiciary

And that leaves what ?

The Central Committee ?
( A politburo )

Will they give us one of those neat
5 year plans ?

Wow, how commie scum of them.


17 posted on 10/01/2020 6:00:11 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran 10/17/78 to 11/24/84)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Stalinists lie. Always

If this law professor cannot abide by the law (and seek to change the game just because his side is now losing), he shouldn’t be training our next generation of lawyers, judges, and politicians.


18 posted on 10/01/2020 6:12:57 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019)l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

If they cant win them

They want to warp them


19 posted on 10/01/2020 6:25:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blueplum; All
As a side note to this thread, please consider the following.

"Video interview of Yale Law Professor of Jurisprudence Samuel Moyn on how the left should think about the Supreme Court and how to disempower it."

Similarly to answering what year the War of 1812 was fought, the answer to how to disempower the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Supreme Court is likewise clear.

Wake up the sleeping, unconstitutional federal funding-begging state legislatures to repeal the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

In fact, once unconstitutional federal taxes are permanently stopped, taxes that corrupt Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, the states will ultimately find a tsunami of new revenues that they can use for all sorts of things.

For starters, the states can improve public schools, including raising teacher’s salaries. The states will also be able to provide more funding for police and fire departments, raising the salaries of police and firefighters too. The states can also repair and expand infrastructure.

Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government desperate Democrats home in November!

Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a "third term" in office imo.

I don’t see any problem with voting Republican ticket for 2020 elections.

Insights welcome.

20 posted on 10/01/2020 6:30:05 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson