|
Posted on 06/12/2020 9:21:43 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and information sources we've identified.
The use of “skateboards” is consistent in these Antifa tactics ... I doubt they’ve ever used for intended purposes lol. The video from person that went to LA riot and watched Antifa stage the burning of an apparent prop police car showed how the Antifa using “skateboards” coordinated with those lighting the car on fire once the windows were breached.
Skateboards....I almost made them respectable
You see I can’t always get through to you
So I go for your son.
-Joe Jackson “I’m the Man”
When watching that great video this one popped up and - anyone not 100% convinced we must defund and exit the WHO will be after 10 seconds of watching this:
https://twitter.com/BradTwitler/status/1271453282452467717
WW G1WGA
May justice be served and Flynn be free now!
https://mobile.twitter.com/McAdooGordon/status/1271498745683771397
Leslie McAdoo Gordon
@McAdooGordon
That is clear from numerous things that Judges Henderson & Rao said, & I think even Wilkins, who was the most antagonistic to the DOJ/Flynn position generally. Debating the scope of Sullivan’s right to review isn’t going to change the ultimate answer for any of them.
The other thing that made this clear is how Sullivan’s counsel, Beth Wilkinson, backpedalled vigorously in the argument from what’s in her brief. To hear her at the argument, you would think Sullivan just has a couple of questions. Face with rolling eyes That is not what her brief says!
The DOJ lawyer hammered that at the end, giving the judges the specific pages in Wilkinson’s brief where she laid out a broad scope of inquiry. Wilkinson all but disavowed that in her argument because the judges all generally agreed Sullivan can’t “2nd guess” DOJ.
So, the question for the court is: if the court isn’t a “rubber stamp” to DOJ in this situation, but also “can’t 2nd guess” DOJ either, then what in the world is the standard? Shockingly, I predict they won’t answer that question! Upside-down face
What they should do is grant the mandamus & tell Judge Sullivan to grant leave to dismiss. DOJ is right that any inquiry by Sullivan into DOJ’s decision making violates the separation of powers. Based on today’s argument, I think the chances of that are close to zero, however.
What I think they will probably do is deny the mandamus, but write an opinion that says they of course expect Sullivan to follow Fokker, which they will save gives him a right to review the DOJ’s motion, but they won’t say how or to what extent his inquiry can go.
That decision lets Sullivan hold the hearing on July 16th & make a ruling on the motion. If he grants the motion for leave to dismiss, that’s the end of the case. If he denies it, Flynn will file another mandamus petition & the chances that one gets granted are close to 100% imo.
The upshot is that what the Court of Appeals has done by requiring Sullivan to respond to the mandamus petition & holding this argument today is to *informally*, rather than formally as DOJ requested, lay down some ground rules.
These informal rules are: 1. DOJ can (and probably will now) refuse to accede to any request or demand from Judge Sullivan that it thinks violates the separation of powers. This is stunning because in general, the Gov doesn’t want to directly flout a judge. It won’t be shy now.
2. Sullivan should ignore the craziness that Gleeson gave him as “advice” in his amicus brief. He also should limit his review of DOJ’s motion to avoid invoking a separation of powers problem. (Since they aren’t saying where that line is, good luck everyone figuring that out.)
3. Flynn has to suffer the expense/stress of the case continuing because that’s just how the cookie crumbles. (The Courts of Appeals really do not care about this issue. Ever.) But, if Sullivan doesn’t do right & give leave to dismiss, he can file for mandamus again & succeed.
From the Court of Appeals point of view: problem solved. Flynn will get his dismissal; DOJ can stiff-arm the judge; Sullivan saves face if he takes the hint & conducts a sober hearing & doesn’t rule the “wrong” way ultimately; the Court doesn’t have to rule now, but can later.
The “only” problem with this outcome is that: (1) it undermines their precedent in Fokker, (2) it’s unfair to the defendant & DOJ, & (3) it leaves open the possibility that Sullivan doesn’t take the hint & they have to fix a bigger mess later than the one they have now.
Is that really Tedros in the bar, or did someone fake that?
mark
You’re going to throw away something that you will need next week. Always happens.
In unner a hunnert!
Mother Nature wants to heeeeal those wounds you’ve put in her with your mowers.
On this thread where our defining attitude is,
That sort of rudeness is uncalled-for -- and is offensive to those of us who appreciate the efforts of our colleagues.
TXnMA
The poster was referring to the picture at the top of the former Q thread. By the say, the TRUMP TRAIN is an excellent Free Republic thread, and has excellent analysis on Q and other topics. They are not TROLLS. I'm tempted to click the abuse button on your comment.
In around a hunnert!
Did you see further down the thread the CTA (Chicago Transit Authority ) guy body slam?
People are getting to their endpoint with this stuff. And now knowing in many of these cities nobody is coming to save your butt...
https://twitter.com/SirWilliamScot5/status/1270599081140895750
People are noticing no legs, no arm?
Gotcha, nothing against “real” skateboarders, loved my board back in the (long distant) day.
The Highlander reporting in!
(Under 100)
In, read the first 100, and out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
