Posted on 04/10/2020 9:24:26 AM PDT by Steve1999
Attorney General William Barr has revealed that U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation, into the origins of claims of Russian collusion against President Donald Trump, has uncovered evidence "far more troubling" than what could be explained away as "mistakes or sloppiness."AG Barr shed new light on Durham’s review of the Russia investigation during an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Thursday night.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
Just keep talking Bill. You can easily run out the statute-of-limitations clock if you stay focused.
“Barr suggested the opposite. He side Durham could have a report but that it isn’t Durham’s job to make reports.”
I cited the OP’s article:
Barr suggested there would also likely end up being a Durham report.
“Well, I think a report maybe — and probably — will be a byproduct of his activity,” Barr told Ingraham.
Just a point, statute of limits clock stops when the investigation begins. We should be at least glad to hear what little Barr is making public. He doesnt strike me as one who says things without purpose. Otherwise, I share your frustrations about how this has been dragged out, so no flames please.
A really really bad DAY TIME stripper.
The manure will hit the fan AFTER the General Election, not before.
"His primary focus isn't to prepare a report. He is looking to bring to justice people who have committed abuses if he can find evidence..."
Thanks, my post supported my assertion.
Investigate until the statute of limitations is up and then just shrug?
It’s time to start asking: Is John Durham more a part of the problem vs the solution? All this legalistic ‘footdragging’ would have worn out 10 pairs of new boots by now.
Prove me wrong, Mr. Durham, I wish that you would.
They might not be doing much, but on the other hand it takes time to build a case which both A) doesn’t cheat, and B) takes down multiple levels of a conspiracy. Mueller’s team cheated. Regularly.
Any names we’d recognize?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.