Posted on 11/11/2019 9:27:04 PM PST by Morgana
During day 16 of the Planned Parenthood v The Center for Medical Progress (CMP) civil trial on Tuesday, “damning admissions” were heard from the witness stand from both the procurement manager and founder of Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR), a procurement company that has received aborted babies from Planned Parenthood.
After the attorneys for Planned Parenthood rested their case, the defense called ABR procurement manager Perrin Larton to the stand. Larton testified that she stands by all of the statements she made to CMP founder David Daleiden regarding aborted babies who “just fell out” intact and then used for organ harvesting. She told him that ABR would receive these intact aborted children every couple of months.
“I told him that sometimes a fetus would be in the vagina and come out intact,” she testified, saying she didn’t recant any of the statements she made while she was recorded for the video below without her knowledge:
The defense then called ABR president Linda Tracy, who testified that the company harvests fetal organs and tissue from Planned Parenthood Pacific Southwest. Planned Parenthood attorneys objected to Tracy naming any other Planned Parenthood affiliates.
According to CMP, “Tracy contradicted herself multiple times on the witness stand when asked questions that could impact Planned Parenthood’s case.” Pro-Life San Francisco founder and executive director Terrisa Bukovinac told Live Action News that Tracy refused to admit that she spoke about fetal tissue pricing with abortion providers during National Abortion Federation (NAF) conferences. But then the defense played her videotaped deposition during which she testified to the opposite. During that taped deposition, she said that her conversations at NAF conferences include pricing fetal body parts, adding that she talked about ABR’s “Regulated Tissue Acquisition,” for which researchers would pay $6,000 per procurement. She also said on the stand that conversations at NAF were confidential, when she stated in the taped deposition that they were not.
The defense also called statistician Michael New, Ph.D. to the stand. He testified to the “low quality” and unreliability of NAF’s statistics on harassment of abortion providers and violence against them. Bukovinac said that New testified to there being no consistent methodology to NAF’s report on violence against abortionists and that their numbers were not corroborated. He stated that a quality report would have cited police reports (which it did not), adding that the absence of such made NAF’s report nothing more than “just numbers on a page.”
“[The National Abortion Federation] has an interest in overstating or inflating their statistics,” New explained, saying that only 60 percent of NAF members even reported data on harassment and violence.
“It’s impossible to establish any useful information in respect to levels of incidents or trends” without all of the facilities reporting, he said. “They [NAF] do try to make the case that violence and harassment are increasing. […] They advertise their data as comprehensive. 60 percent doesn’t strike me as comprehensive.”
A portion of the video deposition for Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast surgical center director Tram Nguyen that hadn’t previously been shown to the jury was played. Nguyen said she never saw a proposed contract emailed by Daleiden that set the fee for fetal livers at $700 and fetal liver and thymus from the same aborted child at $1700. She said she didn’t “recall” that contract — yet, she forwarded the email to another director at Planned Parenthood Diane Santos who asked Nguyen if she wanted “to move forward” with the contract. Nguyen replied, “Yes, ma’am.”
Earlier in the day, Kevin Paul of Planned Parenthood Rocky Mountains returned to the stand. He stated that his role at Planned Parenthood was to provide legal counsel on business matters. According to Bukovinac, he testified that it was a fair statement to say that if Planned Parenthood had done a simple Google search on BioMax in order to vet the company, they wouldn’t have allowed them into conferences and meetings.
Paul went on to testify about Ginde’s public comments regarding the undercover videos she made in a TED talk about the CMP investigation, as well as the book she wrote about it. If Ginde was actually frightened for her safety because of the CMP investigation, why would she then talk about that investigation in a recorded public talk and then write a book about it?
Court resumed Wednesday, November 6 at 8 a.m. in San Francisco.
Ghouls.
Then what the hell was put in the washing machine!!!????
... regarding aborted babies who “just fell out” intact and then used for organ harvesting...
What, what do you say to this!!?!
I’ve seen some dark and disturbing things in my life.
I suppose everyone has.
NONE of those things holds a candle to this.
I’m not embarrassed to say that at 51 this will give me nightmares.
MY GRANDNEPHEW WAS JUST BORN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If someone stuck a PIN in his arm I would RIP THEIR ARM OUT.
Well that takes a gorilla’s strength.
I would incapacitate them and then saw it off.
THESE GUYS ARE KILLING BABIES THAT ARE FINE AND RIPPING OUT THEIR ORGANS!!!!
Would removing THEIR organs while still alive by so wrong?
Without anesthesia.
Morgana, you’re gonna have to start putting WARNING signs next to some of these threads.
I’m partially joking. We NEED to know. But the horror takes a toll on anyone with a SOUL!!
‘Babies just fall out’—after induced labor.
Brother, are you not comfortable with the trade?
The reason these ghouls want late-term abortion, up until the baby is born and then killed, is because it’s easier to harvest larger organs.
The new mantra from the left is that you can kill the baby after it is born. Call it a post-natal abortion.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ask yourselves, why does the left want this so bad? Why do they cultivate babies and then abort them?
Why does the left insist on this one thing and make it a cornerstone of their beliefs?
Why do they demand child sacrifice?
Why don’t republicans do anything against this?
The republicans and democrats are compromised. They both must endorse child sacrifice.
It. Is. Satanic.
If the child was alive outside the mother and killed, that is murder. Life sentences for all who let it happen.
Everyone involved should be lined up and shot in the back of the head.
I’m partial to THEIR organs being removed while they are AWAKE, no anesthesia.
But that’s just me.
The devil can take up residence in a human body but that body can still die just like any other human’s.
I know, as Christians we are supposed to show mercy.
So kill them quickly and forget the torture.
“Everyone involved should be lined up and shot in the back of the head”
NO!
Everyone involved should be lined up and shot in the FACE!
So they can see the look on my face as I pull the trigger.
I can’t understand the MONETARY value of these murdered baby parts. If it’s for research, who’s funding it???
We need to destroy the material motivation for this evil.
I was gonna say front.
I’m sick
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.