Her ratings are richly deserved.
Poor old See BS...............First it was Connie Chung, then Katie Couric, now this loser........................
Its not merely because she’s anti-Trump. The entire corporate, mainstream, oligopolist mainstream media is anti-Trump.
Its because broadcast TV is a dying media. Its ownership and its ideology is become more and more concentrated, and that’s because it simply can’t compete with everything the internet has to offer for news.
I laugh at her ad’s when I watch CBS. They tell me that CBS is “News you can trust” I fall out of my chair laughing thinking about trust is not a state that I associate with CBS of the 7 million dollar woman. When someone is a liar and so anti Trump, go have coffee with Kelly and fight over who will pay fro it.
Does anyone actually believe that over 5,000,000 people actually watch the CBS evening news or for that matter any of the network newscasts. Would really like to see just how Nielsen does those “ratings”, how they are formulated and just who pays for them.
An angry lib anti-Trumper isn’t getting ratings? Really?
Just look at her, she oozes anger.
It’s one of the MSM alphabet slimeworks.
No one believes anyone on the screen.
Period.
Anyone getting their news from TV is dumber than a “studies” professor.
Does anyone still turn on their TVs to learn new "news"? I watch next to no TV news and honestly I think I'm more informed than 99.9% of the sheeple. Except for breaking events, and sports, my TV is dark most of the day.
Well, since I am usually up before 5:00AM and at work before these shows start, I’ve not made morning news shows a viewing habit in many years. Did like Joan Lunden on GMA and Kathleen Sullivan on This Morning back in the day though, lol.
Too bad Doctor Raoul isn’t around to see this. She was one of his favourite targets. I’m sure he’s laughing from above.
Tom Tucker: “You hear that? You hear that tone you’re using? That’s penis repellent right there.”
Why did they pay somebody millions of dollars to do this? I mean they could probably pick a name out of a hat , pay them minimum wage to read the news, and get better ratings.
See-BS. News you can trust.
Even that’s a damnable lie.
You certainly have a way with words; you silver-tongued rascal. That was my thought precisely; only, probably not as succinct.
Obvious case of misogyny—just like the election of 2016.
I cannot remember the last time I watched an evening newscast. Must be decades now. I only watch local news for traffic and weather.
Paraphrasing Bernie Sanders, she does not earn her fair share.
Who between the ages of 25 and 54 is watching a network news broadcast?
Unless you are captive in an airport terminal or something, I can’t name 5 people I know in that age group that watch any network news.
Make sure to read the bottom third of the article . . talk about rationalizations!
And of course they had to make it a women’s issue at the end!
Meanwhile, in REAL NEWS, the latest Harris Poll of Trump’s Approval Rating, shows that 35% of AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN APPROVED of the Trump performance. And in the Louisiana Governor’s race last week 25% of AA voters voted for a Republican.
Reporting THAT NEWS would create buzz but they’re just too stupid to go there.
In steps Shepard Smith when is no-compete clause ends.