Posted on 10/01/2019 8:55:22 AM PDT by CaptainK
Amber Guyer guilty of murder, Just announced on FOX News
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I am surprised.
Her son was murdered for no good reason. She can react anyway she wants to in my opinion.
An often repeated situation. Being too small to be a police officer.
For this to stink, it would require a motive on her part. Tell me, what was the motive for her to murder this guy? What motive did the court/jury find?
I have sat on a jury before. Defense has a say to the jurors as well.
This is easily remedied.
Any hiring manager who recklessly disregards a failed psych eval should be held PERSONALLY liable for any damage the psychotic or sociopathic cop does. The taxpayers don't pay, the person who hired them pays full restitution out of their own pocket.
Hiring a person who "has really strong sadistic tendencies and fantasies of rape and murder", giving them a badge and gun and authority over any woman driving a car is no less dangerous that throwing an enraged rattlesnake into a kindergarten.
As did I.
That would be your opinion.
Because Ice Cream is an Immediate Mortal Danger.TM
I can see, smell and hear.
I’m never going to walk into the wrong house.
She is a murderer and the very representative Dallas jury did the right thing.
That itself would seem to mitigate against any claim about the "involuntary" nature of what she had done.
If I may ask three things, sir.
1) Even if it was 100% a mistake, does that take away the fact that she still KILLED a human being who had done nothing wrong? To the victim’s family - and he was a victim - it doesn’t matter if she killed him by mistake, or it was first degree murder, or it was an affair turned rancid, or she thought he was a werewolf. Bottom line - he died. The pain to them is the same - it may even be worse considering it was a ‘mistake.’ If he was a criminal who died in a hail of bullets robbing a bank it may be more palatable than what happened there.
2) Would you be as understanding of someone taking an innocent life by mistake if that innocent life was one of your family members?
3) I am assuming you’re not a law enforcement officer, and with that assumption let’s say you - as a non LEO - walked into someone’s home and shot them by mistake. How do you think your case would be handled? Do you think you’d get the benefit of a doubt?
Anyway, bottom line someone died who shouldn’t have. As the other postwr said, there are MANY people I’d feel sad for before I feel sorry for that cop.
Just to play devil’s advocate, if you don’t believe her story that she thought she was in her own apartment, you’ve got to be prepared to believe that she deliberately went into the apartment with the purpose of committing murder. Now, that might be, but I don’t think it was ever brought into evidence, probably because there was no evidence for it.
If so, they wouldn't be the only ones.
I seriously believe that she will win on appeal; but we shall see.
For sure she had no business being a police office and there is no telling what else she may have done as you said.
Pardon my French, but in light of his testimony I'd say this jury verdict is a giant "F#%& You!" to the Texas Rangers -- and rightly so.
Tell me, what was the motive for her to murder this guy? What motive did the court/jury find?
From the videos of the police officer at the crime scene and her testimony. She was too fragile and small to be a police officer. She used the only equalizer at her disposal to quell a supposed threat from an unarmed larger man. She did not try to help the dying victim. She paced outside the apartment in the hallway crying talking on her phone to her boyfriend. Mean while the innocent victim lay dying in his home by himself in the dark. In a real stressful situation which she created she acted selfishly. A real problem in many young women today, I’m afraid.
Cops cover for cops.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.