|
Posted on 09/25/2019 11:24:02 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Michael Brown. I think that is an unfair characterization of him. He currently hosts a radio program in Denver and he is hard right and definitely white hat. He has nothing good to say about Bush.
I just sent and email to devine asking about those 2 reports.
Now I’m done for now...
Thanks for taking a look and your comments.
I guess Tom Fitton needs to put on his cape and do his thing.
“Isn’t he the one that used to work at BreitBart?”
no, but..... if you read his wikipedia page, it’s not all up to par with how most of us here think, so, maybe we should put him, again, in the “sort of trust” category? like gray hat? he worked at the washington times as editor in chief. this from wikipedia...
” Under Solomon, the Times changed some of its style guide to conform to more mainstream media usage. The Times announced that it would no longer use words like “illegal aliens” and “homosexual,” and instead opt for “more neutral terminology” such as “illegal immigrants” and “gay,” respectively. The paper also decided to stop using “Hillary” when referring to Senator Hillary Clinton, and to stop putting the word “marriage” in the expression “gay marriage” in quotes.”
did he see the light? did he come on strong after the forbidden city was shut down?
i’m not sure if you are thinking about ben shapiro? he’s kind of a whiner lol. he left breitbart after defending michelle fields over corey lewandowski was accused of manhandling her. i so wish he had reserved judgement regarding that.
petey
Excellent maybe you’ll get a response.
You are welcome.
“Isn’t he the one that used to work at BreitBart?”
no, but..... if you read his wikipedia page, it’s not all up to par with how most of us here think, so, maybe we should put him, again, in the “sort of trust” category? like gray hat? he worked at the washington times as editor in chief. this from wikipedia...
” Under Solomon, the Times changed some of its style guide to conform to more mainstream media usage. The Times announced that it would no longer use words like “illegal aliens” and “homosexual,” and instead opt for “more neutral terminology” such as “illegal immigrants” and “gay,” respectively. The paper also decided to stop using “Hillary” when referring to Senator Hillary Clinton, and to stop putting the word “marriage” in the expression “gay marriage” in quotes.”
did he see the light? did he come on strong after the forbidden city was shut down?
i’m not sure if you are thinking about ben shapiro? he’s kind of a whiner lol. he left breitbart after defending michelle fields over corey lewandowski was accused of manhandling her. i so wish he had reserved judgement regarding that.
petey
*******************************************************************************
No - not Solomon or Shapiro—Stranaham or something. I’ll have to sleep on it—maybe I’ll remember who it was in a few days. LOL
The old form was uploaded to scribe by k paoulsen -> daily beast reporter.
https://twitter.com/kpoulsen/status/1177734528833445888
I have no idea from where he got it.
If it’s accurate,(from the Larry O’Donnell school of reporting) then....What ? I don’t know. Are the changes innocent ? on the surface it seems that way.
Beebe makes a strong case for shennanigans.
******************************************************I vote for dirty tricks/shenanigans!
My question would be...Who commissioned or asked for these research documents and why ? I suppose I could ask him directly(I will) but I’m guessing it’s going to take an FOIA request.
just shoot me.
*****************************************LOL. Nah-no shooting— we need inquiring minds.
oops sorry! i should have read the post to which you were replying.
petey
“No - not Solomon or Shapiro—Stranaham or something. I’ll have to sleep on it—maybe I’ll remember who it was in a few days. LOL”
you are correct, greeneyes. it was stranahan. i’m not quite sure what andrew breitbart saw in him, but he converted stranahan to conservatism brought him on to breitbart. stranahan has quite a colorful history.
petey
Yesterday, the ICIG clarified that the old form is wrong regarding the law.
*****************************************************************************
Color me skeptical. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
