Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a; greeneyes; little jeremiah
Yesterday, the ICIG clarified that the old form is wrong regarding the law.

Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community’s Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints

they cite: 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(A)
3033(k)(5)(B)
3033(k)(5)(G)(i)


If the IG's law citations are correct, the part of the form with ""Background Information on ICWPA Process"(instructions & explanations),that has the first hand knowledge explanation, is wrong.
Which can beg the question, why even have that checkoff in the first place.

I'll go check the citations but I'm guessing this avenue is dead.

Just a note: Even though it is claimed the WB checked off the first hand knowledge box,
There is nothing in the unclassified whistle blower complaint where he\she claims first hand knowledge.
1,772 posted on 10/01/2019 12:11:39 AM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1759 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

Yesterday, the ICIG clarified that the old form is wrong regarding the law.
*****************************************************************************
Color me skeptical. LOL


1,773 posted on 10/01/2019 12:14:19 AM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1772 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson