Posted on 03/12/2019 6:34:53 AM PDT by vannrox
Image: Joe Barnard / BPS Space
To call Joe Barnard an amateur rocketeer is something of a misnomer.
As the founder of Barnard Propulsion Systems (BPS), a small business making flight hardware for other amateur rocketeers, the 25-year-old Nashville resident is working on cracking propulsive landings for model rockets. This is the same principle that allows SpaceX to land the first stage of its Falcon 9 rockets after boosting a payload to orbit, but it has never been demonstrated in hobby rocketry before.
The key to propulsive landings is thrust vectoring, which enables control over the direction of a rockets engines during flight to change its trajectory and stabilize the vehicle. Barnard is a pioneer in DIY thrust vectoring, and in the last few months hes harnessed the technique to test self-landing model-scale rockets. As some of the most recent videos on his YouTube channel demonstrate, there are still a few kinks left to work out, but its pretty impressive what hes managed to accomplish so far.
Although thrust vectoring has been used in the aerospace industry for nearly a century, it was a technology generally considered to be too complex and expensive for amateur use. Barnard wants to change that.
There have been maybe five independent projects in the last ten years trying to incorporate thrust vectoring in their rockets, Barnard told me on the phone. Generally speaking it doesnt go so well or it never gets to the point of flying. No one else has carried it through to the point where Im at right now.
Over the last three years, Barnard has managed to turn his rocketry hobby into a full-time gig. Watching videos of his rockets, which include scale replicas of SpaceXs Falcon 9 and Rocket Labs Electron, its hard to believe he doesnt come from a technical background.
A test flight of Barnard's SpaceX Falcon Heavy Replica. Image: Joe Barnard/BPS Space
Although Barnards father worked on rocket propulsion back in the 90s, Barnard attended Berklee College of Music and worked as a videographer after graduating. He said he became interested in the aerospace industry after watching videos of early SpaceX flights. His initial goal with starting BPS was to attract the attention of aerospace companies and eventually transition into the industry.
Read More: Inside BALLS, the Most Exclusive Amateur Rocketry Event in the World
Aerospace is a really exciting industry and I decided thats where I wanted to work, but I didnt feel like I could afford to go back to school, Barnard said. I also learn better through teaching myself things so I bought a bunch of textbooks and got to work.
When he first started out, Barnard was truly working from scratch. He had to teach himself not only the basics of rocketry, a complex mix of physics and chemistry, but also how to assemble hardware and write the software programs to control it. Barnard said the most difficult part was learning how to write the flight control software, which required him to learn programming languages like C++ and Swift.
The hardest part is getting a flight computer to understand how to point itself in the right direction without wobbling around a bunch, Barnard said. This is a control problem that usually only super advanced aerospace engineers are doing to fly things to space. They have tons of computing power and resources, whereas Im trying to make this happen basically using a glorified Arduino.
Barnards early flight computers were prototyped using off-the-shelf components and Arduino microcontrollers, but these days his flight computers consist of customized printed circuit boards with parts that are optimized for their task. Earlier this year, he launched his second iteration of the BPS avionics system, Signal, which he sells in thrust vectoring kits for $350 each. The combined income from selling these hardware kits and the BPS Patreon allowed Barnard to quit doing videography work and begin working on BPS full-time last spring.
Perusing Barnards YouTube channel speaks volumes about how fast his homebrew thrust vectoring technology has progressed. Videos of his first rockets from 2015 are a compendium of failure, featuring more rockets sliding along the ground than flying through the air. Still, these early failures were invaluable learning experiences for Barnard and speak to the difficulty of the problem he is trying to solve.
Testing roll control for a Falcon Heavy replica. Image: Joe Barnard/BPS Space
We didnt have a single flight you could classify as successful for the first year and a few months, Barnard told me. I was dumping thousands of dollars into this and nothing was working, but I really wanted to work in aerospace and I had to demonstrate I knew what I was doing. It didnt bother me that a lot of the early things failed pretty badly because it shows the progression.
The thrust vectoring system now sold as a kit through BPS is limited to low and medium-powered amateur rockets. Most of Barnards test flights only fly a few hundred feet vertically because the thrust vectoring system can only handle about 40 Newtons of thrust. (For the sake of comparison, the latest version of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket produces about 7.6 million Newtons of thrust at liftoff.) Still, it lays the foundations for using rockets with more powerful motors in the future.
BPS stands for Barnard Propulsion Systems but the funny part is I build every part of the rocket except for the propulsion system, Barnard told me. For his test rockets, Barnard currently uses readymade solid fuel rocket propellant, but hopes to transition to something with more power in the future. Im a horrible chemist, but if we could get enough funding Id like to start working on rockets using liquid or hybrid engines at a sounding rocket scale. That requires a lot more capital though, so for now its just hobby motors.
As for whether Barnards model-scale rocketry efforts have attracted the attention from the aerospace industry that he desires, he told me that several companies have reached out to him, but said he wasnt able to disclose their names or the content of their conversations.
Now that hes starting building a model rocket company of his own, Barnard says he wants to see it through to the finish.
If I just cant get this stuff to work in a few years, then Id be totally happy calling it quits and going to work in the aerospace industry, Barnard told me. But for now I really like having this entrepreneurial endeavor and everything is trending toward it working out.
This is what folks with intelligence do.
When one has no talent and no intelligence, ones goes to college, gets a degree in underwater lesbian plant sex, becomes a community organizer, then is elected as a Democrat representative in some sh*thole city.
We’ve come a long way from the Estes rockets of the 1960’s...!
I built a Big Bertha!..........................
Then one day the county board of A-Holes decided that 90% of the hobby area would be better used as another golf course and that was the end of all but, I believe the Archery Range. Now it is illegal for kids to enjoy model rocketry almost everywhere and that sucks for young imaginations.
Impressive.
They say that the Apollo engineers took us to the moon with computers as powerful as a digital calculator. And slide rules.
This guy is operating on a shoestring, but in some respects he has a lot more than NASA did in the 60s.
Ping.
Some of my childhood Estes rockets were somewhat home-built, on one the coat-hanger launch rod had a little hook on the end I hadn’t noticed. The straw glued to the rocket caught it and somehow achieved an amazing balance. The rocket rose slowly dragging the launch rod to about 15 feet, then settled to the ground in a slow landing. Then the chute popped out!
Remember the Cineroc? Pretty much the genesis of the GoPro concept.
Too cool... “But you can’t do that!” Who says so?
Love it when someone beats common suppression of an idea by society.
“Just watch me!” lol
He's also attempting something that was beyond NASA's capabilities in the '60s. SpaceX does it large scale; he's trying to do it small scale. I'm impressed.
Your description sounds exactly like my experiences with my cousin. They lived “way out in the country” (actually 20 miles out of Philly which is now just suburbia) that was nothing like my concrete, asphalt and row homes existence. They moved to an old, in need of much repair, single family home with a HUGE yard (probably 20 x 30) and an open field beyond the yard...since we had to take multiple busses and the Reading RR to get there it was way out in the country to me and another whole world.
My cousin’s first rocket was home-crafted and propelled by match heads. The next one was an Estes. Once I saw that Estes, I was hooked. I was able to scrape together every penny, nickel and dime I could find to buy a kit and the “engine”, eventually launching my own along with his. Since we only went there twice a year, the wait between launch times was almost unbearable.
Great memories.
Yeah, and before R/C stuff, there were the control-line planes. My home town had a large park, part of which was walled off by tall hedges. Inside the hedge enclosure was a circular concrete runway and in the center of that circle, a concrete pad for the pilot to stand on. I can remember going there with my dad, flying those 1/2-A planes.
Since then, all the attention shifted to R/C, which moved further out to the edges of the city (liability insurance, etc.) I thought the old flying field in the park was surely long gone, but recently found out it's still in use nearly every weekend. I guess there are still some kids out there who want to do more than steer a quad-rotor drone with their smartphone.
I used to do the exact same thing when i was 14..well not quite.
Estes “Big Bertha” was the pinnacle of my success.
3 stages, C-size i believe...
as far as i know the top stage is still in orbit..
See my post 16....still in orbit since 1986!
After a while we gave up on the actual rockets and glued the fins directly on the rocket engines....made for sweet little missiles.
Mine disappeared over Denver in 1974.........................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.