Q Anon: 02/18/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 02/18/19 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Table	tang-soo et. al.	Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube	Storm Is Upon Us	Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube	Dan Duval	Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread	Qmap.pub	QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
The Oracle	Bagster	The Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	Whitehouse	Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website	State Dept.	foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table	FReeQs	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
	“Power to the People”
Twitter	Sara Carter	Fox News National Security/War Correspondent sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	John Solomon	Award winning investigative journalist sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	Praying Medic	Q-drop reactions. Also, YouTube, Vimeo, Podbean.com and ITunes
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Website	Saul Montes-Bradley	Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
YouTube	X22 Report	Investigative Q-drop reactions
YouTube	In Pursuit of Truth	Brisk, lively drop analysis. Also on Gab.Ai
Twitter	Lisa Mei Crowley	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
Thread	Jim Robinson	Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
	“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images

[gnarledmaw]

see 1843, 1844, 1848

[grey_whiskers]

Thanks. (I like the Christian overtones and the “worldwide” theme to go along with Q.)

[haffast]

NEW Q 2856

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: e68885 No.5318964
Feb 22 2019 00:20:27 (EST)
[Soft Push of New Narrative - Example]
https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1098748506364203008
https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1098725171022700545
https://twitter.com/robreiner/status/1098395056052948992
What happened to the Mueller hype?
What happened to the Mueller will take down POTUS threats [@JohnBrennan]?
Was MUELLER the ‘insurance’ policy aka BLOCKADE designed to limit/restrict POTUS’ ability to enforce the law?
[TRAITORS]
New talking points being pushed backing away from Mueller as the savior re: excuse A, excuse B, excuse C?
Why are *new* investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he’s stated for almost (2) years, ‘evidence’ exists that ties POTUS to Russia?
If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked?
If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released?
First they pushed for a SC.
Now they claim the SC didn’t look deep enough?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..?
IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT?
Are *new* investigations designed to be an ‘insurance’ extension?
Designed to prevent POTUS from CLEANING HOUSE?
Attack on political opponent(s) who is/are actively conducting (leading) investigations into the President for XYZ charges beyond Mueller for XYZ reasons (zero evidence to support) - OBSTRUCTION TRAP?
[SDNY] opening ‘private’ investigation for the sole purpose of FINDING A CRIME?
Evidence to support?
Evidence presented?
Does [SDNY] report to AG BARR?
Watch the news.
[MW] opening *new* investigations into the ‘finances’ of POTUS and/or his family?
Why did D’s state ‘things will calm down if we retake the House’ prior to the midterm elections?
Was their plan to retake the House in order to ‘chair’ each respective committee in order to start *new* erroneous investigations in an attempt to retain the BLOCKADE?
Retain the ‘insurance’ policy?
Retain the optical illusion that a crime was committed?
Retain the narrative?
Retain D_base outrage?
Retain D_base obstruction?
Retain D_base support to block POTUS’ agenda?
If you know your opponents move, what advantages that does present?
If you have the TRUTH on your side, what advantages does that present?
If you have full control of the US MIL, what advantages does that present?
If you have complete AUTH TO DECLAS, what advantages does that present?
If you have the SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (PATRIOTS), what advantages does that present?
DO NOT TRUST THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA.
YOU ARE THE MAJORITY.
MUELLER > DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE
THE GREAT AWAKENING.
YOU ARE THE NEWS NOW.
Q

[Melian]

I like the choosing sides theme.

[Bigg Red]

mark

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Good night!

[haffast]

Rest easy patriot! Nite

[Melian]

Retain the optical illusion that a crime was committed?
Retain the narrative?
Retain D_base outrage?
Retain D_base obstruction?
Retain D_base support to block POTUS’ agenda?
........
I don’t see how Q can change their plan. Dems will just keep on obstructing. Their base is tone deaf to the truth.

[CJ Wolf]

New Q. ↑ 🛈 Feb 22 2019 2856 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: e68885 No.5318964 📁 Feb 22 2019 00:20:27 (EST) [Soft Push of New Narrative - Example] https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1098748506364203008📁 https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1098725171022700545📁 https://twitter.com/robreiner/status/1098395056052948992📁 What happened to the Mueller hype? What happened to the Mueller will take down POTUS threats [@JohnBrennan]? Was MUELLER the 'insurance' policy aka BLOCKADE designed to limit/restrict POTUS' ability to enforce the law? [TRAITORS] New talking points being pushed backing away from Mueller as the savior re: excuse A, excuse B, excuse C? Why are *new* investigations by [AS] being started, if, as he's stated for almost (2) years, 'evidence' exists that ties POTUS to Russia? If they had evidence, do you think it would have leaked? If they had evidence, would they be backing away (playing down) the Mueller report about to be released? First they pushed for a SC. Now they claim the SC didn't look deep enough? IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW WHERE, WHO, WHEN, WHY, AND HOW DEEP EACH CASE …………..? IF THE SC REPORT IS CLASSIFIED - HOW DO THEY KNOW THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE REPORT? Are *new* investigations designed to be an 'insurance' extension? Designed to prevent POTUS from CLEANING HOUSE? Attack on political opponent(s) who is/are actively conducting (leading) investigations into the President for XYZ charges beyond Mueller for XYZ reasons (zero evidence to support) - OBSTRUCTION TRAP? [SDNY] opening 'private' investigation for the sole purpose of FINDING A CRIME? Evidence to support? Evidence presented? Does [SDNY] report to AG BARR? Watch the news. [MW] opening *new* investigations into the 'finances' of POTUS and/or his family? Why did D's state 'things will calm down if we retake the House' prior to the midterm elections? Was their plan to retake the House in order to 'chair' each respective committee in order to start *new* erroneous investigations in an attempt to retain the BLOCKADE? Retain the 'insurance' policy? Retain the optical illusion that a crime was committed? Retain the narrative? Retain D_base outrage? Retain D_base obstruction? Retain D_base support to block POTUS' agenda? If you know your opponents move, what advantages that does present? If you have the TRUTH on your side, what advantages does that present? If you have full control of the US MIL, what advantages does that present? If you have complete AUTH TO DECLAS, what advantages does that present? If you have the SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE (PATRIOTS), what advantages does that present? DO NOT TRUST THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA. YOU ARE THE MAJORITY. MUELLER > DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE THE GREAT AWAKENING. YOU ARE THE NEWS NOW. Q

[Steven W.]

That post was satisfied when “hot wheels”, the 8ch board owner, got a “Q” ;)

[CJ Wolf]

Your format much better.

[Steven W.]

Loving these posts and PHASE III

[haffast]

2857

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 60d97a No.5319191
Feb 22 2019 00:34:42 (EST)
We thank you for your service, BO.
We thank you for your service, Vols.
We thank you for your service, Bakers.
We thank you for your service, Anons.
God bless each and every one of you.
Patriots, one and all!
Pepe is proud and has never been more popular.
Q

[bitt]

“Uhhh. Make that an hour and a half. Yea. Hour and a half.”

hahahaha!!!!

[rebelskid]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YlVDGmjz7eM

Economics class

[rebelskid]

The 75th Ranger Regiment, also known as Army Rangers,[3] is a light infantry airborne special operations force that is part of the United States Army Special Operations Command.[1][4] The Regiment is headquartered at Fort Benning, Georgia and is composed of one special troops battalion and three Ranger battalions.[4] The primary mission of the Regiment is to conduct direct action raids in hostile or sensitive environments worldwide, often killing or capturing high value targets.[4]

[haffast]

CJ, if you are doing s straight copy and paste, take out the little emoji folders. Those folders triggered FR’s auto html which schrunched up your format.

[Defiant]

You are saying the same thing I am. The Supremes changed the law to require “malice” or reckless disregard of the truth, by the press against a public person. That is a lot harder to prove. You still have to prove the falsity of a statement of fact as well. I would get rid of the malice requirement, it is an invention of the court, and gives too much power to our increasingly irresponsible press.

As to the burden of proof, it is a longstanding principle of American jurisprudence, which derives from English law, so I don’t know why they have changed it, that the plaintiff has the burden of proof in a civil case. It is not a big burden; it just means that the evidence favors the plaintiff by a scintilla. It also affects who has the burden of producing evidence first; the plaintiff has to, and then the defense rebuts. I don’t have a problem with leaving that as it is; If you want to sue someone, you need to have the evidence in your favor.

[bitt]

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-met-jussie-smollett-kass-20190219-story.html?utm_campaign=Acquisition_Mass_Send_Recurring&utm_content=acquisition_recurring_acquisition_list_cmp_matching_final&utm_medium=email&utm_source=zaius&zm64_id=Yml0YmVhdGJlYXR0aWVAZ21haWwuY29t

Politicians use Jussie Smollett, while a 1-year-old boy shot in the head is set aside

[haffast]

2858

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 60d97a No.5319456
Feb 22 2019 00:42:43 (EST)
Re: Conservative attacked on UC Berkeley campus
Attacker = member of local ANTIFA chapter (joined April 2018).
Facial scans do not ‘hit’ directly > 2 jumps downstream req.
Q