Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I ran across this fantasy writing and had to share it with you Freepers.

It is excerpted because I don't have the time right now to format it properly.

Sorry.

This guy seems to have a really idealized notion of Socialism. Anyone have any idea who he is?

1 posted on 01/26/2019 2:14:58 PM PST by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Pontiac

Kangas need to place the meth pipe on the table and back away. Playing to the “heads full of mush” he is.


2 posted on 01/26/2019 2:18:26 PM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

He was a lefty though. They goofed in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade when showed him signing that book with his right hand!


3 posted on 01/26/2019 2:18:49 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

“True socialism does not advocate such economic dictatorship — it can only be democratic.” Rubbish. Socialism is ALWAYS coercive. Marxists and Fascists are identical: they are all statists.


4 posted on 01/26/2019 2:19:53 PM PST by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Socialism does not require worker ownership.

Socialism has the state owning the means.

Full-blown communism has the workers owning everything.

Socialisk is the transition stage from capitalism to communism and the communit state is set up as god guide to progress people from socialism to pure communism (which will never happen).

Guy is nuts right here. Knows not what he speaks of.


5 posted on 01/26/2019 2:20:04 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Liberals just don’t like to look in the mirror.


6 posted on 01/26/2019 2:20:28 PM PST by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and America!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

“I ran across this fantasy writing and had to share it with you Freepers”
____________________________

I can post a photo of a turd but why would I?


7 posted on 01/26/2019 2:20:44 PM PST by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Nice try.
Fail to the Nth power (where N is very large).


8 posted on 01/26/2019 2:20:54 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

But socialism requires worker ownership and control of the means of production.


Cuba, Venezuela, and the ex-USSR aren’t socialist by that definition as the govt owned the means of production, not the workers.


9 posted on 01/26/2019 2:20:55 PM PST by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Workers didn’t own squat in The Soviet Union.


12 posted on 01/26/2019 2:22:38 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Goebbels would have disagreed. He called the NSDAP the “German Left”.


14 posted on 01/26/2019 2:24:09 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac
There were no noteworthy differences in mindset...or anything else...between the 20th Century's three great psychopaths:Hitler,Stalin and Mao.
15 posted on 01/26/2019 2:25:17 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Mitt Romney: Bringing Massachusetts Values To The Great State Of Utah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

This is false- socialism does not require both ownership and control of the means of production- that would be communism.

Socialism I that stage before communism when the government takes varying degrees of control over business but does not bear the burden or risks of owning it.


16 posted on 01/26/2019 2:25:39 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac; All
Most Socialist in the 30's were racists as well.

Hitler was clearly in the middle of the left. The left consisted of National socialists and International socialists.

At the end of WWII, the National Socialists had lost and the International Socialists had won.

The mass killings exposed in the Holocaust were exposed and put the National Socialists into disfavor.

The mass killings done by the International Socialists were kept hidden in Russia behind the Iron Curtain.

The idea that Hitler was on the right was concocted by the International Socialists after the war to provide a false choice between National Socialism and International Socialism.

Notice they did not leave any choice for limited government.

18 posted on 01/26/2019 2:26:04 PM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac
This guy seems to have a really idealized notion of Socialism reality.

FIFY

20 posted on 01/26/2019 2:29:07 PM PST by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Well, Hitler was a nationalist, which would position him on the right. On the other hand, his effort was initially a worker uprising.

But on socialism, government ownership is not worker ownership. Government ownership is political class ownership, where some of the wealthier constituents control what the government owns, control the system of socialism and put their children through a fine arts education charade into the more influential, high income government positions.


22 posted on 01/26/2019 2:32:25 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

The problem is that “Leftism” is poorly defined, and for many decades “the Right” was defined as “anybody who opposes International Communism”.

It’s more precise to say that Nazism and Soviet Communism are both examples of Statism, defined as “concentration of economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government often extending to government ownership of industry”.

The main difference between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, was that individuals technically retained ownership in Germany. In reality, the “owners” did as they were told by the State planners.


25 posted on 01/26/2019 2:34:50 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

You’ve gotta love how leftists everywhere claim that other leftists... those who managed to destroy their own countries and killed tens of millions of their own people... were not really leftists because of inconsequential nonsense. These Antifa thugs all the way up to the Chuck and Nancy show, all have a lot in common with Hitler, Stalin, and Mao.


26 posted on 01/26/2019 2:35:00 PM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac
Socialism and Communism are, among others, means to gain power for a totalitarian government.

Hitler didn't give a shiite about the workers (or anyone else for that matter). He wanted the control he needed to make Germany into a mythic power consistent with its Legends.

And BTW, Left and Right mean different things in different places and over time.

Did Hitler want a republic in which power was held by the public and exercised by elected representatives? Er, no.

Did Hitler want a workers paradise? Again, no.

Did Hitler want a Germany (and, for that matter, a world) molded in his own image and conformed by Germanic/Teutonic mythology and paganism?

Ding, ding, ding.

27 posted on 01/26/2019 2:35:10 PM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac
Leftist cucktards want to ignore the essential argument of "freedom and liberty". This is the reason that modern liberalism is a lie, they do not believe in either. Leftists today are definitive totalitarians. Communism, socialism and fascisms are simply different flavors o totalitarian ideologies. It takes a massive centralized government to build ovens and concentration camps, and dictate a national campaign to out those who resist into them.

All modern leftists are the ideological heirs of Hitler and his ovens.

28 posted on 01/26/2019 2:35:42 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pontiac

Here’s a succinct refutation of the notion that the Nazis weren’t socialists.

https://mises.org/library/myth-nazi-capitalism


29 posted on 01/26/2019 2:36:02 PM PST by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson