Posted on 10/05/2018 10:53:33 PM PDT by ransomnote
Will JAMES WOODS be given IMMUNITY and placed in a WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM if he squeals?
Good one!
Zing!
Wow! Nearly the spittin’ image of my daughter!
Good night!
Well, you are a little bit incredible... e.g.: great graphics! 😇
took me a second to notice the cups. Nice!
Then the wise wide Latina?
“2/3rd Senate vote required to impeach SCJ.
What are the odds of that? Q”
I was a little bit concerned about Q’s lack of accuracy about the impeachment process here... Only the House can impeach, and only the Senate can try and remove.
‘Recall’ is very important. Here is one of three amendments put together on FR over the past several years.
************************************************
AMENDMENT XXVIII (’Federal-State Rebalancing’)
To restore the foundational structure of State Legislatures to Congress, the following amendment is proposed:
************************************************
Section 1. Senators in Congress shall be subject to recall by their respective state legislature or by voter referendum in their respective state.
Section 2. Term limits for Senators in Congress shall be set by a vote in their respective state legislatures but in no case shall be set less than two terms nor more than three terms.
Section 3: The seventeenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
************************************************
“Nancy Pelosi and the Wrap Up Smear” Make it a meme!
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”
Alinsky you satanic b@stard, President Trump Read Your BOOK!
Mark
#WAKEUP.jpg
Breyer, appointed by Carter, is 80.
Ginsberg is 85
Sotomayor is 64, but has health issues (diabetic).
It is not too much of a stretch that President Trump could replace all of these Leftist Justices in the next 6 years, in addition to Thomas (voluntary retirement).
“last time they were notified in advance of an assassination attempt.”
What the heck does that MEAN, do you think?
Now that’s just danged effin’ funny right there. BTW...I am a Bigfoot believer, and I command there’ll be no thread slidin’ because I used the BF name.
Hi All! Oh what a glorious day!!!
Posting blind, but I thought it would be appropriate to add to whatever the current conversation is at this time.
I’ve been watching the commentary by Darryl Issa with Judge Jeanine following her interview with POTUS on the phone. He said something that I thought was quite interesting. I backed it up a few times and believe I was able to put together a fair transcript of that tiny fascinating section:
10/6/18 - Judge Jeanine following Kavanaugh’s confirmation and the Trump rally in Topeka KS.
She had DARRYL ISSA on. He made a very curious statement:
She was asking Issa to speak about the emotional roller coaster K has been on. “It has to be bitter sweet for him tonight.”
Issa said, “If he ever has to stand in judgement over elected officials, at least he’ll know how WE* feel. He will be the only person on the court who has ever faced that. Clarence Thomas to a lesser extent, but never anything close to this, and that’s what is really amazing about his confirmation with obviously Joe Manchin a Democrat voting for him, He got through exactly the way someone would expect which is the Democrats never wanted A nother person on the court, and we could have put the late Mother Theresa there and they would have rejected her….”
WAIT - WHAT???!!!!
“IF HE EVER HAS TO STAND IN JUDGEMENT OVER ELECTED OFFICIALS, AT LEAST HE’LL KNOW HOW WE FEEL.”
“ELECTED OFFICIALS????”
“WE?”
Is he hinting at something? Or is he like a John Kasich letting the proverbial Cat out of the Bag?
I sat up even straighter when I heard and was reminded by a question set up by Judge J:
“...I mean you are gonna be leaving. And we are gonna miss you in Congress and we’ll miss having you on Justice...”
This SPECULATION is more than likely very innocent and not relevant at all, but in view of the Military Courts drops and the discussions by Justice K and Sen. Graham about the applicable laws, I had to wonder if there is a Q-Magnitude level to it.
If it is so, could Issa be one who is aware that there are indeed military tribunals in the offing? If he does know of these, is he aware of some of his friends who will be facing them? Is it possible that he himself could be affected by such judgements? Do we know why he left or is leaving Congress? He said “WE.” Is that just deep empathy for those who would be facing such a tribunal, or could it be a personal fear?
I apologize for not being able to find a a link to the show. I’m writing this as the show is still on.
*I backed up the video several times to verify that he did indeed say “we” and not “they” as I had thought at first that I heard. In fact, on the hearing captions, the transcript which FOX posted showed “we.”
Mark has changed his thinking on Trump. People complain that Mark is too angry, but he has a lot to be angry with.
He used to post on FR during the Whitewater years. He was driven off or left at some point. I Listen to him in the evenings sometimes. He knows the law and the history surrounding the law. If you don’t want to listen don’t, but he can be trusted.
Now, do I need to back away from those claws?
Not only that but she was describing how they “merchandise” the whole thing... those ubiquitous emails begging for money I suppose. I finally got off Ted Cruz’ list. Don’t know how, I understand he’s in a bit of a tight race with a loonie.
I live in DogMan's county. Haven't seen him yet, but last week a bear ate my daughter's 2005 Camry. Bigfoot doesn't destruct property, does he?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.