Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired Justice Stevens: Kavanaugh should not be confirmed
The Hill ^ | 10/04/18 | TAL AXELROD

Posted on 10/04/2018 2:07:22 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens on Thursday said that he does not believe President Trump Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should be confirmed to the high court.

Stevens told a small crowd in Boca Raton, Fla., he once believed Kavanaugh to be qualified, but his performance in Senate Judiciary hearings changed his mind, according to The Palm Beach Post.

“I’ve changed my views for reasons that have no relationship to his intellectual ability,” Stevens said, noting Kavanaugh's fiery denial of sexual misconduct accusations in a Senate Judiciary Hearing last week.

“The Senators should pay attention to this,” Stevens added.

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, a lifelong Republican, told a small crowd in Boca Raton that Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s performance at confirmation hearings should disqualify him. “The Senators should pay attention to this.”

— Lulu Ramadan (@luluramadan) October 4, 2018 Stevens said that criticism over Kavanaugh's temperament for the court following the heated testimony before the panel had “merit.”

Kavanaugh's nomination has been mired by three women accusing him of varying degrees of sexual misconduct from when he was in high school and in college.

Kavanaugh has fiercely denied all the allegations.

Last week, Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, the first of the three accusers, testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee in a hearing.

Kavanaugh offered a blistering denial of any wrongdoing and often engaged in tense exchanges with Democrats on the committee. At one point he asked Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) if she had ever blacked out from drinking after she asked him the same question.

The nominee’s conduct during the hearing caught the attention of many on the left, who cited his temperament as another reason to vote “no” on his confirmation. Klobuchar later said that if she “was in his courtroom and acted like that, he would have thrown me out.”

The FBI returned results of a week-long investigation into the allegations to the Senate on Thursday.

Senate Republicans claim that there was no corroborating evidence for any of the claims against Kavanaugh and have vowed to confirm the nominee in a vote over the weekend.

Stevens, a nominee of former President Ford, retired in 2010. He was replaced by President Obama nominee Elena Kagan.


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister
KEYWORDS: justicestevens; kavanaugh; kavanuagh; scotus; wgaf; wgara
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: yesthatjallen

Isn’t this the guy who every now and then goes on about how much of a fraud the NRA is trying to perpetuate concerning the Second Amendment?


21 posted on 10/04/2018 2:13:37 PM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Stevens said that criticism over Kavanaugh's temperament for the court following the heated testimony before the panel had “merit.”

Stevens has apparently never been publicly maligned for things he never did. Kavanaugh gave vent to justifiable (and righteous) anger due to the ongoing, hyperpartisan smear the democrats were orchestrating.

A judge, when acting as an officer of the law, must maintain an even demeanor (unlike RBG). When reacting to a blatant smear, they need to act like a man (or woman, as the case may be).

Stevens is full of shiite.

22 posted on 10/04/2018 2:13:52 PM PDT by MortMan (The white board is a remarkable invention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Why is that decrepit old sh*t still sucking oxygen???


23 posted on 10/04/2018 2:14:08 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Who care what this has-been has to say. He has screwed the country enough.


24 posted on 10/04/2018 2:15:17 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

After the treatment he received by the democrats, I doubt very seriously that Kavanaugh will turn into a liberal squish like Stevens, Souter or Kennedy. He will remember this every time he makes a decision. I’m hoping he ends up to the right of Thomas. I’m confident that he will be to the right of Kennedy.


25 posted on 10/04/2018 2:15:35 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If Judge Kavanaugh had a history of being a fiery lunatic on the bench, I would think that would be well established by now.

The fact that our next Supreme Court justice demonstrated the ability to get mad as hell when falsely accused of serious crime is the sign of a strong and decent man. If I recall correctly the calm and clear response was provided. It was AFTER the Left made his (and his family’s) life a living hell that he showed anger. And he damn well should have.

Maybe the former justice Stevens should drink less soy milk. Jackass.


26 posted on 10/04/2018 2:15:43 PM PDT by Made In The USA (Next thing you know, 'ol Jed's a millionaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Stevens said that criticism over Kavanaugh's temperament for the court following the heated testimony before the panel had “merit.”

Liberals' latest argument is almost comical. "We tried to destroy Brett Kavanaugh's personal and professional reputation with totally baseless charges that he is a serial gang rapist. We failed and now we're worried that he won't give our liberal causes a fair shake in the Supreme Court. Can you please nominate someone different?"

As Cocaine Mitch once said...


27 posted on 10/04/2018 2:15:45 PM PDT by Drew68 (Twitter @TheRealDrew68 https://twitter.com/TheRealDrew68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Who cares?


28 posted on 10/04/2018 2:15:46 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Kindness and truth shall meet." Ps. 85:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Drop dead, Stevens.


29 posted on 10/04/2018 2:16:05 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Couldn’t be more inappropriate.


30 posted on 10/04/2018 2:16:10 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th; raygunfan; Gamecock; Larry Lucido; KC_Lion; FredZarguna; PROCON

Too bad he doesn’t get a vote.

I’ll bet he didn’t have much, if any problem(s) with Barack Hussein Obama, though.

Did he stay silent on Barack for 8 years like W?

His opinion and $4.50 can get him the Early Bird Special. Before 4:30 p.m. You know what that costs you after 4:30 p.m.?

No, I don’t have respect for someone still going leftist at that age. Way past time to have seen how this country is circling the toilet. Guess he spends his whole day watching CNN, MSNBC, reading The New York Times, etc.


31 posted on 10/04/2018 2:16:33 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Oooh, sorry, that just happens from time to time, judge...


32 posted on 10/04/2018 2:16:56 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

33 posted on 10/04/2018 2:17:57 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Someone had to track him down to get a comment.

If he said he supported Kavanaugh I doubt they would have reported it.

They're grasping for anything now.

34 posted on 10/04/2018 2:18:20 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonFire

Justice Stevens is not a person whose opinion I value. I think he’s just acting out on sour grapes that there would be no such gathering of loyalty and love for him as has come about for Judge Kavanaugh and his family and their friends.


35 posted on 10/04/2018 2:18:22 PM PDT by Notthereyet (Notthereyet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Republicans have had many chances to have a truly conservative court. O’Conner, Souter, Stevens, just a few of the RINOs that the moderate country club GOP has burdened us with.

GOP better learn to fight. I understand that the Bush’s and McConnell wanted Kav over Barrett so we wonder if he is a real conservative vote like Scalia was may he R.I.P.


36 posted on 10/04/2018 2:18:58 PM PDT by Zenjitsuman (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“I’ve changed my views for reasons that have no relationship to his intellectual ability,”

So Kavanaugh is qualified. That’s all I needed to know.


37 posted on 10/04/2018 2:18:58 PM PDT by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

At age 20, Stevens was the reason that I foolishly voted for Carter over Ford. The guy is a waste.


38 posted on 10/04/2018 2:19:25 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("We circle each other in flight Til together we roll like the ocean In its bed at night" Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Shut up you old RINO coot! Go take your dementia meds.

Good GAWD, hold the vote and confirm BK so @seholes like this stupid codger will shut the h*ll up!


39 posted on 10/04/2018 2:19:30 PM PDT by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, a lifelong Republican“

LMAO!!!! Oh, bullcrap...


40 posted on 10/04/2018 2:19:44 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson