Posted on 09/09/2018 5:27:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
I say that's not true. I've been researching deeds in my area dating back to 1790's and found that 90% of the deeds were held by women. Rumour is that that was to make sure that the husbands would not gamble away the homestead while intoxicated.
The modern romance: I want to have your abortion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Please do not do that. Every war requires sacrifices, and Generals (or CINCs) who send their forces into battle must deal with that aspect.
Thank you. Another feminazi myth bites the dust.
LOL!
Attila was a master general, whereas you're just an armchair QB. I'm highly doubtful the Hun would do anything along the lines you're advocating, simply because he would most likely follow an approach similar to the one another strategic mastermind - one Pres Donald J Trump - is currently taking.
Ask yourself this simple question: why is the press still there? In reality, there are only two viable answers:
1. Trump's not in control: he cannot get rid of the press without significant political cost; or
2. Trump is in control: he can easily get rid of the roaches, but prefers the situation as it stands. (That is, allowing them to continuously discredit themselves and destroy their credibility.)
If you have some insight to a 3rd option, please share it. I happen to believe that Trump is fully control of all facets of these wartime operations, and those press maggots are in the WH because he wants them there.
If we're smart enough to understand that the titles at qmap.pub are NOT placed there by Q, but are interpretations and general titles of the Q drop itself (outside comms), they can be used as GUIDES and ASSISTANCE in our own interpreting. That's how I understand and use them.
It just takes understanding and ability. If other people can't do that, then oh well. Woe be unto the simple.
Bagster
Which one?
THen you get it posted and the first five replies are ALREADY POSTED!!! Thread police. PaTROLLing.
The Clarence Thomas/Roy Moore gambit.
#DerpKitchenSink
Bagster
40+yrs ago stuff got rid of Roy Moore, why not Kavanaugh too?
Worked once for the rats you can be assured they’ll do it again and again and again.
De phone go green green, so I pink it up and say, “Yellow, hostess?”
True... I didn't say 'Change my mind', only reconsider. I have always heard how loyal Trump is to those who are loyal to him. [?] A lot here that we just do not know.
Q
What the heck, it's worth a shot, huh? In football, if a play works, you keep running it until the other team adjusts.
Although, the Moore attacks were better conceived and positioned, because they had multiple complainants (even if politically motivated), the accusation was of abuse by an older man, and finally, because Moore was frankly rather pathetic in speaking on his own behalf.
Here, you're talking about a woman of high school age remembering something about another high school student 40 years ago. And, as someone pointed out, Kavanaugh went to a boy's school, so this purported incident is likely a one-shot observation or interaction, rather than a pattern.
Concur. He is letting the press play themselves, as Q has informed us.
But make no mistake. Trump is Sun Tzu, not Attila.
Attila would just cut their heads off and put 'em on sticks, as a warning to the others.
#ProblemSolved
signed;
Bagster The Armchair Uber General Of The Entire World
Bagster
The problem is that the first mover in social media has everyone on it, all sides, including those muddle headed folks in the middle. If you set up an alternative for free speech you may be a lot of conservatives to join. But you won’t get any liberals, who are their family members, and you probably won’t get any of those middling folks who would see no reason to leave their comfortable existing platform. It would become an echo chamber, and would probably not be as populated by conservatives as even the censored sites are.
It’s a conundrum. I am open to the notion that the law of privately owned public space applies to these social media monopolies, and finding a way to require that they not censor speech. The government doesn’t need to regulate; it just needs to say that social media monopolies can’t censor, and then let those censored sue and force those companies to comply with the rules.
Well, it is not grounds for argument. Trump has his methods and I would have mine - subject to advise and consent ;^) [Politics is the science of compromise - B Ireland]
Thank you for that analysis.
JEH was anti-socialist/Communist. His files would have been extensive.
Now knowing the totality of the Deep State’s socialist leanings since the 1940s, could Deep Throat, Woodward, and Bernstein have been acting as Deep State Agents in the Nixon Coup?
Always remember that the MSM (agent of the Deep State) has controlled every aspect of news received by the American Public since the 1940s. It shaped America’s perceptions of the infiltration of Marxist into our government during the 40s and 50s, the Korean Conflict, the Vietnam War, and Watergate.
This same MSM has shaped Americans perceptions of social issues and morality. It started through motion pictures and migrated to television in the 50s.
I know many will yell, tin foil hat time, but the more that is revealed, the more the likelihood that we have had truth spun on its head, since the 1940s.
Socialist have always worn masks, to conceal their real motives and intents. Bill and Hillary have sold out the US over and over again. It continued under Obama, and Hillary believed she’d never lose.
The entire charade is an attempt by the Socialist Left to perform another coup. Again, to remove a duly elected President from office, and shut down all conservative opposition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.