Well, it is not grounds for argument. Trump has his methods and I would have mine - subject to advise and consent ;^) [Politics is the science of compromise - B Ireland]
I sorta cannot believe you just admitted that. Maybe I should go easy on you, since you seem to lack basic rhetorical skills. Pro tip #1: never personalize a recommended action - it reeks of ego and self indulgence; and #2, never state something you would or wouldn't do if there is an absolute zero chance of you ever having the opportunity to exercise that authority.
Here's a friendly reminder from TR of why critics should moderate their opinions with respect to judging another man's intentions and/or efforts:
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.