You be nice, you.
Posted on 09/07/2018 8:36:37 AM PDT by Jack Black
OAN Exclusive: Online Movement QANON Exposed as Hoax
You be nice, you.
Deep thinker.
#GeniusLevel
What a horrible miscarriage of justice.
Shall I call 9-1-1?
You seem to be a very resolute man lol.
I think soya is feeling the heat due to the Epstein 'matter'. Jack may be many things (and he is) but I think he can read the tea leaves.
One last ditch effort, eh?
#TheBigPush
Wow. This thread is one year old and it took you that long to come up with a devastating rejoinder like, “Are you fat”?
I will bet that timed test were hell for you before you dropped out of high school.
But listen loser, I need to get ready for work. I can’t trade insults with your loser ass all day. In fact I’m not wasting anymore time on you, period.
Sometimes you have to explain things like the Q believers are five years old, because a lot of them are operating on that level.
Thanks dad.
This thread is almost a year old, nobody posted on it for nine months, since Sept 19, 2018 until you did, a couple days ago.
You used this thread to taunt Mac Truck with your "Where’s your microchip now troll?"
With the thread tickled awake centurion316 pinged me, and I attempted to answer your question. Microchip is still around, Microchip has never backed down on his claims.
I know you and the Q-faithful all declared him "debunked", but I followed the discussions on several sites last year and I did not, at the time, agree that Microchip's claims had been debunked. Some people very invested in keeping Q alive (Neon Revolt) as I recall, tried to do the debunking, but it weak, was answered with compelling counter-arguments by Microchip.
Microchip is where he is. You saying "he's been debunked" doesn't make it so.
You say: Or maybe one of you trolls want to take a stab At how he could post and article on the 14th that wasn't published untill 16th.
Microchip's counter-claim was that Discord had a known system clock problem.
He asked Neon Revolt (or anyone else) to back date something and show it on the Discord mobile app on an iPhone, and no one could.
I viewed the claims and counter-claims as essentially a draw.
As for some of your other comments, I don't understand them.
"Sadly no takers in funding your stupid score card."I never sought funding for my score card. I don't run a Q-based web site, have a YouTube channel, sell T-shirts or any other form on monetization of either the Q or anti-Q position. And, never have.
My scorecard was my attempt to quantify Q coming to pass. Seeing as everyone on the Q thread got so mad about it, I no longer maintain or post it.
But now that you've brought it up: Team Trump still hasn't landed a single blow against the leaders of the Deep State Coup: Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Susan Rice, Strzok, Page, Hillary, Podesat, Huma, Lynch, etc.
We are all still waiting. Maybe it happens, or maybe they all walk. which is really sad and pathetic if it happens.
Conservative Gato, I'm not sure what you mean by: You are posting that fake maga, maga coalition’s false narrative about the Q movement". If you are referring to the original article from last Sept, it was newsworthy at the time, and obviously interesting enough to generate 150 replies back then. I don't think that posting this in Sept. 2018 says anything horrible about me, then or now.
You go on, in another post to say: "I don't see what some FReepers problems with this movement is. It's on the same page to get our Republic back whether you choose to follow what is going on or not.". That's an excellent point, and I agree with it.
Who Q is, exactly, is interesting but the movement is so large now that it's not the only issue that determines all others. The research that people do is very interesting, regardless of whether Q is the Trump-connected intel group they claim, or merely patriotic hackers on 8chad, as others claim.
FWIW, the Epstein info was dropped by the President's Q team long ago so we've just been waiting for it to play out and IT IS. That's true. It certainly brought Q back to life, after a month of silence, he came roaring back to assert that Epstein proves Q.
One of the vectors, of the three, does fit into the narrative of "things were put in place by Sessions and are playing out now" - that is the arrest of Epstein in New York.
But, please admit, Epstein was already on a lot of people's radar since his arrest.
Julie Brown, the reporter who did the incredible series on Epstein at the Miami Herald did more than Q to make Epstein a topic of conversation again.
Jack Posobiec, the same guy as this thread began with, was the person who initiated the lawsuit to get the materials from the Maxwell lawsuit released. I don't think Q can take credit for that, seeing as Posobiec started the whole "Microchip is Q" meme (regardless of whether you believe it or think it's BS). As far as I konw Posobiec has never self-repudiated his original story about Microchip.
And then you wrongfully accuse me of: "But no, Jackie is back to his old ways by trying to drum up these old debunked attempts to take down the Q movement.
BiggBob raised this thread from the dead, not me. BigBobb asked what happened to MicroChip and I answered. I'm not trying to drum up anything.
Which brings me to the main antagonist, Bagster. Hi! Nice to see you! I sent you emails when you were in FRjail, but you never wrote back. Thanks for coming outside the tree line and posting 13 consecutive posts on this thread. WOW! That's the old Bagster spirit! And still a master of tongue-in-cheek humor, as always.
You are unbroken, unbowed and remorseless in your beliefs about Q. The Q debunkers, including the original focus of this article are similarly sticking by their guns.
Carry on, one and all. Let the disputation continue!
PS: BiggBob: lighten up on the name calling. "Troll" "Idiot Troll" "Soy".
I don't show up on the Eternal Q Thread and call people names, it's just not necessary, it's counter productive.
IF Q is True, then the end result is A Great Awakening, which implies lots of people who disbelieve, or are agnostic, or Q-questioning come on board. Which means you guys, the early adopters, the Apostles of Q, need to be tolerant and forgiving of the non-Q people (who are still the vast majority). For the great awakening to happen many more have to come on across, which they aren't going to do if you routinely insult them (us) as "trolls" "idiot trolls" "soy", etc. Act like others who seek to englighten people about an important truth: like a Buddhist monk or Christian evangelist.
Cheers!
Don’t forget you can’t spell Posobiec without POS
2124
Amateurish Attempt at Faking a Chat Log
9 Sep 2018 - 6:57:37 PM
Alex Jones and Associates Trying to Deceive and Divide You
2123
Q
9 Sep 2018 - 6:55:52 PM
>>2950600
Last and final comment(s) re: AJ & Associates [attempts]
Logical thinking.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1038778638613839872
[0:21]
Breitbart article linked [2 days prior] to the article being published?
Reconcile.
Note the time?
[9:41]
[100%]
Note Apple’s stock image(s)?
[9:41]
[100%]
Reconcile.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMfCvmykRxg&app=desktop
Reconcile.
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1038858004899266564
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/974008177271410688.html
Reconcile.
Attempts to deceive AUTISTS/ANONS will FAIL.
We are a threat to their livelihood [+CLAS].
Do not let their attempts corrupt GOOD organizations.
Think OANN.
They want you DIVIDED.
Stay STRONG.
Stay TOGETHER.
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1038898688725270533
“Division keeps them in power.”
Q
Aha. The old "had a known system clock problem" trick. Get's 'em every time.
Which brings me to the main antagonist, Bagster.
*blush*
IF Q is True, then the end result is A Great Awakening...
Your fundamental misunderstanding is showing.
"The Great Awakening" is not the destination, its the journey.
One soya at a time.
I'm not quite sure that's true, soya.
Didn't you just go on the Q thread and call softengine an anti-semite?
In your usual subtle, coded method of course, so you could later say "I never said no sucha thing".
"I never said no sucha thing" in 3..2..1...
#BagsterSpeaksJive
No, I didn't. I'd show you by referring to the original comments, but someone got the comment zot'd, so it's not there for me to quote.
Which is odd, I wonder who'd a done that, and why?
But, anyway, I accept that some people on FR are not familiar with that usage which is why I did not accuse anyone of intent, only pointed out what it is commonly understood as. Softengine replied that he was unaware of that.
I view use of triple parens as just more 8chan dreck sadly finding it's way onto Free Republic. We have had a good culture here for >20 years, and we don't need to import theirs (I think some FreeQs were making the same point about posting the entire intro-text of the 8chan Q-research board on the Q thread)
What's ironic is that I've seen posts where (((you))) use it.
Go figure.
Someone could use it without understanding the accepted meaning, and then end up being wrongly accused by others. Which, in fact, was the case with Sofstengine's use of the symbol. It was unwitting.
You're saying that because Jack Black has been using parenthesis in anti-semitic manner long before shills flooded 8ch to post that trash amIright?
I posted the two examples below on 7/20/2019, 6:41:55 PM. Good thing I made screen captures because you can click on the image of Jack's posts, or the link below it to witness Jack's particular "understanding" of the Anti-Semetic use of parenthesis, but I think they are going to be deleted like some of his other posts.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EXAMPLE 1
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3462508/posts?page=13#13
EXAMPLE 2
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3454561/posts?page=4#4
urrite as usual, my dear.
#Busted
Jack Black:
One starts to think that the NeoCons really do require absolute fidelity to their (((main issue))) as table stakes, and are not merely well-meaning Republicans scared of a uniquely frightening nominee, as they pretend.
So if I have this right, soya is saying that the (((joos))) are the 'neocons' (((main issue))).
Am I reading that right, soya?
Feel free to tell the truth (((for once))). It's just us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.