Q Anon: 08/21/18 "Trust The Plan"

To: edzo4; eldoradude; TEXOKIE

The Steinweigh is a heavy piano that floats in dreams above imaginary worlds!

The Steinway piano (name trademarked) is a heavy piano which sits on the floor and provides shade to bean bags.

641 posted on 08/23/2018 5:22:43 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission

To: Despot of the Delta

Oh, I see our 9mo studies manifesting in reality everyday, all around us. I read and witness CINC synchronicities in Trust the Plan whenever he speaks: I’ve not lost faith, just aware some critical operational details we couldn’t be told for natsec sometimes kink the grok of the plan up. McLettuce, forex: is he on ice and can’t be wheeled in for a vote? Rumors on that Monday, and that surely explains a lot of the very recent senatorial (ex- and current) funkiness.

642 posted on 08/23/2018 5:24:59 PM PDT by txhurl

Learned an interesting fact today: 86% of those incarcerated in prisons came out of the foster care system.

That number seems awfully high to me. do you have a source?

643 posted on 08/23/2018 5:25:17 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

I think if Gault could be a poor woman, I might be him. I’m pretty sure I’ve gone Gault already... but I have no tribe!! LOL!

644 posted on 08/23/2018 5:28:50 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

Yeah, sometimes DS gets lucky and throws off the timetable. I just wonder if the 187 attempts on POTUS will be released or kept quiet.

645 posted on 08/23/2018 5:31:17 PM PDT by Despot of the Delta

646 posted on 08/23/2018 5:36:01 PM PDT by MomwithHope

To: little jeremiah; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; ...

[RE: discussion regarding texokie’s report on Beatles’ “PAUL” findings.]
little jeremiah said:

Didn’t mean to pound you

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I appreciate that very much. We ARE Friends! :-)

I’m glad to know now about this Gibson guy. You did the right thing to tell me about him.

However, I went back to look, and I was not able to find that the links I posted were attributable to him. I realize I could have missed it, but as I said, I’m not very adept at dealing with youtube format.

I also cited a book, and I don’t think that was attributable to Gibson either. The point is, that there actually seem to be several sources examining this highly controversial topic. The theory is being examined. I honestly think my post raised some legitimate questions.

I really pondered if I had erred in posting the results of my bunny dive into the Beatles. I could not understand the blowback I seemed to be getting. According to the standards I seek to follow in examining and reporting information, this topic seemed relevant. Did I somehow violate those standards? Not only my personal ones, but even those of this thread as well?

I was replying to a comment in which Beatle John Lennon’s MKUltra killer - was mentioned. This “Paul” data seemed to be a very legitimate topic which seemed in my mind to be relevant to the discussion.

I expected debate. Of Points, and the Data I brought. Not besmirching of my sources, - which upon inspection, do not seem to be the sources I used. If I used bad sources, I tender apology - if I did use a bad source it was inadvertent.

But I was not seeking to say those sources are correct. I was reporting what I found regarding the topic. I was blown away by it, as it was the first I had heard of it. I was hoping others had explored this and had come to some conclusions already. I was hoping that if this was a fruitless topic, that actual reasons - based on refutation of the data, would be offered.

If I had transgressed, I could not figure out what the violations might have been.

Then I realized there is a very obvious connection to previous researching I (and others) had done which, in my opinion, had been overlooked. I think it ought to be at least considered before rejecting the examination of the Beatles topic outright:

In a recent research series involving not only my work, but with help of several of our outstanding researchers, we examined the roots and the skullduggery at Laurel Canyon, California.

We examined its roots back to the early 1900s. We saw how a number of people from the upper-connected Cabal class from England were part of the bunch who settled in Laurel Canyon. We saw how they had enough juice to get the LA City government to spring for sending the first trolley lines to that canyon area.

We learned that Laurel Canyon was a major locus for CIA/Intel/MKUltra/Rock-Music operations. These activities are well documented and known to many who examine such things.

Why would it be such a stretch to think that ENGLAND’s Intel/Cabal people - who sent reps from ENGLAND to America to start operations - would not have similar Intel/ Mind Control operations on their home soil?

What if the Beatles were equally the intelligence ops involved band that we now see that many of the early major American rock-music musicians were?

Talented and beloved musicians all, but IMHO it behooves us to look a little deeper at them and who was using them, or controlling them....or even whom might some of THEM have been using?

I don’t know. Just asking.

I wonder if I got blowback because I might have gotten over some kind of target without realizing it?

Naaaaaaaah. Couldn’t possibly be THAT! .....Could it?
We’ve never seen that here before.

647 posted on 08/23/2018 5:36:50 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

LOL!

It’s very full, - strings, and keys, and pedals, and all that...and the Qanteen musicians do a whale of a job producing gorgeous sounds of “Chop Sticks” (and sometimes other things) on it!

648 posted on 08/23/2018 5:41:26 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

To: JockoManning

Trump can’t take that route as it would provide the perfect opportunity to impeach. He’s gotta do it strictly by the book. As it should be really.

649 posted on 08/23/2018 5:44:49 PM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)

It’s a beauty, ain’t it????

:-D

650 posted on 08/23/2018 5:45:11 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

651 posted on 08/23/2018 5:45:28 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

Aw, there’s probably hundreds under seal in the County courts back up in the Hills. They’ll get around to mailing the numbers in one of these days. :)

652 posted on 08/23/2018 5:47:25 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission

To: JockoManning

.
Sedition is only a word. It is not defined of law.

653 posted on 08/23/2018 5:48:55 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)

To: Jamie Von - conspiracytheorist

Welcome to Free Republic. Glad to have you aboard.

654 posted on 08/23/2018 5:50:06 PM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)

To: Despot of the Delta

When the DS divides and drives the people to civil war, you may expect that the Left would be moralized by the dozen attempts on DJT, and we would be no better if we were moralized by attempts on zero during ValJar’s reign of terror. That’s how toxic Bush-Clinton-Obama has rendered us :(

655 posted on 08/23/2018 5:50:09 PM PDT by txhurl

To: editor-surveyor

656 posted on 08/23/2018 5:50:52 PM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)

For the perusal of the group - the CIA promoted the modern art movement:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html

“The decision to include culture and art in the US Cold War arsenal was taken as soon as the CIA was founded in 1947. Dismayed at the appeal communism still had for many intellectuals and artists in the West, the new agency set up a division, the Propaganda Assets Inventory, which at its peak could influence more than 800 newspapers, magazines and public information organisations. They joked that it was like a Wurlitzer jukebox: when the CIA pushed a button it could hear whatever tune it wanted playing across the world.”

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Thank you for the very relevant information. America has been under attack from within for a very long time.

657 posted on 08/23/2018 5:50:58 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

What's a Grecian urn?

That's what I wanna know.

Bagster

658 posted on 08/23/2018 5:54:57 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

I believe the list we are seeing is all federal. But as I mentioned, this could mean multiple indictments on the same individual so we should not expect 40,000 people to go to court.

So, what are the odds that 39,998 of the indictments are of Bill and Hillary? /sarc>

659 posted on 08/23/2018 5:56:33 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

To: JockoManning

it is relatively unlikely that such a justification would be very tenuous, weak, prone to being overturned etc. I don't think POTUS et al are that stupid.

Exactly my point.

Bagster

660 posted on 08/23/2018 5:57:23 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794