ask them if they've ever heard of "Qualitative Easing" and how much do they think that contributed to the so called growth, the Fed and cooking the books growth was mostly smoke and mirrors
Posted on 07/28/2018 8:01:20 AM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD
Liberal college pal says that Obummer had "75 straight quarters of growth. It's so conveeeeeeeenient to forget the shithole the economy was when he took over!"
I need verbal ammo to reply to this diatribe.
Help! Ayuda!
"Liberal friend" is a math impaired liberal idiot for making the statement.
You, on the other hand, are a math impaired conservative one.
75/4= 18.75 Obama was still a STATE senator back then.
Google historical yearly! gdp. Forget about quarter over quarter growth.The economy sucked under Obama
.
Suggest he check any claim he has heard before showing his ignorance by quoting it. Then check the facts for yourself - see http://www.multpl.com/us-gdp-growth-rate/table/by-quarter for an actual listing showing how even the fear of his election sent the economy down while actual election put it in a tailspin for a year of negative numbers only barely going positive at the end of 2009.
Maybe, just maybe, he could learn to stop taking the mainstream media reporters and pundits at their word. But not likely - that would require actually thinking for him or her self.
Obama had the worst recovery from a recession than any president.
lowest labor participation rate for Obama, highest ever for Trump!
Manufacturing very poor under Obama said those jobs would never come back.
manufacturing revitalized under Trump very big.
Record capital investment under Trump. These are durable goods like machinery new plants etc..
Because of tax cuts we have enormous overseas money coming back to the U.s.
etc.,etc.,etc.
I doubt your friend could comprehend basic Econ.It might be a waste of time .
Useless conversation and argument. Avoid those people. It doesn’t matter what you tell them, they’re only going to hear what they want to hear until we get Venezuelaized.
Why are you posting this to me? I’m not the original poster.
ask them if they've ever heard of "Qualitative Easing" and how much do they think that contributed to the so called growth, the Fed and cooking the books growth was mostly smoke and mirrors
It's pointless to argue with morons, especially those that worship the antiCHRIST 0bama. Besides, libs never let the true facts stand in their way while screaming some idiot contention they have.
I would argue that since the contention does not mention finical quarters that anything can be put in such as 75 straight quarters of ignorance, propaganda, government theft or anything that is your pet peeve.
Largely true, but why lose the opportunity to win others over by successfully refuting the liberal arguments?
This point has prolly been made several times already, but:
Eight miserable, traitorous, genuinely racist years x 4 quarters/year = 32 quarters = another lie from the faggot halfrican toad and her delusional sycophants.
That oughta get the point across, ehh ?
Watch the video in the link. This is Obama’s infamous “magic wand” remark that makes him look like a fool now.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/281936-obama-to-trump-what-magic-wand-do-you-have
Fake numbers for a fake POTUS.
Everything about that unqualified, ineligible, faggy, jug-eared foreign POS was/is either a fake or a lie.
If it was so great under Obama why did he blame Bush for 8 years for a terrible economy?
Shutting that down is easy.. only Obama’s has the distinction of NeVer having a year of 3% or higher GDP growth... every President since WWII except Obama had at least 1 3% or better year during their administration..
Obama’s economy was Excrement...
Lol. Why do you waste time and aggravate yourself by arguing with morons?
I have some liberals in my family. The most I do is laugh in their faces and walk away. They’ve learned to leave me alone with their stupid politics.
I don’t interact much with liberal relatives. Zero is the amount I go for.
As soon as you hear that seeming big number 75 you know you’re being scammed. This is what I call a Mario Coumo stat. Bozo’s economy stats were uniformly anemic, weak. This is the only way to phrase Bozo’s performance with a large sounding number in it. Bozo’s performance was below that every president before him (and after).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.