Posted on 04/10/2018 9:12:17 PM PDT by Perseverando
As scientists, we are concerned about recent discussions regarding clergy sexual abuse. Numerous authors, like a recent Chilean post by Riccardo Cascioli (February 8, 2018), seem to believe there is a significant difference between pedophiles and homosexuals.
Indeed, Riccardo Cascioli re-makes a point often made: the so-called pedophilia cases are actually an overwhelming majority of incidents of homosexuality[1] where
pedophilia properly refers to the attraction of adults for pre-pubescent children. When such attraction is directed towards teenagers, one must instead speak of ephebophilia which is initiated by homosexual persons. This is what we are talking about in Chile, but it also is true for at least 80% of the cases which erroneously reported in the news as cases of pedophilia in the Catholic Church. This is at least the conclusion which emerges from the reports of John Jay College on the cases of abuse registered in the Catholic Church in the United States. [These facts allow] us to say clearly that the problem in the Catholic Church is not pedophilia but homosexuality.
While we heartily agree that the problem is one of homosexuality, we would make five points: 1.Pedophilia is not an exclusive orientation.
(Excerpt) Read more at barbwire.com ...
A pedophile who prefers little boys is a homosexual.
A pedophile who prefers little girls is not a homosexual.
They are both perverts.
This is going to bring out the vicious responses from the “loving” ones.
And when a 20 or 30 something female teacher has sex with a twelve year old boy, that’s “homosexuality”? I don’t think so, but it is pedophilia.
There is and can be contexts where the two things - pedophilia and homosexuality - appear together. But there are always contexts where both things are not present together; just one or the other. It is wrong to lump them together as if the same thing or always together.
Woe to him who steals the innocence from a child and sets the child on the path of evil.
Repentance is your only hope.
No, but a contributor to leftist Salon magazine has argued the existence of "virtuous pedophiles."
I read 25% of pedophile attacks identify as homosexual.
Yup. I left out a syllable (here).
My point was really that modern dictionaries seem to have phased out the wordperhaps under pressure from colleges. My old dictionaries have it: paperbacks less so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.