Posted on 03/09/2018 12:57:47 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3637830/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
http://qanonmap.github.io
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3637271/posts?page=5#5
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Perfect solution. . . Irish coffee.
If we/they can get 52 of them together, a deck of playing cards would be in the works. Not actual playing cards, although that’s possible too. Kind of cool, these cards.
bongino killing it again tonight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQHPX5FKoz4&t=628s
connecting Alexander Downer to Terry Mcaulife and Mccabe And Clinton’s brother on Huawei cell phones...
The U.S. Government Should Show Its Work
Washington is suspicious of Huawei smartphones—but it won’t tell us why.
https://slate.com/technology/2018/01/the-u-s-government-is-suspicious-of-huawei-smartphones.html
Just as the government offered no evidence when it very publicly cut ties with Russian security firm Kaspersky Lab due to concerns about Russian espionage, very little information has been made public about why exactly Congress, the FBI, and the NSA believe that Huawei’s phones are insecure. So much for my hopes that 2018 might usher in a new era of the U.S. government sharing more specific details about cybersecurity threats!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Rodham
Nevertheless, Bill Clinton did help him get a job with longtime Clintons associate Terry McAuliffe to find foreign investors for McAuliffe’s GreenTech Automotive firm.[8][26] Rodham did not play a large, hands-on role in this effort, however, and a trip to China that he made to recruit investors went sour due to Chinese resentment of various Clinton administration actions including the 1999 U.S. bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade.[26] Rodham found himself in the news again in 2013 when it was disclosed that Alejandro Mayorkas, the director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and President Obama’s nominee for United States Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, was being investigated by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General for Mayorkas’ role in helping Gulf Coast Funds Management secure approval for participating in the EB-5 visa program for foreign investors.[27] Rodham had been president and CEO of Gulf Coast Funds Management, a financing firm, since 2010 or so.[28] The firm had been granted the go-ahead even though the original application had been denied and an appeal had been rejected.[29] At least one of the visas that Rodham’s firm was trying to acquire was for Huawei Technologies, a Chinese telecommunications company sometimes accused of close connections with Chinese intelligence operations.
You forgot brilliant and magnificently sexy.
And remember this Jocko. Never, EVER disagree with me. Does the lion worry about the opinions of the sheep?
Hahahahaha. Just kidding.
You may disagree with me once a month. You have used up March's quota. :)
In keeping with your traditional obstreperous and obnoxiously witty affronteries to social norms and the conventional connective tissues of society
I'll just have to start disagreeing with you on odd days and twice on Saturday.
Can't have you getting too smug and lofty in your prissy confidence in your own grandeur.
On the topic of the "receivership," ...
It is a rather specific term. I do NOT think it would have been used except about a corporation in this context. And, THAT corporation is ripe for POTUS doing exactly what he said he'd do with such wealth in his December Executive Order.
I just can't imagine it being thrown around willy nilly about anything BUT a legal receivership designed to protect the wealth and operations of a corporation.
Just doesn't make sense, to me.
LOL no arguments nothing...
Figured the ones open minded enough will go look.
:) love it.
These are Ashkenazi: not real Jews (they coverted as a nation hundreds and hundreds of years ago) , not Semitic (kinda Ottomanish folks), yet the social benefits of claiming Judaism has prospered them. I feel like we’re fixin’ to go (((there))), and a hard stop needs to be brought.
that may be, but I don’t think they would release child porn for public view as that is a crime, I believe the other theory that there is video of a conf. call with Bill Hill and Ms Lynch on the tarmac offering a supreme court seat for making the email case go away. Still an obvious crime but also safe for public consumption....
I want that on a t-shirt.
I don’t have the feeling that the video is about Hillary and a child. I think it is videos of her committing treason outright plotting with the world banks and leaders to bring America to it’s knees. To dissolve America. That may upset some policemen to want to cry.
“What do you mean by “24 hours to respond to receivership”? Twitter connected? I don’t see your post 50, not on this thread anyway.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sorry... I believe at the time I meant to write “ my post ‘350’”
I was very excited at my first reading of that Q Drop. Without complete data, I submit that my reading interpretation regarding a receivership for twitter from what was posted by Q was plausible.
HOWEVER
To any and all, who may be nervous about inaccurate guesses being posted, let it be known that I regret it..... FWIW however, I was under the impression that we were gathered here to freewheel in bouncing our ideas around.
The error appeared to happen this way:
I was reading what an anon had guessed about a receivership for twitter, but zzeeman in particular has persuaded me, due to the context of dialog on 8 chan, that the probability is that what Q meant was that Snowden was given 24 hours to respond. I’m not sure how twitter enters in, unless it is a twitter expected from Snowden by Q people, or has actually been given by Snowden to Q.
I apologize for the confusion - but in the heat of battle, yes confusion will happen. Be assured I’m doing my best to step aside from creating further confusion.
If the above mea culpa doesn’t do it for someone, you are welcome to come over and help Darlin build the doghouse planned for me.
My first thought was going and having business cards printed up...
This just seemed cheap and simple and I can tweak it here or there...
I did one on the lid of the pull out drawer when I paid for the gas at the station attendant and a few around at the grocery store... I liked this in the men’s room because I wont (Hopefully) be on camera doing it.
I was sitting at a stop light on the way home thinking the back bumpers of cars would make a place for some rolling ones...
Yea, but it wasn't thrown around "willy nilly." It was tossed out there by ONE anon and immediately corrected by Q. HE responded in 24 HOURS not DAYS like the anon theorized.
Remove the term "receivership" from your brain pan, Jocko. These are not the drones you're looking for.
Thank you for instructions.
With a video chat on his twitter account. Go there to see
I don’t expect them to release child porn for public viewing officially. Unofficially, probably not either, though it is possible.
It’s more likely that they have the goods on her for some of her other illegal and nefarious activities. Video for that would be fair game.
The child porn angle would work in the court of law, of course, but in the court of public opinion, it’s not an option. And public opinion needs to be swayed somewhat, given how many brain-dead lefties there are out there thinking that Hillary is actually OK.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.