Posted on 01/12/2018 11:43:02 AM PST by Red Badger
Boeing showed off a scaled concept model of its hypersonic strike and reconnaissance aircraft design.
This week Boeing revealed the first design details of a demonstrator aircraft that would go faster than Mach 5. Boeing hopes to build the hypersonic concept around a combined-cycle engine that incorporates elements of a turbine and a dual ramjet/scramjet. The unveiling came at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics SciTech forum in Orlando, Florida, as reported by Aviation Week Aerospace Daily.
Boeing's model design is similar to one Lockheed Martin is working on. The aerospace industry right now is racing to produce a hypersonic strike and reconnaissance aircraft to replace the famed SR-71 Blackbird.
The design is an early concept that's not yet approved by Boeing for full-scale development. But the model, which shows a twin-tail, highly swept delta wing configuration, represents a feasible hypersonic design, Boeing's head of hypersonic research told Aviation Week Aerospace Daily:
“We asked, ‘What is the most affordable way to do a reusable hypersonic demonstrator vehicle?’ And we did our own independent research looking at this question,” says Kevin Bowcutt, Boeing chief scientist for hypersonics. If the concept is selected for full-scale development, Boeing envisions a two-step process beginning with flight tests of an F-16-sized, single-engine proof-of-concept precursor vehicle leading to a twin-engine, full-scale operational vehicle with about the same dimensions as the 107-ft.-long SR-71.
Boeing will expand on research from its past X-43 and X-51 Waverider experimental aircraft, which were tests of unmanned hypersonic planes, as the company refines a new aircraft design. The X-51 broke the record for sustained air-breathing hypersonic flight when it flew at Mach 5.1 for three and a half minutes before running out of fuel and crashing into the Pacific Ocean on May 1, 2013.
The big difference is that the X-51 was a small test vehicle dropped from a B-52 Stratofortress. It used a rocket booster to achieve Mach 4.8, then jettisoned the booster and used a scramjet to top Mach 5. A hypersonic replacement for the SR-71 would need to take off under its own power, accelerate through Mach 1 and up to above Mach 5, and then slow back down and land, a much more difficult challenge.
To tackle this problem, Boeing and Lockheed Martin are studying turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engines along with Orbital ATK and Aerojet Rocketdyne, respectively. A TBCC engine would use a conventional turbojet to achieve speeds up to about Mach 3, the limit for a turbojet, and then transition to a dual ramjet/scramjet, which must be traveling at speeds over Mach 3 to work properly, compressing air from the intake to achieve combustion without an axial compressor. The ramjet/scramjet would then carry an aircraft to speeds over Mach 5. The plane would need to transition back to to the turbojet to slow down and land.
Boeing's project for a "son-of-Blackbird" hypersonic strike and reconnaissance aircraft is in its very early days. Meanwhile, a demonstrator for Lockheed Martin's design was possibly spotted in Palmdale, California, near the Air Force plant where Lockheed's Skunk Works operates. Work on a TBCC engine, funded under DARPA's Advanced Full Range Engine (AFRE) program as well as by NASA and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, is also still in the early stages.
It is difficult to put a timeline on the research or the potential flight tests, though Lockheed reportedly hopes to fly a single-engine scaled demonstrator known as the flight research vehicle (FRV) in the 2020s. One has to imagine Boeing wants to match Lockheed Martin's development schedule, if not surpass it.
Went to the Smithsonian once with my parents back in the day. I was real young. They got into a fight and mom took me home... I remember crying thinking to myself...why make me leave?
....is dead!
I saw them all the time at Kadena.
Funny how certain planes evoke a certain ... emotion.
Calling the SR-71 or B-70 sexy,
Just seems to fit.
All the lines just “look” right.
No, That’s John and George................
You know where I would love to go is one of those bone yards for old planes they have row and row of planes.
I’ve not seen that in my research. Do you have a link?
;)
Nice...thank you!
Was stationed at Beale AFB, CA 81-84. Worked in the weather station.
SR-71 flights twice a week, at least. Magnificent to watch those 4 AM takeoffs. Wake-up call for the base housing area.
AFAIK, the true, classified "operational altitude" of the RB-57F (with the supplemental Pratt & Whitney J60-P-9 turbojets mounted) has never been declassified and published...
In 1969 I was working for Hughes Aircraft Company and they had a YF-12 (is that the same as A-12?)bailed to them to test the AIM-47 missile. I got to sit in the back seat (not fly, just look). NASA had a couple at the time and crashed one so they took the one Hughes had.
No problem figured one might be within a days drive and you could take that off the bucket list
Always regretted not taking my son out of school, dropping him off at the Museum, and then letting him be my museum "guide" when I finished with my AFML meeting...
So -- when he PCS'd from the 101st Airborne at Ft. Campbell, we drove back to MA together in his off-road pickup. We had a ball stopping at archaeological and historical battleground sites -- and spending a whole day together at the USAF Museum. Best father-son outing -- ever!!
And -- yes -- I did reach out and touch the leading edge of the SR-71's wing... '-)
You can pat them on the nose is selected museums. They are so wonderfully pretty.
Too bad they couldn’t get the entire B-36 inside the building... :-(
I saw the video of his crash...
Just think... The B-70 had six of what the SR-71 had but two. The same engines. Staggers the imagination.
I knew an old guy who flew bombers in WWII and finally retired in the 70s. One of the planes he flew was the B-36.
After he retired he worked as an instructor pilot at Ft. Rucker. He said when they interviewed him, he was asked if he was qualified for two engines. He replied that he was qualified for 10.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.