Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To all those who are lawyers, and those who understand law talk.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0872/Sections/0872.02.html ^

Posted on 08/29/2017 6:44:26 PM PDT by manc

Does this mean in Florida towns cannot take down monuments, or tombs down, remove, or destroy?http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0872/Sections/0872.02.html


TOPICS: Education; History; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 08/29/2017 6:44:26 PM PDT by manc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: manc

Can a lawyer, or a budding lawyer understand this law, and tell me if the a city, or town cannot remove a monument because of this statue.


2 posted on 08/29/2017 6:45:41 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

The law is “whatever”.


3 posted on 08/29/2017 6:52:10 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I agree, but in our town we are having this debate , because an outside pastor bused other blacks in crying they are afraid of the monuments, and then there was a commie women march group


4 posted on 08/29/2017 6:53:22 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: manc

This has nothing to do w/statues like antifa is tearing down.

These are “monuments” erected at grave sites as in cemeteries. Not the type of things you have in public squares.


5 posted on 08/29/2017 6:53:27 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

6 posted on 08/29/2017 6:53:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

I am not admitted in Florida, but “or other structure or thing placed or designed for a memorial of the dead” is rather clear language.

But defense counsel would object the statute was only designed to protect cemeteries, not general memorial statues such as found in public parks where the person so memorialized is not interred.

Think statute would get the State an indictment, but would fail on a judges interpretation of legislative intent, of which I would agree.

Don’t like it, but there it is.


7 posted on 08/29/2017 6:54:19 PM PDT by Strac6 ("Mrs. Strac, Pilatus, and Sig Sauer: All the fun things in my life are Swiss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: manc

There’s law in this country?


8 posted on 08/29/2017 6:54:21 PM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

This applies to monuments or markers that have human remains in or under them. However, if you go through the proper channels, you can get permission (after giving public notice and looking for heirs) to move them. So it’s not much protection even for monuments that have human remains, unless some loony decides not to wait for the City Commission to approve it and just tries to dig it up on his own. That’s illegal, but going through the channels to remove them isn’t.

We have a monument in my town that they want to remove because the person whose ashes are under the marker was a Confederate General, among many other things. The other is a monument to the dead from this town, all of them old family names of families that are still here, with nary a Confederate symbol on it. But a local minister is claiming that he’s intimidated by it every time he sees it, so I’m afraid its end is nigh.


9 posted on 08/29/2017 6:56:17 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: manc

Doesn’t mean a thing Nothing. Laws have ceased to mean anything.

We are at the mercy of black-robed egoists for whom the only ‘law’ is their subjective sense of an ideal outcome.


10 posted on 08/29/2017 6:56:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

One of the monuments has a Generals ashes underneath it, so would that be classed as a grave, tomb etc?

Just looking at what ever to stop these monuments, and I am not expert in lawyer, legal talk so any help is appreciated please.


11 posted on 08/29/2017 6:57:11 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Check this one out:

18 U.S. Code § 1369 - Destruction of veterans’ memorials
US Code

(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (b), willfully injures or destroys, or attempts to injure or destroy, any structure, plaque, statue, or other monument on public property commemorating the service of any person or persons in the armed forces of the United States shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(b) A circumstance described in this subsection is that—

(1) in committing the offense described in subsection (a), the defendant travels or causes another to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses the mail or an instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce; or

(2) the structure, plaque, statue, or other monument described in subsection (a) is located on property owned by, or under the jurisdiction of, the Federal Government.


12 posted on 08/29/2017 6:58:05 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: manc
The heading is specific to graves and dead bodies. Unless a monument or statue is specifically related to a dead body or a grave, the statute has no impact on whether or not it is removed, defaced, or damaged. This protects the gravestones, statues in cemeteries, statues in and on tombs, etc. It will not protect monuments in parks, public squares, memorials even if the person is dead, or somewhere in the vicinity unless that statue is in the cemetery where the body is buried. Then, it probably needs to be in close proximity to the grave.

It still won't stop ANTIFA and BLM from desecrating graves but it gives one a tool to prosecute after they destroy them.

13 posted on 08/29/2017 6:58:09 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... bet if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

Are yo in St Augustine where I am talking about? If so then the pastor is form Gainesvile, but come here at the weekend to go to his church.
I went to the pastors church last week where he did not allow us t talk, and then went to the town hall meeting but could not stay to speak .


14 posted on 08/29/2017 6:59:57 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: manc

The way I read it, this statute refers to graves and grave monuments and decorations. It does not apply to civic monuments. So, if Grants Tomb was in Florida it would be illegal to defile it but a statue of Grant in a town square would not be covered by that law.


15 posted on 08/29/2017 7:01:47 PM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Yes.


16 posted on 08/29/2017 7:03:13 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: manc

A little off topic but still about Florida laws.

The FHP supervisor who wrote the memo telling State Troopers to write two tickets per hour and then claimed that was not a quota resigned today.

You can’t just say something does not violate the law, then violate it. Florida law specifically bans quotas.


17 posted on 08/29/2017 7:03:20 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Thanks to all


18 posted on 08/29/2017 7:08:34 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: manc

Just think that this country acted appalled when the Taliban went on their destroy everything spree. Maybe a sizeable portion of America had no problem with it. ISIS started doing the same thing and there was very little outrage and it was suppressed by the media. It just took a pathetic excuse to release the inner Taliban in the leftist scum though. There is no end in sight and the best possible outcome is that this madness burns itself out. Worthless Government,Tyrannical Judges and Eunuch Law Enforcement refuse to stop it.


19 posted on 08/29/2017 7:11:19 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

No difference between ISIS, Taliban destroying monuments than these left wing nuts destroying monuments.


20 posted on 08/29/2017 7:13:18 PM PDT by manc ( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson