Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Needn't Get A Patient's Consent To Study Blood Or DNA
National Public Radio ^ | 18 Jan, 2017 | ROB STEIN

Posted on 01/19/2017 6:48:39 PM PST by MtnClimber

The Obama administration has dropped a controversial proposal that would have required all federally funded scientists to get permission from patients before using their cells, blood, tissue or DNA for research.

The proposal was eliminated from the final revision of the Common Rule, which was published in the Federal Register Wednesday. The rule is a complex set of regulations designed to make sure federally funded research on human subjects is conducted ethically. The revision to the regulations, set to go into effect in 2018, marks the first time the rule has been updated in 26 years.

The initial proposal that researchers be required to get permission before using a patient's tissue sample for research came out of the desire to avoid repeating what happened to Henrietta Lacks, an American who died of cervical cancer in 1951. Some of the cells from Lacks' cancer were kept alive for decades, used in research and for commercial purposes without her consent or her family's knowledge.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: blood; cancer; control; dna; henriettalacks; obamasfault; permission; privacy; research; stolendna

1 posted on 01/19/2017 6:48:39 PM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Great move, 0bama! Right when Oprah is making a movie about Henrietta Lacks...a BLACK woman whose DNA was STOLEN without her consent.

What a @#$%^&*! PUTZ!

OK. Calm down, Diana. Just a few more hours to go...

*BREATHE* *BREATHE* *BREATHE*


2 posted on 01/19/2017 6:52:07 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

If this is used on leftists we can examine their detached heads to determine their hatred disorder.


3 posted on 01/19/2017 6:53:17 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

You can try, but liberal skulls tend to already be void of any gray matter.


4 posted on 01/19/2017 7:06:08 PM PST by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

ping


5 posted on 01/19/2017 7:07:57 PM PST by ColdOne (( I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

This will have no effect when a permanent ban on federal funding of scientists is placed, shortly after Trump takes office.


6 posted on 01/19/2017 7:30:53 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber; All

Patriots are reminded that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to tax and spend to study any citizen’s blood or DNA, with or without a citizen’s consent.

Corrections, insights welcome.


7 posted on 01/19/2017 7:44:11 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson