Skip to comments.
Austin American-Statesman won't allow any more comments posted on Hillary collapsing story. Hmmm???
The Austin American-Statesman ^
| 11 September 2016
| Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin
Posted on 09/11/2016 6:02:22 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The Statesman will not allow additional comments on Hillary's collapse story.
See here: Click here.
(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clinton; collapse; comments; hillary; media; mediabias; msm; statesman; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Wow. Wouldn't let me post a comment.
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
It’s this and the other story about a Hillary replacement that make this more than what they would like you to think. I bet the Hillary people are demanding no more discussion about this.
2
posted on
09/11/2016 6:04:32 PM PDT
by
hsmomx3
(AZ for Trump!!)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Hitlery is teetering. Give her a push and over she goes.
3
posted on
09/11/2016 6:05:21 PM PDT
by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
To: hsmomx3
Check and see if it blocks you from posting a comment please.
4
posted on
09/11/2016 6:05:33 PM PDT
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Because people can be nasty and gleeful about their political opponents.
5
posted on
09/11/2016 6:05:52 PM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin; vette6387; HarleyLady27; Doogle; NFHale; mazda77; SkyPilot; radu; ...
Freedom of Speech isn’t for the Deplorables, ya think?
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I’ve noticed a lot of papers and other news outlets have eliminated comments altogether. I read that a study showed that the comments section was more influential than people thought, and because comments on certain stories brought a lot of comments, they have moved to eliminate that source of opposition to their agenda.
7
posted on
09/11/2016 6:10:25 PM PDT
by
euram
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Why would a Clinton fan rag want to take the risk?
8
posted on
09/11/2016 6:10:38 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
First they came for the Deplorables
but I am not a.........wait I am. Damn!
9
posted on
09/11/2016 6:12:19 PM PDT
by
joshua c
(Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Who cares?
It's a crappy liberal sycophantic Hillary-worshiping rag.
Not fit for the outhouse.
10
posted on
09/11/2016 6:12:19 PM PDT
by
OldSmaj
(Voting for Hillary because she is a woman is like eating a turd because it looks like a Baby Ruth.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
How about the Butcher of Benghazi collapses on the anniversary of the attack.
That doesn't mention Hillary
11
posted on
09/11/2016 6:13:10 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
All the page does is spin and spin and will not post my simple statement which was not negative at all.
12
posted on
09/11/2016 6:13:41 PM PDT
by
hsmomx3
(AZ for Trump!!)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
post it on completely unrelated stories, especially sports and weather!
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Well you have to register, and I’m not registering to that rag.
14
posted on
09/11/2016 6:16:42 PM PDT
by
38special
(For real, y'all.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
No freedom of speech with the Austin American-Statesman. Now it this was about Donald Trump there would not be a problem.
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
16
posted on
09/11/2016 6:18:21 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
(Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
To: joshua c
but I am not a.........wait I am. Damn! It is a big basket.....
17
posted on
09/11/2016 6:19:20 PM PDT
by
hadaclueonce
(This time I am Deplorable)
To: joshua c
tooo funny...
18
posted on
09/11/2016 6:28:32 PM PDT
by
Chode
(You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING!)
To: euram
About time Gannett went AR on sites quoting them, somebody had posted a reference to a "letter to the editor" purporting to be local to that Gannett rag, I notice basically the same letter in my own local Gannett rag with a local address.
I think they were salting their editorial "responses" all across the chain at the same time, and people were catching on.
I'm not surprised *everybody* is trying to control the information flow that isn't what they want to hear.
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The are panicking that’s why.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
