The entitlement is to a “fair AND SPEEDY” trial. Shooting on sight gets him at least 50% of his rights. That seems to be more than they want to give us, don’t you think?
Self defense is racist
The person being killed is denied their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Those 3 rights trump the 1 right to a trail.
The attacker has voluntarily nullified his rights the moment the attack begins by virtue of the attempt to infringe upon and/or deny the attacked person’s rights.
Your right to swing your fist ends just before you make contact with any part of my body.
To even engage in a discussion with Justin Curmi about this would be a form of perverted mental masturbation of the absurd. His contention is insane and any consideration of it legitimizes him even more.
If you do indeed shoot someone, make sure it is a legal self defence and shoot to kill.
Avoid being sued for damages or injuries.
So what this guy is essentially saying is that his right to a trial is more important than my life, because if he is willing to break into my home, he may be willing to take my life.
One can only hope that brian anderson or a family member is violently accosted and we will see a change in him and if we dont he is mentally ill
Rights are balanced against each other not equal.
E.g., you can’t deny my right to shoot somebody because it denies my free speech - I am expressing my displeasure with them.
In that case, the victim’s life is more important than your speech. If you don’t believe that, shoot somebody you don’t like and see what happens.
What I missed in those debates is that the Bill of Rights is what the government cannot take from you. It dies not govern the conduct of individuals. If you’re in my home, I have every right to not respect your rights. If I’m in your home, you can do the same to me.
The Left never defines the term, 'justice.' If they did, their irrational, bumper-sticker fallacies would disintegrate. The ambiguity surrounding their use of 'justice' lets them get away with an assortment of dangerous fuzzy ideas, such as social justice, environmental justice, racial justice, . . .
OTOH, we conservatives should regard justice as compliance with Natural Law, the Law of Reason, meaning "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
Armed with truth, we can slap Leftists down every time.
Philosophically a criminal is not responsible for his actions because society caused him to be a criminal and his acts are irrational i.e. he can't help it. One who defends himself from the criminal is a rational actor because it is rational to not want to be robbed, hurt, or killed. Thus self defense is a considered rational act and is deliberate inflicted harm to the assailant making it the greater or the only crime.
This has to be satire...right?
More progressive idiocy. After you’re dead you can shoot back.
More progressive idiocy. After you’re dead you can shoot back.
Yep - far more fair to allow yourself to be killed so the bad guy gets treated fairly...wonder how they would put it into practice under real world conditions....
I leave judgement to God. Arranging the meeting only expedites justice
But denies you the right to Life, Liberty, an Pursuit of Happiness Dummo!
Abortion is illegal because it denies the baby the right to a fair trial.