Posted on 04/07/2016 10:25:53 PM PDT by Trump20162020
It just doesn’t matter. PaulRyan’s first campaign ad.
And it is getting comments.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/04/07/campaign-ad-new-paul-ryan-video-raises-questions/
The big difference between Cruz and Reagan is that Reagan was inspiring. Cruz is not inspiring in the least.
The real reason why Cruz didn't get to 50% in Texas is that people don't like him. In other words, he is an asshole.
Cruz Should Drop Out Since He Got Only 43.8% in Texas!
Opinion ^ | 8 Apr 16 | Xzins
Posted on 4/8/2016, 6:26:29 AM by xzins
Sometimes it is amazing what comes out of the mouthpiece of a campaign.
Ted Cruz’s challenged campaign manager is proclaiming that Trump should drop out if he cannot get over 50% in New York.
In that case, Cruz should drop out because he only got 43.8% in Texas. The opposition vote in Texas was 27% for Trump, but then 18, 4, and 4, for Rubio, Kasich, and Carson respectively. IOW, a non-Trump vote of only 26%.
Kasich is running second in New York, and Cruz had 18% at last count, well below the non-Trump vote in Texas of 26%. In fact, Cruz is in danger of scoring zero chance at any delegates in New York since there is a 20% lower threshold.
So, to wrap this up, if Cruz cannot get any delegates, and cannot beat Trump’s 27% from Texas, then CRUZ should drop out.
Not Trump.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3418760/posts
That line seems to be used a lot in defense of Cruz "but it didn’t come from Cruz, it came from ____________"
For example:
Cruz didn't say that Carson quit the race in Iowa, it came from _________
Cruz didn't run that ad about Trump's wife, it came from ____________
....
Cruz’s Harvard arrogance won’t let him quit.
Jeb Bush
Ben Carson
Chris Christie
Ted Cruz
Carly Fiorina
Elizabeth Gray
Lindsey Graham
Mike Huckabee
John Kasich
Rand Paul
Marco Rubio
Rick Santorum
Donald Trump
You left out Jim Gilmore, and I never heard anything about Elizabeth Gray.
The Canadian narcissist is insane. The front runner should drop out just to make way for Number Two? The man needs a PET scan to determine what’s going on up there in his noggin.
Why don’t you tell the class all about the “conservatism” of Trump insiders Roy Cohn and Roger Stone?
“In 1996, Stone resigned from a post as a volunteer spokesman in Senator Bob Dole’s campaign for president after The National Enquirer wrote that Stone had placed ads and pictures in racy swingers publications and a website seeking sexual partners for himself and his second wife, Nydia Bertrane Stone”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Stone
And of his "good friend" Jeff Epstein?
You seem to be getting a little ahead of yourself, like myself what are you offering other than your “opinion”? Maybe to yourself your “opinion” has no more validity than my “opinion” but that’s not the way i’m seeing it. Try this one on for size, your opinion has no more validity to it than my opinion until future events occur at which time will will be able to determine who’s prone to insane delusions. .........fair enough?
Did Cruz answer the ads?
You do know that your links do not go to the correct vote. But that was told to you before, you just failed to listen.
Did Cruz answer the ads?
Stone was for many years a lobbyist for Donald Trump on behalf of his casino business [23] and was also involved in opposing expanded casino gambling in New York State, a position that brought him into conflict with Governor George Pataki.[24]"
...
Stone served as an advisor to the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.[45] He left the campaign on August 8, 2015.[46]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Stone
Maybe you should ask "outsider' Trump if he did?
Nice comments. Thank you.
Your conclusion is unavoidable.
Maybe you should reconsider who you think is “your guy”. Join the Americans.
Tyypical, again in your zeal to attack, you misread the gist of the post...like yesterday when you put out mis- information.
Slyfox was stating that Cruz did well to receive 43% because all names were on the ballot. Not because of the number running...The number of people on the ballot does not change...that was my point.
Please explain your math on this?
Getting 44% in a five man race is like getting 74% in a three man race.
In fairness, I happened to access two sources that led me to believe fewer people were on the ballot in Texas.
There were 14.
This post was presented to clarify the issue.
My initial response what that Cruz didn’t only get 43.8% because of a large field, 12 plus. He only had five serious challengers.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3418683/posts?page=74#74
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.