Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Your First Look at the Pentagon’s New Unmanned Sub Chaser. (VIDEO)
GCAPTAIN ^ | 160331 | Mike Schuler

Posted on 04/03/2016 12:06:52 PM PDT by golux

The U.S. Department of Defense has released the first footage of its prototype unmanned anti-submarine ship being developed to track quiet diesel-electric submarines over long distances.

The new vessel was launched in January at Vigor’s shipyard in Portland, Oregon, where it has quietly been under construction for the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

During a speed tests in February, the vessel reached a top speed of 27 knots.... (snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: chaser; darpa; navy; submarine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
...And the lass that loved an unmanned ship-like waterborne autonomous drone unit.
1 posted on 04/03/2016 12:06:52 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: golux

Old Alpha Male Sperm Whales are not going to like it.


2 posted on 04/03/2016 12:11:30 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux

This sounds like a convenient target drone ship for the “enemy” submarines. Torpedo practice!


3 posted on 04/03/2016 12:11:31 PM PDT by Rio (Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux

Seen it month ago here or at FA.


4 posted on 04/03/2016 12:11:42 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux

One ugly ship. Unmanned you would think it did not look so convential.


5 posted on 04/03/2016 12:16:26 PM PDT by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bailee

I assume they have given the ship the option of being manned by a crew. That may explain the conventional appurtenances.


6 posted on 04/03/2016 12:19:49 PM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bailee
One ugly ship. Unmanned you would think it did not look so convential.

You want beautiful? Give the contract to Lockheed-Martin.

7 posted on 04/03/2016 12:28:47 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PTBAA

Sooner or later someone is going to have to ‘tap’ on the fratzenjammer controllers to get the do-widget to work right.


8 posted on 04/03/2016 12:31:30 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: golux

Unmanned, but it appears to have a bridge with a door and windows.


9 posted on 04/03/2016 12:31:36 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux
A drone submarine controlled by AI and pre-programed actions, is a really bad idea.

Out of the gate.

Any successful employment of them would necessitate them making decision for months on end without direction or correction.

There is no way to communicate effectively with a sub at -2000 meters. And if it rises to 150ft to put out a long wire it's likely to lose contact with it's target.

10 posted on 04/03/2016 12:45:44 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux


11 posted on 04/03/2016 12:54:19 PM PDT by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“A drone submarine controlled by AI and pre-programed actions, is a really bad idea.”

Uh, it is NOT a submarine.


12 posted on 04/03/2016 1:08:54 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Uh, check the link, indeed its a surface vessel and a submarine.


13 posted on 04/03/2016 1:23:28 PM PDT by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: umgud

it’s missing screen doors.


14 posted on 04/03/2016 1:25:30 PM PDT by brivette (no tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rustybucket

“Uh, check the link, indeed its a surface vessel and a submarine.”

Time for your eye-doctor appointment ...


15 posted on 04/03/2016 1:33:57 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
There is no way to communicate effectively with a sub at -2000 meters. And if it rises to 150ft to put out a long wire it's likely to lose contact with it's target.

Wouldn't communications depend on data rate and transmission frequency? I would expect ELF to reach deep from land-based transmission sites but with a low data rate, and sound to reach deep at a higher data rate from the surface ship.

16 posted on 04/03/2016 1:35:52 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: golux

EVERYTHING IS STUPID!


17 posted on 04/03/2016 1:39:11 PM PDT by Lazamataz (When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux

Anything to make this country stronger militarily, in spite of Obama.


18 posted on 04/03/2016 1:41:32 PM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golux
unmanned ship

So what's to stop the enemy from surfacing and manning it? or at least unplugging it.

19 posted on 04/03/2016 1:52:08 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug

“So what’s to stop the enemy from surfacing and manning it? or at least unplugging it. “

Self-destruct button?


20 posted on 04/03/2016 2:34:27 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson