Study: Bagels linked to increased risk of lung cancer (U of TX)

WFLD, Fox 32, Chicago ^ | Mar 09 2016

[Olog-hai]

This will make you stop spreading the cream cheese and toss that bagel away.

A study says the carbs in bagels can raise your risk for lung cancer.

The University of Texas study says high glycemic diets raise the risk of lung cancer by 49 percent, even for people who never smoked. …

[verga]

Back atttcha

[Gamecock]

Translation: When Catholics leave the RF they turn their piety off.

[ealgeone]

there's MORE THAN one NARROW MINDED ANTI-catholic BIGOTwho likes to post a lot of stuff but will not answer a question when confronted with the Word.

Congratulations...you're an Alinskiite now.

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

Again...as if exposing the false teachings of roman catholicism is bigotry and narrow minded.

Better watch out...those pigeons are circling.

[verga]

If you stop saying stupid things I won’t have to keep embarrassing you.

[Elsie]

Of courses the truth is that when you all attack on mass, don't be surprised when we don't sit still and take your abuse.

Trump is a GREAT teacher!

Matthew 5:39
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

[Elsie]

If Rome would stop saying un-Biblical things about what GOD requires; then I will stop saying Scriptural things about what He does.

[Smokin' Joe]

...sugar, fat, salt, caffeine...

Four of the main food groups.

[verga]

But Cruz is actually a Conservative.

[Elsie]

I’ve heard that.

[metmom]

And I repeat, only the methods have changed.

[metmom]

If that don't work; they try Private Reply

They do that too. You wouldn't believe some of the PM's I get from them. And I know I'm not the only one.

[metmom]

As the mod has said if you are that thin skinned maybe you should stick to the RF where your sensibilities will be protected.

Wrong again. You are misrepresenting what the RM has said.

What the RM has said is that if you're thin skinned to stick to CAUCUS or other similarly restricted threads.

Here, documentation from the RM.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3294020/posts?page=98#98

Open threads are in a town square format.

Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected

Posters may argue for or against beliefs, deities, religious authorities, etc. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule. “Open” RF debate is often contentious.

It requires thick skin. A poster must be able to make his points while standing his ground, suffering adverse remarks about his beliefs - or letting them roll off his back.

Members of religions which are as much culture as belief sometimes take religious debate personally. If you keep getting your feelings hurt because other posters ridicule or disapprove or hate what you hold dear, then you are too thin-skinned to be involved in “open” RF debate. You should IGNORE “open” RF threads altogether and instead post to RF threads labeled “prayer” “devotional” “caucus” or “ecumenical.”

[metmom]

Judging by the number of posts they have deleted there, it’s usually off anyways.

[metmom]

Hey, you forgot chocolate.

[Smokin' Joe]

Hey, you forgot chocolate.

OMG! And BACON!

my bad.

[metmom]

They can replace the salt, fat, and sugar.

That still leaves one open then.

So now it’s caffeine, bacon, and chocolate.

What are we missing? There’s room for one more.

[Smokin' Joe]

Tobacco! (That’d frost their cookies!)

[HossB86]

Now I know so.

Hoss

[verga]

And it applies equally well to any type of thread, but apparently you are not bright enough to understand or be able to transfer knowledge. Keep talking and embarrassing yourself.

[Gamecock]

Nice Christ like behavior you have there!