Posted on 02/29/2016 11:55:17 AM PST by pilgrim
The New Deal’s executor held many positions similar to those of to one Donald J. Trump. ________________________________________________
Imagine a U.S. president who is bombastic, egotistical, and just a little racist. He worries opening the borders will mean an influx of undesirables. He implements capricious executive orders, and seems more concerned with his own power than with the Constitution. He’s often called a fascist by people who know what the term means.
No, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Debate raged last December about whether President Trump would be a fascist. Steve Horwitz and Martin O’Malley, among others, claimed he would be. Not so fast, said Megan McArdle at Bloomberg View. A fascist president could never take power in America, McArdle argues, because, among other things, “America has neither the weak institutions nor the revolutionary organizations necessary for a Trump Reich to fester.”
But that’s not quite true. FDR may not have been Hitler or Mussolini. But the difference was one of degree, not of kind. And now Trump is following in his footsteps. Suspicious of Americans, Immigrants, and Refugees
FDR spied on political dissidents in the name of national security. In May 1940, he warned of a “fifth column” in America (a military term for civilian rebels), and claimed refugees might be enemy agents.
In “FDR Goes to War,” noted historians Burton and Anita Folsom tell the story of how FDR used the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and attorney general to go after his political enemies. He wiretapped phones, ordered tax audits of dissidents, and created a personal spy group to collect incriminating information about political rivals.
All of this was before FDR rounded up almost 122,000 Japanese-Americans and forced them into internment camps. While national security concerns were cited, FDR also considered Asians biologically untrustworthy.
FDR was also hostile towards refugees. When Jews sought to escape from Nazi Germany, FDR barred the gates. The State Department cut refugee immigration by 75 percent by imposing burdensome regulations. FDR defended his actions on the grounds that “among the refugees there are some spies….” But as with the internment camps, a darker motive also played in: FDR was an anti-Semite who waved away pleas to let in Jewish refugees as “Jewish wailing.”
This isn’t to suggest that all opposition to immigration is fascist. Many reasonable Americans favor immigration restrictions. But FDR’s immigration ideas, summed up in his claim that immigrants ought to have “blood of the right sort,” were clearly prejudicial. So is Trump’s rhetoric about Mexicans. The New Deal’s Not So Different from Fascism
Economically too, FDR’s ideology closely resembled the fascist policies of Mussolini’s Italy. With the creation of the National Recovery Association (NRA), FDR set up a system that pushed each industry into a cartel that cooperated with the federal government to set wages, prices, and “fair practices.” One NRA report even stated directly, “The Fascist Principles are very similar to those we have been evolving here in America.”
This similarity was not accidental. Rexford Tugwell, one of the architects of the New Deal, wrote that Mussolini had done “many of the things which seem to me necessary.”
Roosevelt said he was “deeply impressed by what [Mussolini] has accomplished.” Mussolini returned the favor in his review of FDR’s 1933 book “Looking Forward,” noting that, “Reminiscent of Fascism is (FDR’s) principle that the state no longer leaves the economy to its own devices.”
Like Trump, FDR had little respect for the separation of powers. When he tried to pass a 99.5 percent marginal tax rate on income above $100,000, Congress rebuffed him. So he issued an executive order mandating a 100 percent marginal tax rate, and lowered the ceiling to incomes of $25,000 per year (which Congress later rescinded). His attempt to do a similar end-run around the Supreme Court, the court-packing scheme, is infamous.
Paul Warburg, one of FDR’s first-term advisors, claimed, “I believe that Mr. Roosevelt is so charmed with the fun of brandishing the band leader’s baton at the head of the parade, so pleased with the picture he sees of himself, that he is no longer capable of recognizing that the human power to lead is limited.” FDR saw himself as a benevolent dictator, and his actions reflect that grandiosity. Trump has made a campaign of this same sort of grandiosity.
It’s true that FDR didn’t take total power in the United States, and that U.S. institutions prevented him from doing so. The Supreme Court struck down his ideas, especially before 1937. When he tried to pack the court with allies, the public rallied against him. Congress also refused to pass certain laws on his agenda. The Dictatorial Type Keeps Resurfacing
But FDR was both powerful and destructive. He was not Mussolini, but he ran roughshod over the rule of law, and dramatically transformed American politics—which should serve as an example of what a Trump presidency might look like.
In fact, a Trump presidency could be even more dangerous, because the powers of the presidency have expanded. The White House can place citizens on terrorist watch lists—spying on them and preventing them from flying. The president can order U.S. citizens who are abroad, like Anwar Al-Awlaki, to be assassinated without a trial. The National Security Agency allows the president to spy on political dissidents such as Faisal Gill (a Muslim Republican) and Nihad Awab (director of a Muslim civil rights organization), or even to wiretap news outlets like the Associated Press.
This doesn’t mean a Trump presidency would lead to brown shirts on the street. But there is more to fascism than goose-stepping and military style uniforms, and Trump, like FDR, displays many such characteristics. So when people look at Trump’s agenda and claim “it can’t happen here,” they’re ignoring history that’s not even a century old. Not only could such things happen, they already have.
The only sure way to guard against Trump is to roll back the enormous power of the government that he would be managing. History, even in the United States, shows that dangerous men dupe voters and take power. We should shrink government so that when they’re elected, they take as little power as possible.
Julian Adorney is a Young Voices Advocate. He has written for FEE, Townhall, The Hill, and Lawrence Read’s latest book “Excuse Me, Professor.”
The Federalist happens to be headed up by a CRuz BFF. No bias, there, pilgrim.
Have they written an article about any of the uncanny resemblances between CRuz and 0bama? First term Senators who run for Prez, etc?
Yes. My parents were ‘hornswoggled’ believers!
Best people I ever knew, at least my Father was and they could never admit FDR wasn’t who they thought he was.
I have read your post.
I read it in July, August, September, October, November, December, January, February... and by God, I am hoping not to see someone post it again in March.
It is over. Wake up.
Nobody is buying what you’re selling even here.
All you are doing is driving Cruz’s negatives through the roof.
85% of the public has rejected Ted. What, you folks won’t be happy until it’s 95%?
You’re going to get a lot of use out of that graphic, today.
Does spamming threads with cutie pie graphics give you satisfaction? I hope so. But, there is not a single word about Cruz in the posted essay.
It’s amazing and disheartening to see so many here abandon their reason and all historical perspective to empower this dangerous campaign.
There is still time to wake up and think this thing through.
Excuse me, that was the Republican public...
I plan on it!
With specificity, not generalizations, what is wrong?
That's all you got? Why not point out where the author is wrong. FR once actually rolled that way.
The only thing that FDR and Trump fear is fear itself.
I find that cartoon juvenile and offensive.
So you are pleased Trump takes these positions?:
“The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions.....I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun.”
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.102.
“I’m a conservative on most issues but a liberal on health. It is an unacceptable but accurate fact that the number of uninsured Americans has risen to 42 million. Working out detailed plans will take time. But the goal should be clear: Our people are our greatest asset. We must take care of our own. We must have universal healthcare. “
Source: The America We Deserve, by Donald Trump, p.206-208
“I’m “fine” with affirmative action.”
Source: Fox News Sunday 2015 Coverage of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Oct 18, 2015
“I can’t take Israel’s side.”
http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/dump-on-trump-night-debate-means-war-on-gop-kingpin/
“Donald Trump Thinks Kelo-Style Eminent Domain is ‘a wonderful thing”
http://reason.com/blog/2015/10/06/donald-trump-thinks-kelo-style-eminent-d
“Donald Trump pledges to curb press freedom through libel laws”
As the day progresses, you’re going to see a lot more of that graphic.
The absurd negative articles keep showing up, so I’m going to keep posting what I think the overall outcome is.
Cruz and his supporters won’t stop until he is rejected by over 90% of Republicans.
Being compared to Emperor For Life Great Depression Extending FDR isn’t exactly complimentary.
Yep, demagnetize America and they will leave.
You only read things in favor of Trump?
Seems like some cannot read the article and post their disagreement with the article.
Really had rather have a discussion re: the article.
Quote: “Note also political elections, and how easily debates can descend into name-calling from which there is no recovery.”
Take care......’Miss’ Jane
OK, so you are pro-gun control, anti-Israel, pro-universal health care, anti-1st Amendment, and pro Affirmative Action.
Sounds like Trump is your man.
![](http://i65.tinypic.com/fm14x3.jpg";)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.