Posted on 02/29/2016 4:26:12 AM PST by Kaslin
I disagree with those conservatives who say they will never, ever, ever, ever vote for Donald Trump should the GOP embrace his special brand of nonsense and nominate him, but I can't blame them. Hell, I'm about one more round of foolishness away from joining them.
But not quite yet. Trump is the lesser of the candidates, lesser of the conservatives, but also the lesser of the two ancient socialist evils that the Democrats are eenie meenie miney moeing between. At least Trump pretends to embrace capitalism, of a sort. And at least he doesn't seem to hate America, just those Americans who aren't awed by his magnificence.
He's no conservative, that's clear. Trump merely mouths conservative ideas, though to characterize them as "ideas" gives them credit for a thoughtfulness and ideological rigor entirely absent from his experience. But Trump is canny enough to know his audience, and he knows what sells -God, guns, and the glory of the good old U.S. of A. And I like all those things. Perhaps he will continue to find supporting those things useful in the future, meaning that with Trump, at least there's a chance we'll be able to protect these things. But Der Crusty Commissar and the Bar-exam-flunking, pervert-enabling, pantsuited, liberal fascist harridan are actively against those things and everything else good about America. So Trump is marginally better only because he's marginally less likely to turn us into a less tropical version of Venezuela.
Yippee. Can you feel the burn?
It goes without saying that the establishment burned us good by ignoring, when not actively lying to, the same folks Trump has now enlisted. Sure, Trump has attracted some cretins, racists and nimrods, though I'll put his bad apple creepy hangers-on up against Sanders's Occupier freaks any day in a Battle of the Political Fringies for the Worst People Ever trophy. But most of his followers are just regular Americans who are tired of seeing the country they spent their lives building, feeding, defending, and loving stolen from them by weirdos, losers and gender-fluid mutations.
They are sick of being told what to do, what to think and what to feel - and to shut-up. It's not only by the left but by our own side - how many conversations have you heard where those folks who didn't get fancy degrees and who don't work in a nice, clean office get derided as extras from Deliverance?
Trump is their response. Trump is their champion. Trump is their avenger.
But to understand Trump's appeal is not to excuse him. He's as faithful to conservative principles as Bill is to Hillary, and when President Trump rethinks everything he has said during the campaign after moving into the soon-to-be-fabulous White House, his followers stand a fair chance of finding that they are now the blue dress.
Still, my assessment is that if he is nominated (which I think is no done deal for several reasons, like his pummeling in the recent debate) we are slightly better off with him than with one of the Dems - and his huge margins among women and Hispanics throw shade on the hope-over-experience notion that Trump can't beat Hillary. I think he'll beat her like a drum, and the amusement value of this bizarrely-coiffed charlatan driving the brownshirted liberal church lady nuts would almost be worth the risk to our Republic. But those who assess the danger of a President Trump as too great, well, you'll get no argument from me.
In 2012, I undertook the thankless task of trying to convince rabid libertarians that they were better off voting for Romney than remaining pure and in their basements. I was convinced I was right, and I was, in fact, right. But don't look for me to chide my principled conservative friends like Rick Wilson and Erick Erickson when they sit out Election Day. This is a strategic disagreement, and I can't say their strategy is too far off to be valid. Trump is not a conservative, and that's reason enough to shun him.
Trump has the potential to be a disaster of epic proportions. I'd vote for him as the nominee only because neither of the Democrats has the potential not to be. But if that's not enough for you to support him, well, I won't tell you you're wrong. And besides, if he's nominated, I'll be too busy stockpiling food and fortifying my rural apocalypse compound to try to convince you otherwise.
Nor do I. I held my nose and voted for Romney but have sinced vowed “never again”.
It will be the first time since voting for Ford in 1976, but if Trump is the nominee, I’ll likely sit this one out.
Of course
Not Trump. There is not much difference in the two except Hill has better manners.
Amen. If he is all that my vote won’t matter except to me.
“For all of those who couldn’t vote for Romney, we thank you for giving us Obama.
Apparently you all thought Romney would be worse than Obama.”
I bought into that argument when I supported GW Bush, despite my misgivings about his big-spending tendencies, the new world order crap of the Bush clan, and their strange preoccupation with Iraq. That didn’t work out; I got a stupid war and vast expansion of federal programs. I also got Obama, because what Bush did got hung around the neck of conservatives, and it killed the Republican brand in 08. If Bush begat Obama, who will Trump beget?
No thanks. The lesser of two evils argument has to have limits.
Isn’t that where you and the rest of the Hillary/Sandsers’ supporters hang out. Run away coward since only one person is actually fighting those Marxists.
Yes it gets ugly just like a physical war while your Goldman puppet lectures and primps.
Call him a liberal so you can stay under your desk coward.
Wow, Bray is a strong conservative and always has been - I can’t believe you said that.
I am just the opposite, Carter gave us Reagan. Obama will give us Trump.
Maybe it’s time to dig up the demon sheep commercial. :-)
Nope. They just won’t vote.
I understand your point; I just disagree that Trump is conservative, or will be successful as president.
He is more French Revolution than American Revolution in my eyes. Clearly you see it different, as is your God given right.
My comment was just letting you know where I am coming from when I write in someone for president in November. It is a thoughtful position, not an emotional one. I have a Hamiltonian view of who I support as the standard-bearer of my ideals, and Trump does not meet it.
Trump has always been a liberal. Some of us old timers have watched him for years so we have seen it first hand. He recently decided to pretend to be a conservative. It is sad that he so easily fools so many of you.
What's sad is to watch “conservatives” lap it up. He'll abandon all he ran on once elected if it gets in the way of his power and ego. You're already seeing hints of that as it's all but certain he will be the nominee.
You gotta hand it to him. He's good. He knows how to play his audience. Fortunately, there are a few of us who see past the “Hope and Change” type rhetoric and judge him on substance
He’s a helluva salesman. And a chameleon.
Do you promise?
Third party or skip that box?
Good, we do not need or want cowards. When he builds the wall you can come back and apologize.
Well...........I sure as hell can.
You "conservatives" are so magical in your belief that a word repeated often enough will stop the collapse of America. I've been fooled by nothing. I'm looking for a mailed fist landing on the southern border and the "news and commentary" industry.
“””Good, we do not need or want cowards. When he builds the wall you can come back and apologize.”””
When he changes his mind and goes back to his liberal ways and rejoins his liberal friends you can come back and apologize. He is a trojan horse. It is unfortunate that you cannot see that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.