Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s obsession with WW2 generals strikes sour note with historians
oan ^ | February 25, 2016 | Emily Flitter

Posted on 02/25/2016 4:56:21 PM PST by sparklite2

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Presidential candidate Donald Trump admires the late Douglas MacArthur and George Patton, both World War Two generals. They were winners, unpredictable, and not especially nice guys, he says in campaign speeches. But Trump's pledge to imitate their styles sets modern-day military experts on edge.

Born in 1946, a year after World War Two ended, Trump often praises MacArthur and Patton for the blunt ways he says they commanded respect. "George Patton was one of the roughest guys, he would talk rough to his men," Trump told an audience last week in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. "His men would die for him," Trump added. "We don't have that anymore." He said Patton would wipe out Islamic State without hesitation were he still in command.

But military historians and retired generals say Trump has an inflated view of the two military men and especially their relevance to an era of modern warfare when armies rely more on technology and when battle successes and failures and civilian casualties are communicated far more rapidly than when MacArthur and Patton commanded troops 70 years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at oann.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: tdsincomingbigtime; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last
To: sparklite2

There isn’t anything “conservative” about this article.


81 posted on 02/25/2016 5:37:11 PM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

since I am not Establishment doesn’t really apply to me.


82 posted on 02/25/2016 5:38:08 PM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Patton I understand. But MacArthur got caught flatfooted three times. And got his men killed each time.


83 posted on 02/25/2016 5:38:32 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Of course our Politicians in Uniform would say this.


84 posted on 02/25/2016 5:39:27 PM PST by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

lol, I was hoping he had fixed both.


85 posted on 02/25/2016 5:39:33 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Down, boy. I didn’t defend the article. And OAN is the last “conservative” news network standing, given the ongoing trashing of Fox. So “we” may not have any good right-wing outlets left.


86 posted on 02/25/2016 5:40:48 PM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

I’m not much of a fan of MacArthur, either. But Patton and Admiral Nimitz RULE.


87 posted on 02/25/2016 5:43:12 PM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

No, you make my point better than I could.


88 posted on 02/25/2016 5:46:45 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Lucky he survived. Lots of MacArthur’s troops didn’t.

Was he senior enough to make the Bataan bugout with Dugout, or was he later for the retreat from the 38th parallel or the Manchurian ambush?


89 posted on 02/25/2016 5:47:03 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

MacArthur was never caught flat footed.

If you are referring to his air force being attacked in the Philippines, read the whole story and you realize that he was going to extraordinary lengths to keep his planes in the air.

Absolutely astounding that the Japanese came in at the exact moment when he was forced to bring them down for refueling.

He wanted the Chinese to attack and wanted to use nuclear weapons to wipe them and Chairman Mao out. If we had done so there would be not Chinese Commies now.

I hope you are not referring to his being abandoned in the Philippines.

MacArthur’s landing at Inchon may have been the greatest success ever, especially since every other general opposed it.


90 posted on 02/25/2016 5:47:41 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
I guess now they are trying to stir up the anti-Patton vote.

LLOL (literally laughing out loud), good one!
91 posted on 02/25/2016 5:47:49 PM PST by loucon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
You might want to read up on the bonus marchers.

For real.

Quite applicable in our current financial situation...

92 posted on 02/25/2016 5:48:56 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x
Using the term "media whores" in reference to Patton and MacArthur is offensive, though. ,/i.

So far as the stature of Patton and McArthur are concerned, it's worth knowing that:

a. Patton's opponents, the Germans, considered him the most dangerous Allied general. A special unit was devoted to studying his tactics and trying to anticipate his moves. That is "respect".

b. McArthur's Southwest Pacific command suffered the lowest rate of casualties of any Allied command -- despite some of the most difficult fighting conditions in the war (jungle, disease, an opponent that fought to the death).

93 posted on 02/25/2016 5:50:04 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
modern-day military experts

What does that even mean? Is it like "behavioral experts" who have never raised kids and only wreck them? Or "financial experts" who never predict the market or trends correctly? Those kinds of experts? Notice that the article gives no names. Just unverifiable attributions. Completely worthless

94 posted on 02/25/2016 5:57:35 PM PST by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand. If you are French raise both hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

Patton was the best we had in Europe and MacArthur the best we had in the Pacific.

You see very few if any monuments to Ike or Bradley in France. Everywhere you turn you see Patton. The French people still revere him! He was a unique individual and his men worshiped him. I know a few and one told me” Patton would walk on water and we could, thanks to him, walk on water too.”

Patton fired up his men with his tough speeches. He was way ahead on psychological mind set and used it to encourage the will to win. He was brash and brutal and often foul mouthed, yet he was one of the most religious soldiers who ever lived. His trust and belief in God is well documented.

Patton was sacrificed by Eisenhower and Bradley on the altar of Political Correctness. Bradley owed everything he knew to Patton, yet he (Bradley) was a jealous, imperfect soldier. He hated Patton for his success and his pattern of ignoring orders he felt were ridiculous. Patton was up front with his men instead of in a command post many miles to the rear.

I am very glad Trump admires Patton and MacArthur. They were the very best.


95 posted on 02/25/2016 5:58:03 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

you said “his pattern of ignoring orders he felt were ridiculous” If Trump is that type of president, how can anyone say what the man will do, and that was my point.


96 posted on 02/25/2016 6:00:33 PM PST by txnativegop (Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

He was there for the Pusan breakout.


97 posted on 02/25/2016 6:00:58 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

There’s no comparison between the bonus marchers and the state of veteran care plus today’s GI Bill. Absolutely none.


98 posted on 02/25/2016 6:01:51 PM PST by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
But Trump's pledge to imitate their styles sets modern-day military experts on edge.

Run through honesty filter:

But I was able to find some unnamed generals who disagreed with my own likely hostile paraphrase of Trumps view of the men

99 posted on 02/25/2016 6:02:46 PM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leto

I am a big fan of Guderian. But Manstein is Guderian on a much larger scale. His first great offensive achievement was the conquest of France which at the time had an army larger than Germany. Defensively, he was able to re-establish a line for Army Group South after the defeat at Stalingrad and the subsequent Soviet offensive.


100 posted on 02/25/2016 6:03:32 PM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson