Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SilencerCo Turns Heads with Robocop-Like 9mm Handgun
Military.com ^ | Jan 19, 2016 | Brendan McGarry

Posted on 01/19/2016 11:29:48 AM PST by b4its2late

LAS VEGAS -- SilencerCo turned heads at this year's SHOT Show in Las Vegas with its latest prototype of the Maxim 9, a futuristic-looking 9mm pistol that sort of resembles the gun from the "RoboCop" movies.

"This is the world's first integrally suppressed 9mm handgun that is hearing safe with all types of 9mm ammunition," Jason Schauble, a marketing official for the company, said on Monday at range day the Boulder Rifle & Pistol Club outside Vegas. "It's definitely the coolest thing you'll see this week. I guarantee it."

Designers indeed looked to futuristic science-fiction movies for ideas, including "RoboCop" and "Judge Dredd," but ultimately settled on a unique design with a thick, rectangular front end and the operating mechanism in the rear of the weapon, Shauble said.

"I've got a 3.5-inch fixed barrel, so it's still accurate -- I can still get the velocity I need," he said. "But I've got as much room up front to suppress the actual noise."

When asked what makes the design unique, Schauble said, "People have done intergrally-supressed pistols before -- the Chinese, the Russians -- but they did it with a .32-caliber cartridge, which is not going to kill anything, or it's a you-can-only-use-this-bullet, right? -- I can only use a subsonic, light round, at 20 feet in close range or something like that. So we made it so I can use 124-grain-plus-p-plus jacketed hollow point, which is the loudest 9mm pistol cartridge in this configuration."

The weapon uses Glock magazines and can accommodate any type of after-market sights, he said. While a previous prototype was unveiled at a product launch event in September, this second version is "much closer to what our final iteration will look like," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: HeadOn

Years ago I saw a guy that tried to kill himself with a .32. Drank a bottle of whiskey and shot himself right between the eyes. When the whiskey wore off he called an ambulance. Bullet was lodged way back in his sinuses. We basically but a bandaide on him and sent him to psych for observation.


21 posted on 01/19/2016 12:28:07 PM PST by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
From myguntrust.com:

Under the ATF's final rule, the ATF is still going to continue to require proof that a valid NFA gun trust exists, i.e., a complete copy of the NFA gun trust. However, the ATF is also going to require proof that each "responsible person" on the NFA gun trust is entitled to possess firearms. Specifically, the ATF's final rule will also require each and every "responsible person" of the NFA gun trust to submit fingerprints and photographs. During the approval process, the ATF will conduct backgrounds checks on each and every "responsible person" of the NFA gun trust.

22 posted on 01/19/2016 12:35:20 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

*golf clap*


23 posted on 01/19/2016 12:36:34 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Good question....


24 posted on 01/19/2016 12:36:36 PM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

LOL


25 posted on 01/19/2016 12:36:54 PM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

That’s incredible! I’ll have to remember to double-tap...


26 posted on 01/19/2016 12:47:22 PM PST by HeadOn (I've read the last chapter. We win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

That’s not even remotely authorized by the statute.


27 posted on 01/19/2016 12:47:32 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

If they are “A” level members...able to transfer (Buy), or just pick up a piece of gear and a “papers” packet for a trip to the range.

Until then trust ho!

KYPD


28 posted on 01/19/2016 1:05:50 PM PST by petro45acp (Better mental health screening GOPe? Really? They had that in the soviet union...for dissidents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Looks kind of unbalanced, like I’d grow wrists and forearms like Popeye holding that thing.

Maybe the pistol needs a pistol grip? If nothing else it will scare the bejeebers out of most libtards. Cuomo is probably adding a 100 pages to the SAFE Act just to accommodate this one.


29 posted on 01/19/2016 1:07:18 PM PST by Made In The USA (Rap music: Soundtrack of the retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Maxim 9 In-depth Preview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1wbeur56y0


30 posted on 01/19/2016 1:16:33 PM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

A poster after my own heart. That’s my favorite pistol round. It’s the male version of the .40!


31 posted on 01/19/2016 1:35:19 PM PST by madconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madconservative

10mm is my EDC choice because I feel like my .460 Rowland may be a little too much gun. 10mm is just right.


32 posted on 01/19/2016 1:52:50 PM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

That there is one baaaad hangover, Doc.


33 posted on 01/19/2016 1:59:32 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

When did the law change on CLEO sign-off? Or, are you referring to NFA Trusts?


34 posted on 01/19/2016 2:50:43 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Updated rules were published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016, and take effect 180 days later on July 13, 2016.

Among the rule changes is that for individual NFA transactions there is no longer a requirement for your CLEO to sign off. You must merely notify the CLEO by providing him with a full copy of your completed form.

Here is the entire rule: https://www.atf.gov/file/100896/download

35 posted on 01/19/2016 3:31:30 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The wait times are shortening significantly. Four months for my recent purchases. SilencerCo is cool!!!


36 posted on 01/19/2016 4:35:31 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Signoff if you have a trust. Which is totally stupid.


37 posted on 01/19/2016 4:44:15 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Not if you had been fingerprinted once in the last two years for another purchase.


38 posted on 01/19/2016 4:45:27 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

No signoff if you have a trust. Trusts have always been “inform CLEO” only. What has changed for trusts is each member of the trust must submit fingerprint cards and passport photos, just as an individual application has always had to do.

The “inform CLEO only” for individuals combined with the fingerprinting requirement for Trust members makes NFA Trusts less attractive.

Not obsolete, but much less attractive from an individual’s standpoint.


39 posted on 01/19/2016 4:48:15 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Thanks, but I have never had to submit fingerprints/photos for any new trust purchase.


40 posted on 01/19/2016 5:08:13 PM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson