Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could metal particles be the clean fuel of the future?
ScienceDaily ^ | December 9, 2015 | McGill University

Posted on 12/20/2015 2:14:30 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin

Can you imagine a future where your car is fueled by iron powder instead of gasoline?

Metal powders, produced using clean primary energy sources, could provide a more viable long-term replacement for fossil fuels than other widely discussed alternatives, such as hydrogen, biofuels or batteries, according to a study in the Dec. 15 issue of the journal Applied Energy.

"Technologies to generate clean electricity -- primarily solar and wind power -- are being developed rapidly; but we can't use that electricity for many of the things that oil and gas are used for today, such as transportation and global energy trade," notes McGill University professor Jeffrey Bergthorson, lead author of the new study.

"Biofuels can be part of the solution, but won't be able to satisfy all the demand; hydrogen requires big, heavy fuel tanks and is explosive, and batteries are too bulky and don't store enough energy for many applications," says Bergthorson, a mechanical engineering professor and Associate Director of the Trottier Institute for Sustainability in Engineering and Design at McGill. "Using metal powders as recyclable fuels that store clean primary energy for later use is a very promising alternative solution."

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: energy; fuel; metal; metalparticles; particles; powder; powders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2015 2:14:30 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

“Novel concept

The Applied Energy paper, co-authored by Bergthorson with five other McGill researchers and a European Space Agency scientist in the Netherlands, lays out a novel concept for using tiny metal particles — similar in size to fine flour or icing sugar — to power external-combustion engines.

Unlike the internal-combustion engines used in gasoline-powered cars, external-combustion engines use heat from an outside source to drive an engine. External-combustion engines, modern versions of the coal-fired steam locomotives that drove the industrial era, are widely used to generate power from nuclear, coal or biomass fuels in power stations.

The idea of burning metal powders is nothing new — they’ve been used for centuries in fireworks, for instance. Since the mid-20th century, they’ve also been used in rocket propellants, such as the space shuttle’s solid-fuel booster rockets. But relatively little research has been done in recent decades on the properties of metal flames, and the potential for metal powders to be used as a recyclable fuel in a wide range of applications has been largely overlooked by scientists.”


2 posted on 12/20/2015 2:14:59 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

steel wool burns if you light it on fire-

I like turtles


3 posted on 12/20/2015 2:27:35 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

How long before we reach Peak Iron?


4 posted on 12/20/2015 2:27:44 PM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Aluminum is used in solid rocket fuels, and it will never run out since you can extract it from common rock. But it takes energy to extract it.


5 posted on 12/20/2015 2:29:16 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Metal burns hot.


6 posted on 12/20/2015 2:29:38 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Aluminium is the third most abundant element (after oxygen and silicon).


7 posted on 12/20/2015 2:30:47 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Once again, the bottom line is omitted. Refining these wonder fuels requires, well, energy- usually more energy inputs than resultant outputs (excluding fusion reactions, but that is another story- and a relatively uncontrollable power source unless aboard a ship or at a nuke generating plant).

“Using primary energy sources” is the key to the whole illusion. Just as ethanol, wind, solar etc- all require copious amounts of “primary energy” ( read petroleum) to get an out put- always less than the inputs.

Perhaps useful for space travel, missile engines etc but not for common personal use.


8 posted on 12/20/2015 2:31:46 PM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

It’s everywhere in earth’s crust. But to separate it from oxygen requires as much energy as it produces when burned. And there’s always additional overhead. It would be a clean fuel if that’s what this article is driving at, but how clean is the energy source used to extract it? The pollution just gets bumped up to another level.


9 posted on 12/20/2015 2:34:28 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
"Technologies to generate clean electricity -- primarily solar and wind power -- are being developed rapidly; but we can't use that electricity for many of the things that oil and gas are used for today, such as transportation and global energy trade," notes McGill University professor Jeffrey Bergthorson, lead author of the new study.

No, but oil fits the need perfectly, doesn't it? And it seems to be getting cheaper by the day. And oh, lookee -- there's an entire global infrastructure in place for it! And a global pricing mechanism.

Too bad...

10 posted on 12/20/2015 2:35:38 PM PST by o_1_2_3__ ( –)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Metal powders, produced using clean primary energy sources

Love to hear what they mean here, before I mock it.

11 posted on 12/20/2015 2:36:26 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

It takes a LOT of energy to extract it.


12 posted on 12/20/2015 2:37:34 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
steel wool burns if you light it on fire-

I like turtles

Add some aluminum powder and make a really nice fire. What's the turtle reference?

13 posted on 12/20/2015 2:42:50 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
"Technologies to generate clean electricity -- primarily solar and wind power -- are being developed rapidly; but we can't use that electricity for...transportation and global energy trade" mining and manufacturing metal powders.


14 posted on 12/20/2015 2:46:19 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy," example of today's politico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
It’s everywhere in earth’s crust. But to separate it from oxygen requires as much energy as it produces when burned. And there’s always additional overhead. It would be a clean fuel if that’s what this article is driving at, but how clean is the energy source used to extract it? The pollution just gets bumped up to another level.

I am not so certain it would be a clean fuel. The end product of combustion of Aluminum is Al2O3, aluminum oxide. If the Aluminum is finely divided to start out the Aluminum Oxide would also be finely divided, essentially dust. And, very hard, abrasive dust at that. Not the kind of thing you want speed over every highway.

15 posted on 12/20/2015 2:48:28 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
So how much energy does it take to refine iron powder?

Idiots.

16 posted on 12/20/2015 2:50:30 PM PST by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Nevermind that massive strip mining required to provide these “snowflakes” with all the little “tools” they need to tell US that “we” are killing the environment.


17 posted on 12/20/2015 2:56:36 PM PST by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Aluminium-air batteries or Al-air batteries produce electricity from the reaction of oxygen in the air with aluminium. They have one of the highest energy densities of all batteries, but they are not widely used because of problems with high anode cost and byproduct removal when using traditional electrolytes and this has restricted their use to mainly military applications. However, an electric vehicle with aluminium batteries has the potential for up to eight times the range of a lithium-ion battery with a significantly lower total weight.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium%E2%80%93air_battery

18 posted on 12/20/2015 3:00:03 PM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

I guess when we tire of burning our food we can get busy burning our high rises.


19 posted on 12/20/2015 3:03:46 PM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Would seem to have more potential than a lithium-ion battery in shipping a truckload of freight across the country.


20 posted on 12/20/2015 3:04:16 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson