To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
It’s everywhere in earth’s crust. But to separate it from oxygen requires as much energy as it produces when burned. And there’s always additional overhead. It would be a clean fuel if that’s what this article is driving at, but how clean is the energy source used to extract it? The pollution just gets bumped up to another level.
9 posted on
12/20/2015 2:34:28 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Telepathic Intruder
Itâs everywhere in earthâs crust. But to separate it from oxygen requires as much energy as it produces when burned. And thereâs always additional overhead. It would be a clean fuel if thatâs what this article is driving at, but how clean is the energy source used to extract it? The pollution just gets bumped up to another level. I am not so certain it would be a clean fuel. The end product of combustion of Aluminum is Al2O3, aluminum oxide. If the Aluminum is finely divided to start out the Aluminum Oxide would also be finely divided, essentially dust. And, very hard, abrasive dust at that. Not the kind of thing you want speed over every highway.
To: Telepathic Intruder
It also requires coal to produce iron from the ore.
30 posted on
12/20/2015 4:05:47 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
('Life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy for those who feel' - Horace Walpole)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson