Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

It’s everywhere in earth’s crust. But to separate it from oxygen requires as much energy as it produces when burned. And there’s always additional overhead. It would be a clean fuel if that’s what this article is driving at, but how clean is the energy source used to extract it? The pollution just gets bumped up to another level.


9 posted on 12/20/2015 2:34:28 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Telepathic Intruder
It’s everywhere in earth’s crust. But to separate it from oxygen requires as much energy as it produces when burned. And there’s always additional overhead. It would be a clean fuel if that’s what this article is driving at, but how clean is the energy source used to extract it? The pollution just gets bumped up to another level.

I am not so certain it would be a clean fuel. The end product of combustion of Aluminum is Al2O3, aluminum oxide. If the Aluminum is finely divided to start out the Aluminum Oxide would also be finely divided, essentially dust. And, very hard, abrasive dust at that. Not the kind of thing you want speed over every highway.

15 posted on 12/20/2015 2:48:28 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Telepathic Intruder

It also requires coal to produce iron from the ore.


30 posted on 12/20/2015 4:05:47 PM PST by Oztrich Boy ('Life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy for those who feel' - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson